Category Archives: Staleness

W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

The search warrant for a gun involved in shooting was not stale 11 days after the shooting. Firearms are durable and not consumables. United States v. Williams, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4950 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2026). The warrant for … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Staleness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: SW for gun 11 days after a shooting wasn’t stale

D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

The ping information warrant here was not stale. United States v. Torres, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4593 (D. Idaho Jan. 9, 2026). [It also seems like it would never get stale. It is information not subject to change; if anything, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Cell site location information, Pretext, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Ping information not stale

E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

It doesn’t matter that DTF officers were on the interstate and ordered defendant’s stop for a window tint violation because there was objective justification for it. The rest of the stop was with reasonable suspicion for the drug dog. United … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: DTF stop on interstate wasn’t pretextual when it was objectively reasonable for overtinting

CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

A three-week-old controlled buy was part of the probable cause. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness. Nexus was clear: “The nexus in this case, by contrast, left nothing to the imagination.” Police used pole camera surveillance … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

Child pornography probable cause allegations, especially those on a computer have a “long shelf life” and virtually never go stale. United States v. Picca, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 267611 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 30, 2025). Plaintiff alleged enough to proceed past … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

The search warrant on defendant’s social media accounts took longer to be executed than the ten days state statute provided for, but that wasn’t reason to exclude the product of the search. Despite the statutory violation, the real question is … Continue reading

Posted in Social media warrants, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IN: Failure to execute social media warrant in 10 days per statute did not require suppression where PC still existed

S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

A murder for hire scheme was exigency for a warrantless search. Here, the officers thought the firearm would be moved imminently on December 31, 2024, but the warrant wasn’t signed until after midnight January 1, 2025. It wasn’t automatically stale, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

OH5: Typo on SW date could be overlooked if it can be otherwise figured out

The warrant said without the blanks filled in: “‘Sworn to and subscribed in my presence this ___ day of August 2024. Time ___.’ The warrant also contained a partially pre-filled date line which read ‘Dated this ___ day of August … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Typo on SW date could be overlooked if it can be otherwise figured out

CA9: A successful Franks challenge means deletion of offending material and not addition of what was missing

“Welch successfully challenged five statements in the search warrant affidavit, and the district court did not clearly err in rejecting his challenge to several additional statements. Having found that Welch made the necessary showing with respect to the five statements, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: A successful Franks challenge means deletion of offending material and not addition of what was missing

NC: Nine-day delay between shooting and SW for gun wasn’t stale

A nine-day delay between a shooting and the search warrant for defendant’s place to look for the weapon wasn’t stale. The standard for timeliness is simply common sense. State v. Stevens, 2025 N.C. App. LEXIS 489 (Aug. 6, 2025).* A … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on NC: Nine-day delay between shooting and SW for gun wasn’t stale

OH1: Protective sweep unjustified; inevitable discovery alternative waived by state by lack of preservation

The protective sweep here was unreasonable because the only gun the officers knew anything about had already been found and there were no people to look for. The trial court erred in overruling the motion to suppress. The state waived … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Protective sweep, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on OH1: Protective sweep unjustified; inevitable discovery alternative waived by state by lack of preservation

E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. “Put plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

MT: SW obviates implied consent for BAC test

The police having obtained a search warrant for defendant’s BAC, the implied consent statute doesn’t apply. State v. Clinkenbeard, 2025 MT 54 (Mar. 25, 2025). Defendant’s long standing drug trafficking was not stale. 2022 information was refreshed by 2023 information. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Independent source, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on MT: SW obviates implied consent for BAC test

CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

Siccing a police dog on a sleeping man not subject to qualified immunity. Luethje v. Kyle, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6385 (10th Cir. Mar. 19, 2025). The CI’s information on a video showed his basis of knowledge and provided probable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Siccing police dog on sleeping man wasn’t subject to QI

PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

Defendant’s conviction for obstructing a search is affirmed. He was not entitled to a jury instruction that he had to have seen or read the warrant first where it was not disputed that he knew there was a warrant. Commonwealth … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on PA: For crime of obstructing a search, def didn’t have to see SW to know there was one when he was told

E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

“Under Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit law, Detective Erwin’s professional opinion [based on her experience] that the file contained child pornography was sufficient to establish probable case for the issuance of the search warrant. See Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 700; … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

SnapChat warrant wasn’t stale: “The passage of more than six months between Cardoso’s messages to Pyrtle and issuance of the October 2021 warrant did not undermine probable cause to believe that data from Pyrtle’s Snapchat account would provide evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

Information in the affidavit for warrant about a 2021 overdose was valid background and not stale information. State v. Martin, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 727 (6th Dist. Mar. 7, 2025). Officers getting a search warrant to enter to arrest was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

The officer’s briefly touching the vehicle’s exterior to redirect the canine’s focus did not constitute a search. The dog’s certification and training were sufficient to establish its reliability, absent conflicting evidence from the defendant. This traffic stop was not unconstitutionally … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

The ping of defendant’s cell phone to find him when a 13-year-old girl went missing was based on exigency under state statute. Brooks v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 19 (Jan. 31, 2025). All the factors supported reasonable suspicion: CI … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances