Daily Archives: February 28, 2026

D.N.M.: Suit over search in pending criminal case barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s first Fourth Amendment claim failed under Heck. He amended the complaint and still doesn’t overcome it. His claim of failure to train in serving search warrants is conclusory and doesn’t state a claim either. Flores v. Wood, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Suit over search in pending criminal case barred by Heck

CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

While Georgia law requires a misdemeanor offense be in the presence of the officer, the Fourth Amendment does not. The arrest was constitutionally valid. Middlebrooks v. Kasmar, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5855 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2026). There was information … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

NH: Trial court didn’t err in allowing officer to testify to what geolocation information meant here: def was in victim’s house

The victim found an intruder in his home, and called the police. The intruder got away. The police sought geolocation information from Google on all phones at the house, and defendant’s phone came up. The officer called defendant. This was … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Geolocation data, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on NH: Trial court didn’t err in allowing officer to testify to what geolocation information meant here: def was in victim’s house

TX14: No REP in electronic monitoring while on pretrial release

Defendant on electronic monitoring as a bond condition has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the GPS information. Hawkins v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 1874 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Feb. 26, 2026) (substituted opinion on rehearing), UPDATE: … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on TX14: No REP in electronic monitoring while on pretrial release

E.D.Mich.: Typo in SW affidavit didn’t justify Franks hearing

A single error in a warrant affidavit that should be characterized as a typo and not a false statement doesn’t justify a Franks hearing. United States v. McClain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39891 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2026). Defendant had … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Typo in SW affidavit didn’t justify Franks hearing

IN: Inventory here was valid despite fact car was first impounded but then not towed after all

The inventory search of this car in anticipation of impoundment was overall reasonable, despite the fact that the car ultimately was not impounded. It might prove pretext, but it didn’t here. [This is fact heavy, and interesting reading.] Stokes v. … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Pretext | Comments Off on IN: Inventory here was valid despite fact car was first impounded but then not towed after all

DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

“There can be little question that the police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s car contained evidence of a crime. Four cars parked along the street, including Mr. Turner’s Lexus, were struck by bullets in a drive-by shooting. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: “police had probable cause to believe that Mr. Turner’s bullet-riddled car might contain bullet fragments from the shooting”

N.D.Iowa: When an officer has PC for a stop and search, the 4A doesn’t require that it happen at the earliest possible time

When an officer has probable cause for a stop and search, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that it happen at the earliest possible time. It doesn’t become “stale” that fast, and here it was ongoing: driving on a suspended DL. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: When an officer has PC for a stop and search, the 4A doesn’t require that it happen at the earliest possible time

WI: Google’s scans of user content for CSAM is a private search

It’s a private search when Google scans user consent for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and then it reports to law enforcement what it finds. It is not required to search, only to report what it finds. [Note that the … Continue reading

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on WI: Google’s scans of user content for CSAM is a private search

E.D.Tenn.: Traffic stop with shots fired call led to valid protective sweep of car for weapon on RS

“After reviewing the evidence, the arguments of the parties, and the relevant law, the undersigned finds that the officers had both probable cause to believe Defendant had committed traffic violations and reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle in connection with … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Traffic stop with shots fired call led to valid protective sweep of car for weapon on RS

MN: No REP in text message in recipient’s device

The sender of an electronic message has no reasonable expectation of privacy in it where it ends up. State v. Bonnell, 2026 Minn. LEXIS 69 (Feb. 25, 2026):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on MN: No REP in text message in recipient’s device

CA8: Duty to warn of use of police dog was clearly established

Officers sicced a police dog on plaintiff who was fleeing, but without warning. Use of a police dog usually requires a warning. “The warning requirement was clearly established by the time of Cameron’s arrest. As we stated in Adams, Kuha … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Duty to warn of use of police dog was clearly established