Category Archives: Privileges

CA7: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

The confrontation clause does not apply in suppression hearings. United States v. Bebris, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 20974 (7th Cir. July 15, 2021). The apartment’s search warrant was for evidence of drug sales from it. Those found there at the … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA7: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply in suppression hearings

Reason: Cops Say Encryption Hinders Investigations. These Documents Say Otherwise.

Reason: Cops Say Encryption Hinders Investigations. These Documents Say Otherwise. by J.D. Tuccille (“Law enforcers have plenty of tools; they just want to paw through our data without effort or expense.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Privileges | Comments Off on Reason: Cops Say Encryption Hinders Investigations. These Documents Say Otherwise.

Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case

Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case by Tim Cushing. The government filed this pleading.

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Techdirt: DOJ Asks DC Court To Compel Decryption Of Device Seized In A Capitol Raid Case

Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr

Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr, 134 Harv. L. Rev. 905 (2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Orin S. Kerr, Decryption Originalism: The Lessons of Burr

Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode?

Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode? by Robert J. Anello & Richard F. Albert (“When law enforcement seeks to compel a subject to provide a passcode to allow them to rummage through a cellphone, courts have … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on Law.com: Hey SIRI, Does the Fifth Amendment Protect My Passcode?

WaPo: Giuliani’s legal profession does not shield him from seizure of electronics, prosecutors say

WaPo: Giuliani’s legal profession does not shield him from seizure of electronics, prosecutors say by Shayna Jacobs (“Rudolph W. Giuliani, the onetime personal attorney to former president Donald Trump, cannot claim his profession should have shielded him from the search … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on WaPo: Giuliani’s legal profession does not shield him from seizure of electronics, prosecutors say

WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

Where the stop exceeded reasonableness, the district court’s finding it was de minimus was error. It was less than the time for the dog sniff, but the dog had time to arrive. Mahaffy v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 71 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on WY: Where the stop exceeds its purpose and becomes unreasonable, the fact it’s de minimus doesn’t make it reasonable

S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel giving passcode to def’s cell phone at AUSA’s request wasn’t consent; merely avoiding delay of decryption

An AUSA’s request of defense counsel for defendant’s cell phone’s passcode was not a request for consent. It was merely to avoid the delay of decryption. United States v. Mangini, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66764 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 6, 2021):

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Privileges | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Defense counsel giving passcode to def’s cell phone at AUSA’s request wasn’t consent; merely avoiding delay of decryption

NPR: When It Comes To Email, Some Prisoners Say Attorney-Client Privilege Has Been Erased

NPR: When It Comes To Email, Some Prisoners Say Attorney-Client Privilege Has Been Erased by Carrie Johnson:

Posted in E-mail, Privileges | Comments Off on NPR: When It Comes To Email, Some Prisoners Say Attorney-Client Privilege Has Been Erased

UT: No IAC for not objecting to recording of jail phone calls for spousal privilege

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising spousal privilege to recorded jail telephone calls since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the calls where spousal privilege in this context hadn’t been raised before in the state. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Privileges | Comments Off on UT: No IAC for not objecting to recording of jail phone calls for spousal privilege

FL5: Compelled production of cell phone passcode was moot point for lack of prejudice

Defendant claims she was forced to give up her cell phone passcode in violation of the Fifth Amendment would state a ground for reversal in this Florida district, but she doesn’t show what came from the phone into the trial. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on FL5: Compelled production of cell phone passcode was moot point for lack of prejudice

D.D.C.: Voluntarily providing iPhone passcode during proffer not immune act

Defendant’s providing his iPhone passcode during his proffer session did not immunize the contents of the phone from the government’s use at trial. Kastigar hearing (a misnomer) denied. United States v. Otunyo, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30000 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Voluntarily providing iPhone passcode during proffer not immune act

CA4: Suit by convict over arrest without PC doesn’t mention conviction and isn’t barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s complaint that his arrest was without probable cause doesn’t necessarily implicate his guilt or innocence, and it isn’t barred by Heck. He doesn’t even mention the conviction. Dizzley v. Garrett, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314 (4th Cir. Feb. 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on CA4: Suit by convict over arrest without PC doesn’t mention conviction and isn’t barred by Heck

UT: Suspect has a 5A right to not give up unlock code to cell phone

Defendant had a Fifth Amendment right to not give up the unlock code to his cell phone. Utah declines to apply the foregone conclusion exception to the Fifth Amendment to attempt to require a suspect to give up his cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on UT: Suspect has a 5A right to not give up unlock code to cell phone

MO: Trial court erred in shifting burden on voluntariness of consent to def and considering failure to testify at suppression hearing

The trial court erred in putting the burden of proof on the defendant to rebut the state’s claim of consent. He didn’t testify, but he cross-examined. The trial court also held against him the failure to testify. State v. Crum, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on MO: Trial court erred in shifting burden on voluntariness of consent to def and considering failure to testify at suppression hearing

TX11: No spousal privilege in recorded jail calls

Defendant’s jail calls to his wife were not privileged because he knew from the recording at the start of the call that it was being recorded. Newman v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 293 (Tex. App. – Eastland Jan. 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Privileges, Strip search | Comments Off on TX11: No spousal privilege in recorded jail calls

E.D.Va.: Attorney memorandum could be seized in plain view during search; 5A privilege was waived

In a criminal copyright infringement case, a search warrant issued, and the police seized an attorney memorandum in plain view. The court finds the attorney-client privilege was waived by prior disclosure to others. United States v. Dallmann, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Attorney memorandum could be seized in plain view during search; 5A privilege was waived

D.S.D.: Seizure of work product from def’s jail cell for witness tampering was reasonable and run through a taint team

The search of defendant’s jail cell for evidence of witness tampering in his “work product” was reasonable, and the government used a taint team to segregate it. “The government’s conduct in this case was neither ill-conceived nor outrageous. It must … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Seizure of work product from def’s jail cell for witness tampering was reasonable and run through a taint team

GA: Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a 5A violation

Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a Fifth Amendment violation. Motion to suppress improperly granted. State v. Awad, 2020 Ga. App. LEXIS 589 (Oct. 20, 2020):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on GA: Defendant’s refusal to submit to a urine test wasn’t a 5A violation

CT: Pretrial GPS monitoring didn’t violate right to counsel and is 4A reasonable

Pretrial GPS monitoring that can tell when the accused is at his attorney’s office doesn’t violate the right to counsel, and it’s reasonable when merely monitoring whether defendant is abiding by her pretrial travel restrictions. State v. Troconis, 2020 Conn. … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Privileges | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial GPS monitoring didn’t violate right to counsel and is 4A reasonable