Monthly Archives: July 2023

SDT-U: Could San Diego Police Department’s smart streetlights program infringe upon privacy rights? [as in 500 pole cameras]

The San Diego Times-Union: Could San Diego Police Department’s smart streetlights program infringe upon privacy rights? By Lyndsay Winkley (“Experts say it’s hard to identify when surveillance technology encroaches on a person’s Fourth Amendment rights, but pervasiveness definitely plays a … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on SDT-U: Could San Diego Police Department’s smart streetlights program infringe upon privacy rights? [as in 500 pole cameras]

CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

Officers’ apparent delays in processing paperwork on an arrest which resulted in plaintiff spending an extra two days in jail without any kind of probable cause finding violated clearly established law. Here, the prosecutor wouldn’t act without their paperwork. “It … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Arrest paperwork delay here violated Riverside 48 hour rule

CA6: In § 1983 case, exceptions to warrant requirement aren’t likely affirmative defenses to plead

Exceptions to the warrant requirement do not appear to be affirmative defenses required to be pled in a § 1983 case under F.R.C.P. 8(c) waived by not pleading in first response. Szappan v. Meder, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19485 (6th … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA6: In § 1983 case, exceptions to warrant requirement aren’t likely affirmative defenses to plead

PA: Officers knocked before entry and defendant acknowledged their presence

Failure to comply with the knock and announce requirement could result in exclusion under state law. Here, however, the trial court’s findings of fact justified dispensing with the knock-and-announce requirement. Officers heard defendant acknowledge their presence, and then they entered … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on PA: Officers knocked before entry and defendant acknowledged their presence

CA8: Pulling off a blanket during a stop on slight RS was unreasonable

Defendant got off a Greyhound bus in Omaha during a driver change. The officers just barely had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant, and pulling his blanket off amounted to a search. That enabled the officer to see he had a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Pulling off a blanket during a stop on slight RS was unreasonable

CA3: The search exceeding the scope of a warrant justified suppression

The search exceeding the scope of a warrant justified suppression: “But here, the benefit of suppression is neither marginal nor nonexistent. The agents exceeded the scope of authority conferred by the warrant when they either ignored or disregarded the risk … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA3: The search exceeding the scope of a warrant justified suppression

W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

An alleged violation of department policy on police chases doesn’t equal a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. Moore, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130238 (W.D. Tenn. July 27, 2023). Speeding and erratic driving justified the stop, and alcohol was seen … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Violation of police dept. vehicle chase policy doesn’t equate to a violation of the 4A

W.D.Va.: Info on def’s cell phone provided nexus for SW of house

Information on defendant’s cell phone linking him and Trafficker A also linked his home to the transactions and that showed nexus. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130082 (W.D. Va. July 27, 2023).* The information about defendant’s drug … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Info on def’s cell phone provided nexus for SW of house

D.Nev.: Request of internet provider to preserve evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) is not a seizure

“Here, the Court finds that Omegle and TextNow’s preservation of evidence in response to the Government’s request under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f)—a provision of the Stored Communications Act—did not violate the Fourth Amendment for two reasons. First, because the preservation … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Request of internet provider to preserve evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) is not a seizure

NY3: Leaving one’s house to do a drug deal and returning is nexus to house

“Contrary to defendant’s contention, the CI’s basis of knowledge was not undermined by the fact that the CI did not actually enter the apartment during the controlled buys …. A sufficient nexus to the apartment was established by the continuous … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY3: Leaving one’s house to do a drug deal and returning is nexus to house

OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it

A dog alert on a car was probable cause for a search of it and containers, here a backpack. State v. Kumuhone, 2023-Ohio-2586, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2554 (8th Dist. July 27, 2023). “The contemporaneous tip, the visual details that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it

N.D.N.Y.: Escapee from BOP halfway house had no REP in apt. where he was found

Defendant was an escapee from a BOP halfway house, and he had no reasonable expectation of privacy where he was found. Also, he was subject to a search condition at the halfway house, and that’s not avoided by escape. United … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Escapee from BOP halfway house had no REP in apt. where he was found

Reason: A SWAT Team Destroyed an Innocent Man’s Shop. Then the City Left Him With the Bill.

Reason: A SWAT Team Destroyed an Innocent Man’s Shop. Then the City Left Him With the Bill. by Billy Binion (“Pena didn’t fault the city for attempting to subdue an allegedly dangerous person. But he objected to what came next: … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: A SWAT Team Destroyed an Innocent Man’s Shop. Then the City Left Him With the Bill.

E.D.Tenn.: Suppression not remedy for violation of equal protection

Suppression of evidence is not the remedy for an equal protection violation, even if it were valid, which it’s not. United States v. Christie, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129172 (E.D. Tenn. July 26, 2023). A fictitious license plate is reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Pretext, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Suppression not remedy for violation of equal protection

S.D.Ind.: Drone use that didn’t go over curtilage was reasonable

The use of a drone to surveil plaintiffs’ home from a distance in a child welfare case was not unreasonable. The drone didn’t fly over the house or curtilage, and the police were concerned plaintiffs had a “small arsenal” and … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Drone use that didn’t go over curtilage was reasonable

CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

The remedy for a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act is civil, not exclusion. United States v. King, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19052 (10th Cir. July 25, 2023) (denying COA). “On the whole, the factors outlined in Chavez provide mixed … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: Civil remedy for violation of Posse Comitatus Act, not exclusion

Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

Officers had probable cause to search defendant’s passenger compartment for a firearm. When the gun wasn’t found there, the officer searched the trunk, finding it. The probable cause, however, did not extend to the trunk. People v. Leal, 2023 Cal. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on Cal.3: PC to search passenger compartment for gun didn’t extend to the trunk

CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

Qualified immunity applies to the Virginia DOC directing a drug test of a Telecommunications Network Coordinator. “After VDOC fired Garrett for declining a random drug test, Garrett sued, alleging that VDOC employees violated his Fourth Amendment rights by applying VDOC’s … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

D.D.C.: SEC admin subpoena for law firm cyberattack was narrowed to only affected clients

Covington & Burling was the target of a cyberattack, and the SEC investigated. It wanted the names of all affected clients, but C&B resisted, seeking narrower disclosure. The law firm agreed that only certain affected clients should be disclosed, and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SEC admin subpoena for law firm cyberattack was narrowed to only affected clients

E.D.Wis.: Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress

Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress. But, it still loses on the merits. United States v. Love, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126671 (E.D. Wis. July 24, 2023).* This stop was based on reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Late disclosed information justified the late filing of the motion to suppress