Category Archives: Staleness

N.D.Cal.: 17 day delay in SW for firearm involved in alleged shooting isn’t stale

A search warrant based on a shooting 17 days earlier for the firearm wasn’t stale, and it was based on probable cause, despite a Franks challenge on part of it. United States v. Sembrano, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211699 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: 17 day delay in SW for firearm involved in alleged shooting isn’t stale

GA: Where state constitution or statute are recognized to be susceptible to a broader interpretation than the 4A, appellant has to show why or how; otherwise, it’s waived

Defendant also relies on the state constitution as well as statute in addition to the Fourth Amendment. “However, Hinkson makes no argument that state law provides a rule substantively different as applied to this case from that of the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness, State constitution | Comments Off on GA: Where state constitution or statute are recognized to be susceptible to a broader interpretation than the 4A, appellant has to show why or how; otherwise, it’s waived

MA: CP warrant wasn’t stale where information was 7 months old and he was a collector

Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. The affidavit referred to child pornography access on the internet seven months before the search warrant was sought, and it was not stale because it was likely child pornography would be found in … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on MA: CP warrant wasn’t stale where information was 7 months old and he was a collector

MA: SnapChat video of def with a firearm two days before SW was PC

A SnapChat video of defendant with a gun two days earlier was probable cause for a search warrant. Commonwealth v. Watkins, 2020 Mass. App. LEXIS 139 (Sept. 16, 2020). “Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint asserts a Fourth Amendment claim for unreasonable search … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on MA: SnapChat video of def with a firearm two days before SW was PC

S.D.Ohio: Child abuse allegation isn’t stale because it’s of “continuing concern”

The information for the search warrant was not stale: “In this light, the information about child abuse was not stale. Indeed, the character of the alleged crime—abuse of a child—was grounds for continuing concern.” As to continuing a traffic stop: … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Child abuse allegation isn’t stale because it’s of “continuing concern”

E.D.Mo.: No REP against photographing tattoo on chest at time of arrest

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy not to have a tattoo on his chest under his shirt photographed on his arrest. Therefore, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising it. Shumpert v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149584 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No REP against photographing tattoo on chest at time of arrest

NY1: Failure to get a ruling on search issue in trial court is waiver

Failure to get a ruling on a search claim in the trial court is waiver of the issue for appeal. People v. Collins, 2020 NY Slip Op 04517, 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610 (1st Dept. Aug. 13, 2020). Drug … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Failure to get a ruling on search issue in trial court is waiver

D.Mass.: Six week delay between PC of one drug possession made SW stale; no GFE here

The six week delay between the probable cause and the issuance of the search warrant for one drug possession was stale, and no reasonable officer could have concluded there was. Therefore, the good faith exception doesn’t apply. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Six week delay between PC of one drug possession made SW stale; no GFE here

TX1: SW to seize blood sample implicitly means it can be tested, too

A search warrant for a blood sample implicitly includes testing it. Davis v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 5990 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) July 30, 2020). Probable cause existed for seizure of five years of defendant’s Gmail account. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Overseizure, Staleness | Comments Off on TX1: SW to seize blood sample implicitly means it can be tested, too

E.D.Wis.: Six week delay in getting SW for electronics was reasonable; affidavit for SW showed scope of investigation

A six week delay between seizure of electronic devices and then seeking a warrant was reasonable. There likely was probable cause based on the seizure, but the affidavit for the warrant showed what the officers were doing in their “robust” … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Six week delay in getting SW for electronics was reasonable; affidavit for SW showed scope of investigation

CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

Defendant was indicted for child pornography, and the district court suppressed. The government appealed but dismissed the appeal without filing a brief. In the district court it dismissed the indictment. Later, on the same evidence from the same search warrant, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Unappealed suppression order from one district collateral estoppel on reindictment on same facts in a different district

CA7: Consenter had apparent authority; no signs she might not have actual authority

Based on all the evidence, the consenter had apparent authority to consent to the search of the house. While she’d supposedly moved out, she had a key and still had stuff there, and the officers had no suggestion that she … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA7: Consenter had apparent authority; no signs she might not have actual authority

E.D.N.C.: Excellent discussion of staleness in a CSLI application

The 2017 orders for real time CSLI didn’t satisfy the timeliness requirement for probable cause, and they would be stale. However, back then, the circuit hadn’t approached the holding in Carpenter at all, and the good faith exception would be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Excellent discussion of staleness in a CSLI application

KY: After DL found suspended, stop can be extended

When defendant was stopped and found to have a suspended license, the normal incidents of a traffic stop are accordingly extended, and that didn’t make waiting for a drug dog unreasonable. Olmeda v. Commonwealth, 2020 Ky. App. LEXIS 40 (Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on KY: After DL found suspended, stop can be extended

Cal.: Forgetting to take something under SW and getting another and coming back in days didn’t make it stale

Defendant’s alleged unlawful detention by the feds didn’t create a Fourth Amendment claim to suppress his statement to state officials while in custody. Police had at least four other ways to find defendant’s cell phone number, which they did to … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on Cal.: Forgetting to take something under SW and getting another and coming back in days didn’t make it stale

W.D.N.Y.: SW for telephone records not required instead of a subpoena

Defendant was entitled to a search warrant rather than a search warrant to obtain his telephone records. United States v. McClain, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55427 (W.D. N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020). The search warrant application for child pornography wasn’t at … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Staleness, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW for telephone records not required instead of a subpoena