D.Mass.: No standing shown for anticipatory warrant

Defendant showed no standing to contest this anticipatory warrant for mailed drugs. United States v. Fontanez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141256 (D.Mass. Aug. 11, 2023).*

Plaintiff’s pro se case against the police department that searched and arrested was four years out of time and barred by the fact the police department was not a “person.” Patrick v. Kingston Police Dep’t, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 20958 (3d Cir. Aug. 11, 2023).*

Expert opinions on reasonableness of force are usually inadmissible, citing several cases. Ball-Bey v. Chandler, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140048 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 10, 2023).*

The indisputable connection between guns and drugs made this patdown reasonable. United States v. Harris, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 20984 (4th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023).*

The stop was not coercive and was reasonable. Yarofalchuw v. Cabrera, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141086 (N. Mar. Isl. Aug. 11, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Anticipatory warrant, Excessive force, Standing, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.