Category Archives: Nexus

CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

There is no interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to suppress in the federal system. United States v. Cox, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677 (6th Cir. Aug. 24, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not making a frivolous motion … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: No interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

KY: Despite lack of nexus, SW sustained under GFE

A search warrant for defendant’s place was because Customs had flagged a child sex doll coming to his house. While the state supreme court held that while nexus was lacking, it remanded for determination of the good faith exception. Looking … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KY: Despite lack of nexus, SW sustained under GFE

CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

The affidavit for warrant here provided neither nexus nor timing to address 6740. As to all around it, yes, but not there. As to timing, as to the others, yes, but all the police had as to 6740 was 13-year-old … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

CA6: Defs’ use of Facebook to discuss their crime justified SW to Facebook

Defendants used Facebook to discuss their criminal enterprise, and the warrant for Facebook was not overbroad. United States v. Fordham, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 21811 (6th Cir. July 22, 2026).* A controlled buy arranged through defendant’s cell phone supported the … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Particularity, Social media warrants, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA6: Defs’ use of Facebook to discuss their crime justified SW to Facebook

CA4: Cell phone non-forensic border search doesn’t require individualized suspicion

“Border searches do not require a warrant to be reasonable. And if a border search is routine, individualized suspicion is not required either. But law enforcement may not conduct a nonroutine border search without individualized suspicion. Under our precedent, forensic … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Cell phone non-forensic border search doesn’t require individualized suspicion

D.D.C.: A cell phone SW without PC in a felon in possession case is a general warrant because of its intrusiveness

Cell phone warrant for felon in possession case is quashed. No probable cause or nexus to the crime. Just because someone owns a cell phone doesn’t mean the government gets to search it. It is effectively a general warrant. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, General warrant, Nexus, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: A cell phone SW without PC in a felon in possession case is a general warrant because of its intrusiveness

E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged knock-and-announce violation and a police shooting of the homeowner. SCOTUS should just go ahead and abandon Bivens. It proceeds as an FTCA case. Malinowski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148126 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

There was probable cause for search of defendant’s house for clothing that was worn in the crime. What happens outside the house can create an inference that what’s sought is inside. (The good faith exception would also apply.) United States … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Consent, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.D.C.: SW of house for clothing used in crime didn’t violate 4A

CA5: Accidentally shooting the man who disarmed the shooter from a residence was not a constitutional violation

“This is a tragic case of mistaken identity. A police officer believed he was targeting a gunman who had been firing on police from a residence. Instead, he shot and badly wounded a man who had disarmed the actual shooter … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Forfeiture, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Accidentally shooting the man who disarmed the shooter from a residence was not a constitutional violation

TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

“In this case, the evidence was that, although the Defendant lived in the van, the van was registered to someone else, and the vehicle registration indicated the same. The doors to the van were wide open and it was parked … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Def lived in a van left wide open in a public area, but it didn’t belong to him, so no REP as to interior

VI: Despite ubiquity of cell phones, nexus has to be shown to alleged crime

The suppression of the cell phone is affirmed. The telephonic warrant omitted to mention what it was that the police were seizing. The ubiquity of cell phones isn’t carte blanche to seize any cell phone in a defendant’s possession. There … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Despite ubiquity of cell phones, nexus has to be shown to alleged crime

TX14: Affidavit for SW gets deferential standard of review by both the trial court and appellate court

The affidavit for search warrant gets a deferential standard of review by both the trial court and appellate court. Gaither v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4588 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) May 19, 2026). “The federal district court … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Pole cameras, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX14: Affidavit for SW gets deferential standard of review by both the trial court and appellate court

VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

There was a lack of nexus to cell phone to this alleged crime which voids the search warrant for it, and the good faith exception does not apply. Just having a cell phone on one’s person doesn’t link it to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

The search warrant for defendant’s phone showed nothing about probable cause to believe any evidence would be on it. The mere fact he likely carried the phone with him all the time isn’t enough. (But the court concedes maybe it’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

The officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t have happened. The remainder says two controlled buys, and these were found to be isolated transactions, the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Nexus, Search incident, Staleness | Comments Off on MA: Two isolated controlled buys 20 days before SW issued were stale

VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

This was a traffic stop, and defendant had a suspended license. She was able to call her son to come to drive her and the car home, and she would not be arrested. The officer’s taking 12 seconds to ask … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: 12 second question about drugs didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop that was going to take a while anyway

CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

The military court had to also consider the Fourth Amendment rights of the victim to sensitive information the accused sought access to for trial. All things considered, even if the court martial judge was wrong denying it, it was harmless … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Military searches, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CAAF: Victim’s 4A rights were at issue, too

CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

Using an unmarked police car to stop plaintiff with a PIT maneuver requested by detectives without warning here raised sufficient factual disputes that the officers do not get summary judgment nor qualified immunity on an excessive force claim in his … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: PIT maneuver with unmarked car for detectives making a stop could be excessive force

D.Mass.: A failed attempt at an admin warrant and Franks violation

A contractor doing remodeling to a Bearded Dragon online business told the City about health code violations on the premises after he walked off the job. A health department officer walked through with permission and noted no violations. Later, an … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: A failed attempt at an admin warrant and Franks violation

E.D.Pa.: Cell phone search suppressed for lack of nexus to alleged crime; everybody has a cell phone

Cell phone search suppressed for lack of nexus. Merely having one isn’t enough. Everybody has one. United States v. Lacosta-Franco, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72244 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 2, 2026):

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cell phone search suppressed for lack of nexus to alleged crime; everybody has a cell phone