Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

The government showed exigency for what they feared was imminent destruction of drugs for a warrantless entry and protective sweep. Then a warrant was obtained with probable cause. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163658 (N.D. Ga. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Pretext, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

CO: Second entry after seeing a dead dog in def’s yard was without exigency and suppressed

The officer’s first approach to defendant’s door was a knock-and-talk, and he could see a dead dog which he checked on and confirmed. The trip to the front door was not to gather information en route. The warrantless entry coming … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Second entry after seeing a dead dog in def’s yard was without exigency and suppressed

MA: There was exigency and more for a welfare check entry under Caniglia

A welfare check at defendant’s father’s house led to police entering without a warrant. “[O]fficers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that the victim was in his house and in need of emergency assistance. Although the police may no … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: There was exigency and more for a welfare check entry under Caniglia

OH8: Citizen informant’s 911 call was RS under Navarette

The citizen informant’s 911 call that defendant was drunk, belligerent, and driving gave reasonable suspicion to stop defendant under Naverette. City of Parma v. Coyne, 2024-Ohio-3192, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3019 (8th Dist. Aug. 22, 2024). “And here, even expunging … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Citizen informant’s 911 call was RS under Navarette

CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

Officers responded to a domestic disturbance call and heard shouting inside that made them believe there was a fight inside. Summary judgment for the officers in a warrantless entry case was properly granted. Ramirez v. Killian, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

CA7: Franks does not apply to emergency cell phone pings

During the George Floyd murder unrest, defendant told an acquaintance he was traveling to Wisconsin with a machine gun to kill and loot. The acquaintance told law enforcement. They obtained ping information based on exigency, which was valid. Also, Franks … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA7: Franks does not apply to emergency cell phone pings

CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

Knowing of a search starts the statute of limitations for any claim on it. Reguli v. Russ, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19008 (6th Cir. July 31, 2024). Defendant waived his motion to suppress by not adequately supporting it with factual … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

New arguments raised at the suppression hearing are considered waived. Even if it was considered, it lacks merit: The officer could open the car for a check for other passengers for officer safety. United States v. Hargraves, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

NJ: Entry into garage to make a DUI arrest violated 4A and state const.

Defendant was convicted of DUI. Acting on a tip of erratic driving by a particular LPN, the officer went into her garage and entered it to investigate and then make the arrest. There were no exigent circumstances like a medical … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NJ: Entry into garage to make a DUI arrest violated 4A and state const.

CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

The fact the drug dog here had only a 59% (or 80%) success rate is still probable cause. The fact a dog can’t tell the difference between legal and illegal cannabis is of no moment. It’s still probable cause. United … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

Plaintiff was seen open carrying on a bicycle, and the officer attempted to stop him. The officer later got information on plaintiff from a store he’d been in. None of that violated the Second or Fourth Amendment. Glover v. Fidaannd, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

CA5: Exigency is measured objectively, not subjectively

“Borden argues the officers’ actions indicate they did not actually think a medical emergency existed, but their subjective beliefs are irrelevant. See Toussaint, 838 F.3d at 509. Given the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable view of the evidence supports … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Exigency is measured objectively, not subjectively

CA7: Manual border search of cell phone revealing CP was reasonable

Manual border search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable and revealed child pornography, and that justification for a more intensive search. United States v. Mendez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14058 (7th Cir. June 10, 2024). Defendant rented his hotel room, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Manual border search of cell phone revealing CP was reasonable

Three on exigency

The emergency aid exception permitted entry into victim’s home. She hadn’t been seen all day and her child was unaccounted for. This entry was objectively reasonable, and the police were not required to use alternate means to seek to find … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Private search | Comments Off on Three on exigency

D.Alaska: Protective sweep after def’s arrest not justified, but there was exigency otherwise

The entry into the house was reasonable because of exigent circumstances because of ongoing drug operations there. Protective sweep is rejected because the defendant had already been arrested by the time the sweep occurred. United States v. Avitia-Enriquez, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Protective sweep after def’s arrest not justified, but there was exigency otherwise

ND: Warrantless entry into garage to investigate driving on a suspended license unreasonable

Officers had probable cause to believe defendant was driving on a suspended DL, and they were parked outside his house and watched him drive into his garage. There was no exigency for the police entry into his garage to arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Custody, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Warrantless entry into garage to investigate driving on a suspended license unreasonable

OH1: A malnourished child isn’t exigency for an infant

“The facts of this case are more akin to the situation in Fisher. While a report of a malnourished infant is certainly cause for concern, no one testified that that the infant would not survive without immediate medical intervention. Rather, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: A malnourished child isn’t exigency for an infant

N.D.Ohio: Heroin and three guns in plain view was exigency for entry with child alone inside

Police knowing that defendant’s 12-year-old son was in the house alone with a significant quantity of heroin and three firearms all in plain view was exigency for entry. There also previous complaints to Family Services. United States v. Woodard, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Heroin and three guns in plain view was exigency for entry with child alone inside

OH2: Police responding to report of shot dog who heard an animal had exigency to enter the curtilage

“Based upon the evidence presented, we conclude the trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. The search of the home and surrounding premises was reasonable because the officers believed an injured animal was on the premises … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Police responding to report of shot dog who heard an animal had exigency to enter the curtilage

NY3: SW for person doesn’t include body cavity search unless reason for such search was shown

“Even where a search warrant has been previously obtained, it is axiomatic that such ‘warrant exists and is required not simply to permit, but to circumscribe police intrusions’ …. Here, the search warrant that had been previously obtained authorized the … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: SW for person doesn’t include body cavity search unless reason for such search was shown