Daily Archives: February 23, 2026

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training by Emily Berk & Julianne McShane (On MS.now, he testified that officers were trained to violate the Fourth Amendment.)

Posted in immigration searches | Comments Off on MS.now: ICE whistleblower testifies to Congress about minimal training [including violating 4A]

CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

Off-site copying of defendant’s cell phone after the warrant’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B). United States v. Hernandez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Off-site copying of def’s cell phone after the SW’s expiration date was permitted by Rule 41(e)(2)(B).

OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected

The state’s claim of exigency from potential destruction of evidence was speculative, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. As to his burglary conviction, it’s harmless, but not as to two other counts. State v. Gilliland, 347 Or. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OR: Exigency here was speculative and rejected