Category Archives: State constitution

CA11: Week’s delay in getting SW for cell phone was reasonable; def in custody and didn’t ask for it back.

The warrant for defendant’s cell phone wasn’t issued for a week, but the delay was reasonable. He was in jail with a diminished privacy interest, and he didn’t ask for it back. United States v. Watson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: Week’s delay in getting SW for cell phone was reasonable; def in custody and didn’t ask for it back.

UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

The court finds officers baiting defendant into a recorded phone call where he was under a protective order and could not adequately respond “shocked the conscience” and would be suppressed. State v. Lewis, 2024 UT App 96, 2024 Utah App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on UT: Def satisfied “shocking the conscience” standard for recording a telephone call while under a protective order and he couldn’t fully respond

D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

“‘The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant. The determination of probable cause is based upon a “totality of the circumstances” test, and the government’s evidence must be more than that which … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Forfeiture, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

MT: Entry onto def’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable

Entry onto defendant’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable. Montanans have a heightened expectation of privacy in their posted rural lands. State v. Lanchantin, 2024 MT 129 (June 18, 2024). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, State constitution, Trespass | Comments Off on MT: Entry onto def’s rural land past “Posted” and “No Trespassing” signs to issue a traffic citation was unreasonable

TN: “Possessions” in search clause of state const. gives REP in rural hunting land

Because the Tennessee Constitution uses “possessions” rather than “effects,” plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy in rural land that he used that wildlife officers entered upon to enforce hunting laws. Rainwaters v. Tenn. Wildlife Res. Agency, 2024 Tenn. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on TN: “Possessions” in search clause of state const. gives REP in rural hunting land

WA: Failure to argue the state constitution to the trial court waived reliance on it on appeal

Failure to argue the state constitution to the trial court waived reliance on it on appeal. State v. Troutman, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 672 (Apr. 8, 2024). There was reasonable suspicion for lengthening this detention from the fact the LPN … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: Failure to argue the state constitution to the trial court waived reliance on it on appeal

MN: The state const. doesn’t bar geofence warrants, and this one was issued with PC under 4A and state constitution

Syllabus: “Geofence warrants, which authorize law enforcement to obtain location-history data of cellular devices that were within a defined area during a specified time frame, are not categorically prohibited by the United States and Minnesota Constitutions as general warrants, but … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, State constitution | Comments Off on MN: The state const. doesn’t bar geofence warrants, and this one was issued with PC under 4A and state constitution

Iowa does not recognize state constitutional torts; here excessive force

Iowa does not recognize state constitutional torts; here excessive force. “Krystal Wagner, individually and as the administrator of the estate of her son, Shane Jensen, appeals the district court decision granting summary judgment to the State and Officer William Spece … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on Iowa does not recognize state constitutional torts; here excessive force

NM: Def had standing in zippered bag in car under state constitution despite denial of ownership at trial

Defendant filed a motion to suppress the inventory search of a black zippered bag in his car. At trial, however, he denied the bag was his. He still had standing under the state constitution because of the higher expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Def had standing in zippered bag in car under state constitution despite denial of ownership at trial

Cal.4: Def passed out 45 min. after arrival at hospital; officer’s failure to get SW for blood draw was inexcusable, so no GFE either

Defendant was transported to the hospital after a vehicle accident. The officer was attempting to talk to him. Defendant was lethargic and had a hard time answering questions. About 45 minutes into the hospital stay, he passed out. Blood was … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.4: Def passed out 45 min. after arrival at hospital; officer’s failure to get SW for blood draw was inexcusable, so no GFE either

WV: State did not justify “officer safety” as reason for entry

The state failed to justify the entry here on officer safety grounds because their neighbor disturbance call included no reference to potential violence or threats and no good reason could be articulated other than “officer safety” which essentially is always … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, State constitution | Comments Off on WV: State did not justify “officer safety” as reason for entry

E.D.Ky.: Overnight guest ordered out no longer had REP

Defendant was an overnight guest, but the homeowner told him to get out and called the police on him because he was tearing the place up. “The Court finds it doubtful that “society is prepared to recognize as reasonable” Starghill’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Overnight guest ordered out no longer had REP

OR: State const. doesn’t bar checking for warrants during traffic stop

Officers are not prohibited under the state constitution from checking for outstanding warrants during a traffic stop, during a lull or not. There are valid safety and policy reasons for it. State v. Civil, 328 Or App 662, 2023 Ore. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: State const. doesn’t bar checking for warrants during traffic stop

D.Conn.: State constitutional argument has no basis in federal prosecution

In a federal case, defendant’s argument the state Constitution was violated in his search means nothing in a federal criminal prosecution. The search was valid under the Fourth Amendment’s collective knowledge doctrine, and it was properly limited in scope. United … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: State constitutional argument has no basis in federal prosecution

ME: State constitutional arguments must be developed; citing it not enough

(1) The tracking device placed on defendant’s vehicle by court order was with probable cause. (2) “For a claim under the Maine Constitution to be deemed preserved for our review, however, the party advancing the claim cannot merely allude to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ME: State constitutional arguments must be developed; citing it not enough

ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

Defendant’s pleading only the state constitution waived the Fourth Amendment claim. State v. Bell, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 95 (Aug. 15, 2023). Defendant complained trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging a search of house that was allegedly burglarized and defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Pleading only state constitution waived 4A

CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

The government concedes that there was delay during the stop, but it was all without reasonable suspicion. The officer was looking for other summonses on defendant, including child support orders, where he had no idea there were any. “Finally, Deputy … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

W.D.Mo.: No standing in a stolen car

No reasonable expectation of privacy [standing] in a stolen car. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120556 (W.D. Mo. July 13, 2023). On a probation search, “Applying these principles, the Court finds that Brooks has failed to meet … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Due process, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No standing in a stolen car

FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

Defendant sought unsealing of the search warrant affidavit which the state successfully resisted on the ground of informant privilege in other ongoing investigations. The defense never sought in camera review. Without that, the issue was unpreserved for appellate review. Leverette … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, State constitution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL1: If trial court refuses to unseal SW affidavit, in camera review must be sought to preserve issue

NY: Requirement of electronic logging devices of hours trucks are driven is reasonable under NY Const.

Electronic logging devices required under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration adopted in New York survive a facial challenge. “We hold that the warrantless inspections authorized by the regulations fall within the administrative search exception to the warrant requirement and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, State constitution | Comments Off on NY: Requirement of electronic logging devices of hours trucks are driven is reasonable under NY Const.