CA6: Administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established as 4A violation

An administrative search that is a ruse for a criminal search was clearly established at the time this one happened. Qualified immunity denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5197 (6th Cir. Feb. 19, 2026).

Not the court’s words, but: Defendant’s arguments about alternative theories about the meaning of the facts in the affidavit for warrant amount to speculation and not even an offer proof for a Franks violation. United States v. Knight, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35378 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2026).* Of similar tenor: United States v. Gogolack, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35413 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2026),* a connected case, with different speculation.

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a backpack he apparently dumped in hiding from the police. United States v. Méndez-Rodríguez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35561 (D.P.R. Feb. 20, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Pretext. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.