Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

The officer’s body slam of a resisting minor suspect about half his weight was entitled to qualified immunity. “But even if the facts of our case did fit Richmond, the statement that ‘less force is appropriate’ would not put every … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

E.D.Va.: Govt showed exigency for access to public Facebook messages in terrorism investigation

The court assumes defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his private Facebook messages, but holds he did not in his non-private ones. Still, the government successfully argued that it had exigent circumstances for Facebook to reveal messages under … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Govt showed exigency for access to public Facebook messages in terrorism investigation

D.S.D.: Resistance to a frisk can help justify it

Aside from there being a basis for a frisk, defendant’s resistance to it justified it under circuit precedent. United States v. Gatnoor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191729 (D.S.D. Oct. 18, 2024). “We agree that, on this record, Burks failed to … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Resistance to a frisk can help justify it

AZ: ALPR info from DEA could contribute to RS

A state officer running defendant’s car’s LPN through DEASIL (Drug Enforcement Agency Special Intelligence Link) showing its movements can contribute to reasonable suspicion. (Here, the vehicle was on a drug courier route twice before.) Also, defendant borrowed the car for … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: ALPR info from DEA could contribute to RS

NC: Defendant abandoned this real property

Defendant abandoned this real property. State v. Moore, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 806 (Oct. 15, 2024). Failure to renew a motion to suppress when the evidence is offered is waiver in this state. State v. Rowdy, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on NC: Defendant abandoned this real property

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases in Alaska. Alaska R.E. 412. O’Brien v. Delaplain, 2024 Alas. LEXIS 99 n.35(Sep. 27, 2024). The officer’s observations on a table near the door from outside the dwelling during a knock-and-talk provided … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

D.D.C.: Even if electronic search protocol is a const’l requirement, GFE applies

The lack of an electronics search protocol in the warrant, even if it was constitutionally required, doesn’t even have to be decided because of the good faith exception. “Okafor suggests that the Constitution might nonetheless demand that a warrant specify … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Even if electronic search protocol is a const’l requirement, GFE applies

CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry

“Our scrupulous examination of the entire record supports the court’s conclusion that the officers had reasonable cause to believe that the dogs contained within the barn were in imminent harm and neglected, or cruelly treated.” City of Middletown v. Wagner, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Waiver | Comments Off on CT: Exigency shown for animal control entry

CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

Plaintiff’s being on a no-fly list wasn’t reasonable suspicion to detain him on the highway. Meshal v. Commissioner, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23486 (11th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). “[T]he officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment because his warrantless entry … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

The government showed exigency for what they feared was imminent destruction of drugs for a warrantless entry and protective sweep. Then a warrant was obtained with probable cause. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163658 (N.D. Ga. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Pretext, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

CO: Second entry after seeing a dead dog in def’s yard was without exigency and suppressed

The officer’s first approach to defendant’s door was a knock-and-talk, and he could see a dead dog which he checked on and confirmed. The trip to the front door was not to gather information en route. The warrantless entry coming … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Second entry after seeing a dead dog in def’s yard was without exigency and suppressed

MA: There was exigency and more for a welfare check entry under Caniglia

A welfare check at defendant’s father’s house led to police entering without a warrant. “[O]fficers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that the victim was in his house and in need of emergency assistance. Although the police may no … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: There was exigency and more for a welfare check entry under Caniglia

OH8: Citizen informant’s 911 call was RS under Navarette

The citizen informant’s 911 call that defendant was drunk, belligerent, and driving gave reasonable suspicion to stop defendant under Naverette. City of Parma v. Coyne, 2024-Ohio-3192, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3019 (8th Dist. Aug. 22, 2024). “And here, even expunging … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH8: Citizen informant’s 911 call was RS under Navarette

CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

Officers responded to a domestic disturbance call and heard shouting inside that made them believe there was a fight inside. Summary judgment for the officers in a warrantless entry case was properly granted. Ramirez v. Killian, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Sounds of a fight inside at a domestic call justified this warrantless entry

CA7: Franks does not apply to emergency cell phone pings

During the George Floyd murder unrest, defendant told an acquaintance he was traveling to Wisconsin with a machine gun to kill and loot. The acquaintance told law enforcement. They obtained ping information based on exigency, which was valid. Also, Franks … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA7: Franks does not apply to emergency cell phone pings

CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

Knowing of a search starts the statute of limitations for any claim on it. Reguli v. Russ, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19008 (6th Cir. July 31, 2024). Defendant waived his motion to suppress by not adequately supporting it with factual … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Knowing of a search starts the SoL from any claim on it

D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

New arguments raised at the suppression hearing are considered waived. Even if it was considered, it lacks merit: The officer could open the car for a check for other passengers for officer safety. United States v. Hargraves, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Del.: Officer could open car door for officer safety to insure there was no one else inside

NJ: Entry into garage to make a DUI arrest violated 4A and state const.

Defendant was convicted of DUI. Acting on a tip of erratic driving by a particular LPN, the officer went into her garage and entered it to investigate and then make the arrest. There were no exigent circumstances like a medical … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NJ: Entry into garage to make a DUI arrest violated 4A and state const.

CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

The fact the drug dog here had only a 59% (or 80%) success rate is still probable cause. The fact a dog can’t tell the difference between legal and illegal cannabis is of no moment. It’s still probable cause. United … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation

Plaintiff was seen open carrying on a bicycle, and the officer attempted to stop him. The officer later got information on plaintiff from a store he’d been in. None of that violated the Second or Fourth Amendment. Glover v. Fidaannd, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA3: Getting ptf’s personal information from third parties after he was seen open carrying was not 2A or 4A violation