CA8: Nebraska statute allowing SWs to cross state lines doesn’t violate 4A

Nebraska statute authorizes search warrants to cross state lines, and this does not violate the Fourth Amendment. This was a Snapchat warrant. [The Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2703(a,d), allows state subpoenas to cross state lines.] United States v. Peterson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24711 (8th Cir. Aug. 17, 2026).

Five phones were seized. “Human error” led to misidentifying one of them on defendant’s consent form. The consent was invalid because it was the wrong phone. United States v. Morales-Aguirre, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184752 (D.N.M. Aug. 17, 2026).*

Officers had a person warrant for defendant with a 10 pm limit. It was executed at 9:49, and defendant’s flight didn’t make it unreasonable to search the belongings he left behind when he fled. United States v. Klapman, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183516 (D. Mass. Aug. 17, 2026).*

License plate propped in the window was still reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. Hudson v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 444 (Aug. 18, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.