Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

Stopping and searching the car and person of defense counsel coming into a USMS jail did not violate defendant’s right to access to counsel. The limitations were all reasonable. United States v. Freeman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6745 (E.D. Okla. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison visit with his brother being recorded on body camera of a nearby correctional officer. Saunders v. Vilbrandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 989 (W.D. Va. Jan. 2, 2025).* “To the extent … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Video surveillance | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

A successor habeas can’t be based on allegedly withheld evidence of a Fourth Amendment violation. Sanchez v. Cates, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226067 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2024). Defendant can’t show that defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

Defendant was in a special housing unit in a NY state prison. He knew he was under constant surveillance. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in admissions he made caught on video. People v. Ashcroft, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

In a motion to sever counts for trial, it was significant that the stuff was seized under the same search warrant. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217086 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2024). There was probable cause and nexus … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff’s jail telephone calls to the DA’s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).* When an officer invokes the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).* Defendant’s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

W.D.Pa.: Use of coarse language during prison strip search didn’t make it unreasonable

Prison strip search was not unconstitutional. “Shepard has failed to allege facts to support that the November 2022 search was unreasonable. She acknowledges that such searches are routinely conducted before an inmate leaves the correctional institution for outside medical appointments. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Use of coarse language during prison strip search didn’t make it unreasonable

OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

A postal worker’s information that defendant had lots of cash and was receiving packages that smelled like marijuana was probable cause for his house. State v. Middleton, 2024-Ohio-5172, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3877 (7th Dist. Oct. 28, 2024).* The use … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

OH: Negligent disposal of def’s car in impound while he was in jail wasn’t done in bad faith

Police searched defendant’s car at the impound lot, and he was sent certified mail to tell him to pick it up or it would be disposed of. They mailed it to his house while he was in jail so he … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on OH: Negligent disposal of def’s car in impound while he was in jail wasn’t done in bad faith

N.D.Okla.: Pipe on console of MMJ card holder not PC for plain view

A pipe on the car console of a MMJ card holder was not “immediately apparent” it was incriminating for plain view. United States v. Vasquez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174528 (N.D. Okla. Sep. 25, 2024). Plaintiff filed his Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Pipe on console of MMJ card holder not PC for plain view

D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

“Cars on the property” was particular enough for the search warrant for defendant’s property. United States v. Stucky, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166040 (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2024). Plaintiff inmate stated enough to proceed that he was subjected to harassing … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

Defendant’s electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release. United States v. Ramadan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23276 (6th Cir. Sep. 11, 2024). Plaintiff pleads an unreasonable strip search in prison, but the necessary … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement

LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement by Terry Castleman (“When Christina Cardenas visited her husband in 2019 at the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, she was forced to … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on LATimes: She endured a traumatic cavity search when visiting a California prison. Now she won a $5.6-million settlement

D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct

Misidentifying defendant’s cell phone for a search warrant as a Motorola when it was a Samsung is a mistake that can be overlooked. It had the phone number in the warrant and defendant’s pass code opened it. Finally, the good … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Misidentifying cell phone make in SW no error where number and pass code were correct

CA1: Seeing one’s naked body can violate 4A without it being a “search”

Plaintiff inmate gave birth at a hospital while serving a jail sentence. The jailers allegedly seeing her naked in the hospital delivery room violated clearly established Fourth Amendment law. “Thus, a search under the Fourth Amendment does not require Haskell … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Search | Comments Off on CA1: Seeing one’s naked body can violate 4A without it being a “search”

CA5: Drug dog jumping in already open window not unreasonable

Drug dog’s spontaneously jumping in the vehicle window that was down when the stop began wasn’t directed by the officer and didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Wilson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19424 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on CA5: Drug dog jumping in already open window not unreasonable

CA11: While prison visitor strip search violated 4A, SCOTUS and this circuit have never ruled, so QI applies [and QI reigns supreme]

A prison visitor was fully strip searched on entry into a Georgia state prison. This search violated the Fourth Amendment. But, because this circuit and SCOTUS have never confronted this issue, the law is not “clearly established” and she loses … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: While prison visitor strip search violated 4A, SCOTUS and this circuit have never ruled, so QI applies [and QI reigns supreme]

E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

Exposure to Covid-19 in prison didn’t state a Fourth or Eighth Amendment claim. Dingle v. Tommage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124710 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2024). Defendant was driving with a suspended license, and WVSP protocol dictated impoundment of the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim