Daily Archives: February 20, 2026

OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

Affidavit for search warrant was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial. It was full of hearsay and the burden for probable cause is too low for reasonable doubt. Also, admitting a video violated the confrontation clause. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

Pole camera observation didn’t violate the Oregon Constitution. State v. Lane, 347 Or. App. 229 (Feb. 19, 2026). Probable cause developed after the stop but before the search under the automobile exception. There was also consent. United States v. Camorlinga, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Pole cameras, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

A search warrant return outside the state law time limit by law is not a Franks issue. United States v. Davis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33100 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 18, 2026). Plaintiff “fails to specifically address, and thus waives any … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue