Category Archives: Privileges

OH5: DTF officer can ask marked car to make stop

A DTF officer surveilling defendant who saw a traffic offense could ask a marked car to make a traffic stop. State v. Streeter, 2026-Ohio-1668 (5th Dist. May 5, 2026).* In the Fulton County 2020 ballot seizure and return case, the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Good faith exception, Independent source, Privileges | Comments Off on OH5: DTF officer can ask marked car to make stop

E.D.Va.: SW for WaPo’s reporter’s home and devices violated Privacy Protection Act

The search warrant for a Washington Post reporter’s computers, phone, and files violated the Privacy Protection Act because it was not evidence of a crime or contraband. It also implicates prior restraint on speech. The USMJ’s order that the court … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: SW for WaPo’s reporter’s home and devices violated Privacy Protection Act

E.D.Va.: SWs don’t have to specify how they’re executed; photos of posed hands not suppressed

The warrant here required “photographing his hands, fingers, and forearms.” The search warrant’s particularity wasn’t violated by manipulating his hands to allegedly mimic what was seen in child pornography photographs off his computer. Search warrants don’t have to specify how … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: SWs don’t have to specify how they’re executed; photos of posed hands not suppressed

WaPo: Second judge maintains DOJ can’t search data seized from Post reporter

WaPo: Second judge maintains DOJ can’t search data seized from Post reporter by Perry Stein& Aaron Schaffer (“The Justice Department had taken a phone and computers belonging to The Washington Post’s Hannah Natanson as part of a leak investigation.”) The … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on WaPo: Second judge maintains DOJ can’t search data seized from Post reporter

W.D.N.Y.: Civil discovery dispute denies access to other employees’ cell phones as 4A issue

In an employment action against a city, plaintiff sought discovery of messages on cell phones. Making the city seek them raises Fourth Amendment concerns under O’Connor v. Ortega. Reynolds v. City of Rochester, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93293 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Civil discovery dispute denies access to other employees’ cell phones as 4A issue

E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

The government obtained defendant’s cell phone passcode by questioning him. Despite the potential Fifth Amendment violation, the court finds that the cell phone would have been opened by the government’s forensics team anyway, so inevitable discovery applies. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Pretext, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Possible 5A violation in obtaining cell phone passcode mooted by inevitable discovery; they’d get into it anyway

DE: Lack of binding authority for 5A cell phone thumbprint claim means it’s denied

Trial counsel didn’t challenge the use of defendant’s thumbprint to access his cell phone, acknowledging case law against it being testimonial. “It does not appear that either this Court or the United States Supreme Court has addressed the issue. Nor … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on DE: Lack of binding authority for 5A cell phone thumbprint claim means it’s denied

MN: Physician-patient privilege doesn’t exempt medical records from SW

Nonprivileged information in a patient’s medical records does not automatically become privileged when it is transmitted to or acquired by a healthcare provider. The physician-patient privilege statute does not prohibit a district court from issuing an order granting the State’s … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MN: Physician-patient privilege doesn’t exempt medical records from SW

E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

WaPo reporter search warrant: The government failed to even acknowledge the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 in its warrant application. “The government’s conduct has disturbed that baseline posture of deference” that it always gets. In re Search of the Real … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what is shared with a cloud AI program, even if it’s in anticipation of litigation. Therefore, no attorney-client privilege in what the client shares with AI trying to help his attorney. United … Continue reading

Posted in AI, Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

ID: There is no legal privilege in pharmacy records

There is no legal privilege in pharmacy records. Pharmacists are independent actors in the medical field. The trial court erred in granting a motion in limine. Just because a psychotherapist prescribed a drug isn’t privileged. State v. Borek, 2026 Ida. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on ID: There is no legal privilege in pharmacy records

The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext

The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext (“On Wednesday morning, the FBI raided the home of Washington Post journalist Hannah Natanson in an alarming escalation of the Trump administration’s war on press freedom. The … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Intercept: FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter’s Home Was Based on Sham Pretext

VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

Defendant’s simple [nonaggressive] refusal to comply with a search warrant for his DNA for 12 days was admissible at trial. [There’s also a prior discussion that suggests harmless error.] Lee v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 32 (Jan. 13, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

The drug dog arrived while the traffic tickets were still being written. All the record shows is that. The record doesn’t “reveal how much time elapsed between the canine’s arrival and it alerting to the odor of unlawful drugs emanating … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

CA9: 5A takings clause doesn’t support damages claim during SWAT siege; concurrence seemingly finds 4A privilege

Pena v. City of L.A., 158 F.4th 1033 (9th Cir. 2025). From the Syllabus:

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: 5A takings clause doesn’t support damages claim during SWAT siege; concurrence seemingly finds 4A privilege

D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

The use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial. United States v. Blythe, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231852 (D.D.C. Nov. 23, 2025) (interesting read). Just because defense counsel didn’t appeal a losing Fourth Amendment issue doesn’t make … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

OH6: Def’s medical records from hospital required SW not GJ subpoena

Defendant’s hospital records were obtained by grand jury subpoena. He moved to suppress claiming that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant was required. The court agrees, rejecting numerous arguments from the state. In addition, the court … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH6: Def’s medical records from hospital required SW not GJ subpoena

VA: Second frisk was still with RS

Defendant’s second frisk was valid, despite a prior frisk not finding anything. “We have no doubt that the situation here presented such circumstances, on the heels of a possible armed robbery with suspects on the scene and the whereabouts of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on VA: Second frisk was still with RS

The Guardian: Kansas county to pay more than $3m over police raiding local newspaper

The Guardian: Kansas county to pay more than $3m over police raiding local newspaper by Lucy Campbell (“Marion county agrees to apologize over 2023 raid that led to national outcry over press freedom, said newspaper’s editor”)

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on The Guardian: Kansas county to pay more than $3m over police raiding local newspaper