Category Archives: Automobile exception

CA9: When the PC for SW dissipates, the search must stop; no GFE

“This case raises the familiar, but always troubling, question whether someone can be prosecuted for despicable criminal conduct using evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Here, officers conducting a search of Defendant John Holcomb’s computer, pursuant to a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: When the PC for SW dissipates, the search must stop; no GFE

OH2: Stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction doesn’t violate 4A

A traffic stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. State v. Sexton, 2026-Ohio-2636, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 2551 (2d Dist. July 10, 2026). A habeas petitioner has no right to discovery of search warrant affidavits. Moreover, he … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH2: Stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction doesn’t violate 4A

TX3: DUI blood draw while in restraint chair not 4A unreasonable

Taking defendant’s blood for DUI at the station house by warrant when he was in a restraint chair didn’t make the search unreasonable. Hildebrandt v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 5866 (Tex. App. – Austin June 25, 2026). A Ring … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX3: DUI blood draw while in restraint chair not 4A unreasonable

CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

A boat tied to a dock is subject to the vehicle exception even if somebody lives on it. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11866 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2026). Officers don’t have to piecemeal the exigency for … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

CA9: Illegal arrest doesn’t justify dismissal of indictment

An illegal arrest doesn’t justify dismissing an indictment. He also did not show outrageous governmental conduct. United States v. Colfax, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11426 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2026). The officer knew Dodge pickup trucks, and the registration on … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Illegal arrest doesn’t justify dismissal of indictment

S.D.N.Y.: Constant surveillance of a car not needed for PC

There was probable cause for search of an Uber for drugs based on police surveillance. Defendant’s mention of supposed gaps in surveillance don’t mitigate the probable cause. “Their lack of an airtight case against the defendant, at the time of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Independent source, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Constant surveillance of a car not needed for PC

Cal.2: Officers didn’t need to periodically reassess exigency

Exigency here did not need to be periodically reassessed. “Once inside, police were not required to interrupt their efforts to seek a warrant. Officers on the scene must be able to devote their full attention to the threat they face. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on Cal.2: Officers didn’t need to periodically reassess exigency

D.Minn.: Def arrested away from his motorcycle couldn’t have his attached backpack inventoried

Defendant was on the patio of a bar drinking a beer, and his motorcycle was 50-100′ away with his backpack on it. He was arrested, and he’d arranged for others to take his motorcycle. The backpack was seized and searched. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def arrested away from his motorcycle couldn’t have his attached backpack inventoried

The automobile exception is 101 today

See the 100th Anniversary post.

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on The automobile exception is 101 today

OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

The smell of burnt marijuana justified the search of defendant’s car even though none was found. State v. Dejournett, 2026-Ohio-640 (9th Dist. Feb. 25, 2026).* An empty beer can in the beverage holder doesn’t justify a search of the car. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

Defendant was driving a borrowed car without a valid DL. He still has standing, and that’s not conditioned on a driver’s license. United States v. Huggins, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34758 (D.N.J. Feb. 20, 2026). Defendant’s vehicle was parked unlocked … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: One without a DL can still have standing in the car he’s driving

OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

Pole camera observation didn’t violate the Oregon Constitution. State v. Lane, 347 Or. App. 229 (Feb. 19, 2026). Probable cause developed after the stop but before the search under the automobile exception. There was also consent. United States v. Camorlinga, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Pole cameras, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

The search of defendant’s car was unreasonable under the automobile exception because there was no probable cause to believe drugs or other evidence would be found there. Also, the inventory was invalid. United States v. Lujan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying. (This is after a remand for a probable cause finding. The court also discusses the good faith exception and the court must guard against the exception swallowing the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on NC: Temporary immobility of a car doesn’t prevent the automobile exception from applying

TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

Defense counsel’s motion to suppress coming during trial at the end of the officer’s testimony wasn’t timely. Brown v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 1014 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Feb. 3, 2026)* (unpublished). An automobile exception search can … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, DNA, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

Cal.: Loose MJ on a car floorboard is not a violation of the MJ “open container” provision

“Enacted as part of California’s legalization of marijuana, Health and Safety Code section 11362.3, subdivision (a)(4) makes it an infraction to have an ‘open container’ of marijuana in a vehicle. The question before us is whether a small amount of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.: Loose MJ on a car floorboard is not a violation of the MJ “open container” provision

D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

There was probable cause for the stop and search of defendant’s car before the pretextual stop. Therefore, it was all valid. United States v. Nieves, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 272309 (D. Minn. Dec. 1, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

Responding to a call, defendant fairly matched the description. When he would not identify himself, it was reasonable to handcuff him for a few minutes while it was sorted out. United States v. Troupe, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9010 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

Pennsylvania’s automobile exception is more stringent than the Fourth Amendment requiring exigency. The state can’t end run a refusal to consent by impounding a car to get into it. Commonwealth v. Rosario, 2025 PA Super 286 (Dec. 23, 2025). “First, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception