Category Archives: Issue preclusion

MI: Lifetime SO registration and GPS monitoring was reasonable

Lifetime SORNA registration and GPS monitoring was reasonable here because defendant’s victim was under 13. People v. Vandermel, 2026 Mich. App. LEXIS 4464 (May 28, 2026).* On a successor habeas: “Here, the ground Mack raises in his instant application was … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, GPS / Tracking Data, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MI: Lifetime SO registration and GPS monitoring was reasonable

CA9: When a digital computer search reveals a CP hash value, officer doesn’t have to see image to have PC

A digital computer search that produces an image with a hash value that matches known child pornography is probable cause without the officer even seeing the image. United States v. Johnsen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 14893 (9th Cir. May 26, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: When a digital computer search reveals a CP hash value, officer doesn’t have to see image to have PC

NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

When the accused raises a mental health defense, he waives any reasonable expectation of privacy in the records. S.M. v. City of N.Y., 2026 NY Slip Op 03248, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3413 (1st Dept. May 21, 2026).* “[T]he … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

OH6: Exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones

The exclusionary rule only applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones.State of Ohio/City of Or. v. Hendricks, 2026-Ohio-1796 (6th Dist. May 15, 2026).* Under Stone, “The only relevant question for this federal habeas Court is whether Butler was given a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH6: Exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones

N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

Plaintiff fully litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and lost. Collateral estoppel bars him from pursuing a federal claim for the same thing. Pelton v. Amador, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98995 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2026). Defendant faults … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in files on his computer that were open for peer-to-peer sharing. Therefore, when the government used BitTorrent to access his computer, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. People … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

The officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t have happened. The remainder says two controlled buys, and these were found to be isolated transactions, the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026). Defendant’s valid stop … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

MS: Failure to include SW materials anywhere in record was waiver of issues about it

Failure to include the search warrant materials anywhere in the record, either as an attachment to the motion or an exhibit at a hearing, is waiver for appeal on whether the warrant was properly issued. Burdine v. State, 2026 Miss. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Warrant papers | Comments Off on MS: Failure to include SW materials anywhere in record was waiver of issues about it

CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

This search warrant didn’t go stale in the three days between the controlled buy and its execution. United States v. Lawrence, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9780 (6th Cir. Apr. 3, 2026).* The BAC blood draw statute includes drawing and testing, … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 3 days between controlled buy and SW execution not stale

CA8: Password note near domestic partner’s computer was RS def on probation used that computer, too

Passwords near a computer seen in a probation search around defendant’s domestic partner’s computer was reasonable suspicion defendant could have too. United States v. Berry, 24-2337 (8th Cir. April 3, 2026).* Mandamus doesn’t lie to remedy petitioner’s constitutional claims. He … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA8: Password note near domestic partner’s computer was RS def on probation used that computer, too

OH9: Arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house permitted entry under Payton

Officers had an arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house, and that permitted their entry under Payton. State v. Cecil, 2026-Ohio-1100 (9th Dist. Mar. 30, 2026). The record on who actually consented or had apparent authority is incomplete, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH9: Arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house permitted entry under Payton

ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

“Having considered the rationale justifying protective sweeps, we hold, as a matter of first impression, that probation officers conducting lawful compliance checks in a residence may conduct a protective sweep to the same extent and are subject to the same … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

The officer had reasonable suspicion defendant was armed, but also in a firearm-free zone during Mardi Gras which was reasonably determined. United States v. Bryant, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62869 (E.D. La. Mar. 25, 2026).* 2255 petitioner’s guilty plea waived … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.La.: RS def was armed in a NOLA firearms free zone

N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

Officers arrived at the house the subject of an open 911 call during the emergency, and that authorized entry. United States v. Bray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63142 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 25, 2026).* The court can’t tell from the body … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Police arriving during ongoing 911 call justified entry on exigency

CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

A 48 hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Garza, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8714 (9th Cir. Mar. 25, 2026). Petitioner’s bank records were obtained by search warrant. They are third party … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: 48-hour delay in getting a warrant for a mailed package wasn’t unreasonable

RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel not moving to suppress DNA off a blanket found on a road when he’d stipulated to it being his DNA. [There’s also an obvious abandonment issue not even mentioned.] Tassone v. State, 2026 R.I. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Nexus | Comments Off on RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

The officer’s unreasonable mistake of law on windshield tint (“can’t have tint at all” v. it can have some) did not make the stop reasonable under Heien. Griffin v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 19, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: Officer’s unreasonable mistake of law did not make the stop reasonable under Heien

IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

Conflict of laws: Indiana’s Pirtle rule that consent searches afford a right to consult with counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state that encounter defendant and get consent to search. Mendenhall v. State, 2026 Ind. App. LEXIS 81 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Conflict of laws, Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on IN: State rule that consent to search carries with it a right to consult counsel doesn’t apply to police in another state acting on their own

D.N.H.: Private entrance to third-floor apartment’s curtilage is the hallway leading to it

Plaintiff lived in a third-floor apartment in a building where only he had a key and access, and that was his curtilage. (Apparently the door was unlocked when this entry occurred.) The individual official entered without knocking and getting permission … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Private entrance to third-floor apartment’s curtilage is the hallway leading to it