Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

LA5: Drone video corroborates that car wasn’t searched before warrant arrived

There was probable cause for the search of defendant’s car. He also claimed that the car was searched before the warrant for it issued. Based on a drone video, defendant was Tasered, and an officer opened and closed the car … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Drones, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on LA5: Drone video corroborates that car wasn’t searched before warrant arrived

CA8: In a traffic stop, the passenger can be ordered to stay in the car or get out for officer safety

Defendant passenger’s detention was lawful when the car was stopped because of a warrant on the owner-driver. Being ordered into the car was also reasonable for officer safety. United States v. Negrete, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30736 (8th Cir. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: In a traffic stop, the passenger can be ordered to stay in the car or get out for officer safety

CA10: No standing in real property defs attempted to buy but didn’t and then wouldn’t leave

Defendants lacked standing in the real property they were attempting to buy but the deal fell through. They knew they had to leave and hadn’t yet. They essentially were trespassers, not tenants. United States v. Wahhaj, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: No standing in real property defs attempted to buy but didn’t and then wouldn’t leave

NY4: Def was missing and police couldn’t find him; entry into backyard and then house were reasonable under Mitchell and Brigham City

Applying Mitchell (1976) and Brigham City (2006), it was reasonable for the officer to enter defendant’s fenced back yard after going there on a welfare check first reported by a person claiming defendant was apparently missing. His and his girlfriend’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NY4: Def was missing and police couldn’t find him; entry into backyard and then house were reasonable under Mitchell and Brigham City

MN: Risk of destruction of evidence was exigency for seizure of cell phone

The exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone pending getting a warrant was risk of destruction of evidence. State v. Laflex, 2026 Minn. LEXIS 592 (Sep. 23, 2026). Furtive movements add to reasonable suspicion. Ex parte Lucio, 2026 Tex. Crim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MN: Risk of destruction of evidence was exigency for seizure of cell phone

TN: Bailbond bounty hunter not state actor

Bailbonding agent’s bounty hunters were not state actors in capturing defendant and searching his car. State v. Dragg, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 637 (Sep. 24, 2026). Defendant’s post-conviction petition argues defense counsel applied the wrong standard of review but … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Bailbond bounty hunter not state actor

MS: Execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get suspect’s CSLI

Defendant’s allegedly committing an execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get his CSLI at that moment to locate him. Carpenter recognized exigency exceptions. Anderson v. State, 2026 Miss. App. LEXIS 406 (Sep. 15, 2026). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on MS: Execution style murder in public in broad daylight was exigency to get suspect’s CSLI

CA3: Ptfs pled a 4A claim for CPS workers demanding entry without sufficient exigency

Plaintiffs plausibly pled violations of the Fourth Amendment for child protective services demanding and gaining entry into the home without a sufficient showing of exigency to protect the children. Also, the special needs doctrine doesn’t apply here. O’Bryant v. N.J. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Ptfs pled a 4A claim for CPS workers demanding entry without sufficient exigency

FL4: Officer’s two-hour delay in seeking BAC SW wasn’t itself exigency

Officers called a state’s attorney for advice on a BAC blood draw and were told to get a warrant. After waiting two hours, they decided they had exigent circumstances. Suppressed and affirmed. State v. Marlin, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 6797 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Mootness, Waiver | Comments Off on FL4: Officer’s two-hour delay in seeking BAC SW wasn’t itself exigency

CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

Plaintiff’s claim of being forced to do a drug test but not for protection of the children she cared for stated a claim and survived summary judgment. Knighton v. Benton Cty., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23741 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Ptf’s forced drug test wasn’t justified by exigent circumstances

M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

In this anticipatory warrant case, the package was delivered to the target residence but then moved to another residence. That created exigent circumstances for entry without a warrant. Officers also did a protective sweep and retreated to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Package covered by anticipatory warrant was moved to another house, and exigency permitted warrantless entry to seize

NY1: 911 call about shooting in apartment building led officers to def’s apartment and exigency justified entry

“The record supports the court’s conclusion that the warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment was justified under the emergency doctrine …. The officers received a 911 call reporting that someone was shot in the building; found a bullet on the floor … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NY1: 911 call about shooting in apartment building led officers to def’s apartment and exigency justified entry

MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

In a domestic dispute, officers had exigent circumstances to enter on the totality of circumstances. Defendant challenged them one-by-one, but the totality applies. State v. Friscia, 2026 MT 158 (July 21, 2026). It was not reasonably subject to dispute that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MT: Exigency is found in the totality of circumstances

D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

The government’s subpoena for defendant’s juvenile case records is granted. The government can show relevance and admissibility at trial. Defendant focuses on his Fourth Amendment claim which is rejected. No case says there is a reasonable expectation of privacy against … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Obtaining def’s juvenile records by subpoena is not a “search”; no REP

W.D.N.Y.: Possibility of co-conspirators in mass murder justified emergency disclosure request to Apple, Verizon, and Facebook

In the Buffalo Tops Grocery mass shooting, the emergency disclosure request to Apple, Facebook, and Verizon was based on the possibility there were coconspirators. Even though defendant’s manifesto said he was acting alone, investigators didn’t have to take that at … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Possibility of co-conspirators in mass murder justified emergency disclosure request to Apple, Verizon, and Facebook

E.D.N.Y.: Flight out a window is exigency for police to enter

Defendant was wanted for a shooting incident in Flatbush, Brooklyn caught on video. When they came to where they suspected he was, he attempted to flee out a window. That gave exigency to enter. United States v. Richard, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Flight out a window is exigency for police to enter

DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

Warrantless entry to detain a DUI suspect was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Claiming exigency isn’t enough. State v. Beasley, 2026 Del. C.P. LEXIS 8 (Del. C.P. June 16, 2026). This defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy in someone … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on DE: Warrantless entry in DUI case unreasonable

E.D.Mich.: Missing 14 yo cell phone pinging at def’s house was exigency for entry to find her

There was exigency for entry into defendant’s home when a missing autistic 14 year old’s cell phone was pinging at defendant’s address and there was no answer to the phone. Officers don’t have to wait for the exigency to get … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Missing 14 yo cell phone pinging at def’s house was exigency for entry to find her

D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

Here, the officer in a traffic stop wanted to run defendant’s LPN through ALPRs to determine whether the travel was as stated. There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 15 minutes for that. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Automatic license plate readers, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

NY1: Gunshot through floor from apartment above was exigency

Exigency justified entry into defendant’s apartment. The tenant below called 911 to report a shooting down through his ceiling and gunshots above. People v. Santiago, 2026 NY Slip Op 03398 (1st Dept. June 2, 2026). “Ms. Sandoval next asserts that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on NY1: Gunshot through floor from apartment above was exigency