Monthly Archives: August 2023

CA5: Arrest on curtilage was subject to questions of fact

Plaintiff raised questions of fact and law as to the officer’s authority to arrest him in his front yard on the curtilage. Summary judgment denied on the merits, but remanded for further qualified immunity analysis. Sauceda v. City of San … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Arrest on curtilage was subject to questions of fact

MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn’t require suppression

The state’s statutory failure to allow defendant to contact a lawyer before a BAC test doesn’t require suppression of the BAC test. Dunbar v. Dir. of Revenue, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 (Aug. 15, 2023). “Movant provides no facts or … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn’t require suppression

ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

Defendant’s pleading only the state constitution waived the Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Bell, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 95 (Aug. 15, 2023). Defendant complained trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging a search of house that was allegedly burglarized and defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

CA5: Riley does not apply to border searches of cell phones

The search of defendant’s cell phone at the border was reasonable. The court will not apply Riley to border searches. Malik v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 21307 (5th Cir. Aug. 15, 2023). “The undersigned … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Border search, Cell phones, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Riley does not apply to border searches of cell phones

D.Minn.: Tracking warrant that provided for tracking but not installation was saved by GFE

The tracking warrant provided for tracking of the car, but did not mention installing the tracker. The court finds the good faith exception applies. United States v. Gonzalez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142057 (D.Minn. Aug. 15, 2023). There was probable … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Tracking warrant that provided for tracking but not installation was saved by GFE

W.D.Okla.: Pepper spray use under the circumstances was reasonable

“Anthony argues that Gottschalk used excessive force when he sprayed him with OC spray, which the court now refers to as pepper spray. Applying the Graham factors and considering the totality of the circumstances, the court concludes that a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Pepper spray use under the circumstances was reasonable

D.Mass.: No standing shown for anticipatory warrant

Defendant showed no standing to contest this anticipatory warrant for mailed drugs. United States v. Fontanez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141256 (D.Mass. Aug. 11, 2023).* Plaintiff’s pro se case against the police department that searched and arrested was four years … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Excessive force, Standing, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Mass.: No standing shown for anticipatory warrant

E.D.Pa.: Cell phone passcode given by consent, but Cellebrite can open phone anyway

Defendant consented to giving up the passcode to his phone. The court notes in n.2 that Cellebrite can crack the passcodes. United States v. Frey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141180 n.2 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2023). Defendant was reasonably denied … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Immigration checkpoints, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cell phone passcode given by consent, but Cellebrite can open phone anyway

S.D.Ga.: Probation search waiver valid despite def not signing it

Defendant’s probation Fourth Amendment waiver was still valid by law despite the fact he hadn’t signed the form. United States v. Crawford, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140719 (S.D.Ga. July 7, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139645 (S.D. Ga. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Search | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Probation search waiver valid despite def not signing it

W.D.Okla.: Broad challenges to how ptf was investigated all barred by Heck

“Many of Plaintiff’s alleged violations attack the procedures used to investigate and charge him, the evidence used to convict him, as well as the constitutionality of the first-degree murder statute under which he was convicted. Success on some of these … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Broad challenges to how ptf was investigated all barred by Heck

TN: Typo of street number of location of car to be searched could be overlooked when the car was still parked

Defendant was a suspect in a vehicular homicide. Her car with pedestrian damage was found parked in the driveway of her house at 207 Port Drive in Hamilton County. There was a typo on the street number despite the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Typo of street number of location of car to be searched could be overlooked when the car was still parked

“There is no ‘inadvertent negligence’ exception to [Stone v.] Powell.

“More to the point, however, is the irrelevance of any officer negligence in this habeas corpus case. Stone v. Powell bars habeas corpus consideration of Fourth Amendment claims as a basis for habeas relief. There is no ‘inadvertent negligence’ exception … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on “There is no ‘inadvertent negligence’ exception to [Stone v.] Powell.

NY4: No limitation in cell phone search was included, and it was thus not particular

The cell phone warrant sought all information on it about a 48 hour period without limitation, and it was vague and overbroad. “The warrant contained no language incorporating any other documents or facts. Significantly, the search of the phone was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on NY4: No limitation in cell phone search was included, and it was thus not particular

W.D.Pa.: Penn State’s Covid testing was reasonable under the 4A

The University’s Covid-19 testing does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141 S. Ct. 63, 67, 208 L. Ed. 2d 206 (2020) (“Stemming the spread of COVID-19 is a compelling interest.”); Klaassen v. Trs. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Penn State’s Covid testing was reasonable under the 4A

D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

Despite the criminal charges being dropped because city officers were outside their jurisdiction, the whole matter was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment because reasonableness doesn’t depend on state law violations. Kosiba v. Kleine, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139379 (D. Neb. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

D.Conn.: False dog alert may not mean anything

Alleged false alerts of a drug dog may not be at all because the dog could have smelled residual odor of drugs from some other time. United States v. Manson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138590 (D. Conn. Aug. 9, 2023) … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: False dog alert may not mean anything

Kansas Reflector: In Marion County newspaper raid, a grim threat to Kansans’ First Amendment rights

Kansas Reflector: In Marion County newspaper raid, a grim threat to Kansans’ First Amendment rights by Clay Wirestone:

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Kansas Reflector: In Marion County newspaper raid, a grim threat to Kansans’ First Amendment rights

NY Albany: Text message confession to molestation to wife was still covered by marital privilege when she disclosed to police

Defendant confessed to his wife by text message to molestation of his nephew. Despite her consenting to turn it over to the police, he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the message and marital privilege still applied. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress, Privileges, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NY Albany: Text message confession to molestation to wife was still covered by marital privilege when she disclosed to police

NJ: <6 second delay between 5 am announcement and entry violated state constitution

Less than six seconds between announcement and entry at 5 am violated the state constitutional guarantee for announcement before entry. Defendant was not known to ever be violent. State v. Nieves, 2023 N.J. Super. LEXIS 84 (Aug. 9, 2023):

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on NJ: <6 second delay between 5 am announcement and entry violated state constitution

D.Mont.: Dispatch’s reasonable mistake in reporting on arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

A reasonable mistake by dispatch in reporting on an arrest warrant doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Under Heien, “Reasonability is not equivalent to perfection, and so the Fourth Amendment allows for officials to make some mistakes, giving them ‘fair leeway … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Dispatch’s reasonable mistake in reporting on arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A