Daily Archives: February 26, 2026

N.D. Iowa: Drug dog’s 50% hit rate was reliable enough

Past cases in this circuit hold that even a drug dog’s 50% hit rate is sufficient for probable cause. “And other indications of the presence of illicit drugs can rehabilitate a less-than-reliable canine alert.” United States v. Harbach, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D. Iowa: Drug dog’s 50% hit rate was reliable enough

CA6: Ptf’s expert in a civil Franks claim only provided a legal conclusion, and “That’s not enough”

Plaintiff in a civil Franks claim failed to show that the officer knowingly misrepresented facts. Of note, however, is that he used an expert witness on falsity which essentially only provided a legal conclusion. Chancellor v. Geelhood, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf’s expert in a civil Franks claim only provided a legal conclusion, and “That’s not enough”

OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

The smell of burnt marijuana justified the search of defendant’s car even though none was found. State v. Dejournett, 2026-Ohio-640 (9th Dist. Feb. 25, 2026).* An empty beer can in the beverage holder doesn’t justify a search of the car. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: Smell of burnt MJ justified search even though officers found none

GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

Private search: Defendant let someone use his computer and that person found two incriminating letters which were turned over to the police. Bunn v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Feb. 25, 2026).* The parties agreed that references to the … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

WaPo reporter search warrant: The government failed to even acknowledge the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 in its warrant application. “The government’s conduct has disturbed that baseline posture of deference” that it always gets. In re Search of the Real … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: WaPo SW: gov’t squandered deference by failing to cite Privacy Protection Act

D.S.D.: Volatile home situation justified sweep for gun

A volatile situation in the house justified an exigency search (or sweep) of other rooms for a weapon. United States v. Boyd, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38079 (D.S.D. Feb. 23, 2026).* 2254 petitioner’s CSLI claim and trial were all before … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Volatile home situation justified sweep for gun

IL: Probationer’s ankle monitor search put him at scene of murder

A codefendant was on probation, and a search warrant was used to get information from his ankle monitor. That put him at the scene of a murder. People v. Irby, 2026 IL App (4th) 241389 (Feb. 23, 2026).* Separate exigency … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Probationer’s ankle monitor search put him at scene of murder

W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

The government seized this Oklahoman’s cell phone and searched it with a warrant. Oklahoma is largely marijuana legal. Pleading the crime-fraud exception, the government bears the burden of segregating the valid conversations from the federal conspiracy allegations. Defendant bears no … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Def bears no burden on applying crime-fraud exception to his cell phone search

S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

Defendant’s stop in front of his house on the curtilage was a valid stop. A dog sniff was based on reasonable suspicion but the court finds no valid alert. The search of the car came after an ambiguous statement from … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: No dog alert shown on video

E.D.Mo. sustains geofence warrant

Noting Chatrie is pending and that the Eighth Circuit hasn’t ruled, but has in something close, the court denies suppression of a geofence warrant. United States v. Washington, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37462 (E.D. Mo. Feb. 4, 2026)*:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.Mo. sustains geofence warrant