Monthly Archives: February 2026

IL: Probationer’s ankle monitor search put him at scene of murder

A codefendant was on probation, and a search warrant was used to get information from his ankle monitor. That put him at the scene of a murder. People v. Irby, 2026 IL App (4th) 241389 (Feb. 23, 2026).* Separate exigency … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Probationer’s ankle monitor search put him at scene of murder

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

Defendant’s stop in front of his house on the curtilage was a valid stop. A dog sniff was based on reasonable suspicion but the court finds no valid alert. The search of the car came after an ambiguous statement from … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

E.D.Mo. sustains geofence warrant

Noting Chatrie is pending and that the Eighth Circuit hasn’t ruled, but has in something close, the court denies suppression of a geofence warrant. United States v. Washington, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37462 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 4, 2026)*:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.Mo. sustains geofence warrant

CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

An administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established at the time this one happened. Qualified immunity denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5197 (6th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Not the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Pretext | Comments Off on CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files by Maddie Varner (“The US Justice Department disclosures give fresh clues about how tech companies handle government inquiries about your data.”)

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Wired: Here’s What a Google Subpoena Response Looks Like, Courtesy of the Epstein Files

M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

Defendant’s frisk on entering a VA hospital could be justified as an area entry search, but the facts known to the officers, that defendant was already considered a safety risk, justified it by reasonable suspicion under Terry. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Frisk on entering VA hospital was justified on RS

CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

When a person on parole owns property and lets others use or rent it, the others aren’t subject to the parolee’s search waiver. United States v. Perez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5305 (4th Cir. Feb. 23, 2026):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Leasing property from a parolee doesn’t make that property subject to his parole search condition

D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

Defendant was driving a borrowed car without a valid DL. He still has standing, and that’s not conditioned on a driver’s license. United States v. Huggins, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34758 (D.N.J. Feb. 20, 2026). Defendant’s vehicle was parked unlocked … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

“Considering the totality of the circumstances, there are insufficient facts before the court to establish reasonable suspicion that would allow Officer Embley to prolong the stop and inquire about Kummer’s drug history. Reasonable suspicion is a low standard, but it … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.Utah: Asking about drug history during traffic stop lacked RS and unreasonably extended stop

S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in what is shared with a cloud AI program, even if it’s in anticipation of litigation. Therefore, no attorney-client privilege in what the client shares with AI trying to help his attorney. United … Continue reading

Posted in AI, Apparent authority, Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: No REP in what is shared with a cloud AI program

CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

Plaintiff didn’t sufficiently plead a Fourth Amendment violation and overcoming qualified immunity from the officer’s seizing his notebook and perusing it and handing it to another officer. It’s his burden to deal with qualified immunity, and he didn’t adequately respond. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

An arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest. Hernandez v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. LEXIS 7 (Feb. 19, 2026). There was no rationale entitlement to discovery of the name of the informant in this case, so defense counsel wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on KY: Arrest warrant isn’t constitutionally required for a felony arrest

D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

Plaintiff sued while his criminal trespass case was pending in state municipal court. The action is stayed because plaintiff can raise his constitutional claims there. Younger also counsels that. Spiehs v. Allen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35038 (D. Kan. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Ptf’s § 1983 case stayed where filed while underlying criminal case was ongoing

CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

“The district court correctly held that the officers did not violate Torres’s Fourth Amendment rights by asking him whether he was armed. The officer’s question to Torres, which took no more than three seconds to ask and answer, did not … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Asking whether occupant of car was armed took three seconds and didn’t unreasonably extend stop

E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

Plaintiff finances cars. When Suffolk County seized the cars from the buyers, they were allegedly really slow in returning them to Santander. Plaintiff admits the initial seizure was lawful, so the retention doesn’t ipso facto violate the Fourth Amendment. Santander … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Where property was lawfully seized under 4A, delayed return isn’t a 4A violation

This blog is 23 today

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on This blog is 23 today

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training by Emily Berk & Julianne McShane (On MS.now, he testified that officers were trained to violate the Fourth Amendment.)

Posted in immigration searches | Comments Off on MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

Off-site copying of defendant’s cell phone after the warrant’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B). United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

The state’s claim of exigency from potential destruction of evidence was speculative, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. As to his burglary conviction, it’s harmless, but not as to two other counts. State v. Gilliland, 347 Or. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected