For originalists, is using the military to conduct arrests and detentions in the U.S. a “reasonable search and seizure”?

Reuters: Republican Rand Paul opposes Trump talk of using military in deportations by Bo Erickson (“A 19th century U.S. law prohibits federal troops from being used in domestic law enforcement except when authorized by Congress. [¶] Paul, at times a maverick within his party, noted that he supports the idea of deporting people living in the United States illegally who have criminal records, but said that law enforcement authorities are better equipped than the military to carry out that role and to heed the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. There is a “distrust of putting the Army into our streets” among Americans, Paul said.”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on For originalists, is using the military to conduct arrests and detentions in the U.S. a “reasonable search and seizure”?

CA10: “Bivens is now all but dead.”

“Bivens is now all but dead.” Rowland v. Matevousian, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29406 (10th Cir. Nov. 19, 2024). But we already knew that. Not a Fourth Amendment case, but a prison denial of medical care, but that’s where Bivens been going for several years now:

Continue reading
Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA10: “Bivens is now all but dead.”

IN: Handswabbing for evidence doesn’t require advice of rights under state constitution

Handswabbing didn’t require advice of Pirtle rights under Indiana Constitution. DNA swabs don’t. Owens v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 316 (Nov. 20, 2024).*

The false statements in the affidavit for warrant were neither reckless nor intentional nor even material. United States v. Clanton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212304 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2024).*

Because seized evidence could be used in case of a reversal of the conviction, return is denied for now. State v. Humphrey, 2024-Ohio-5510 (2d Dist. Nov. 22, 2024).*

Defendant doesn’t show why intermediate discretionary appellate review of his Franks challenge is necessary. State v. Rekieta, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 505 (Nov. 19, 2024).*

Posted in DNA, Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, State constitution | Comments Off on IN: Handswabbing for evidence doesn’t require advice of rights under state constitution

D.Me.: State mandated GPS tracking of lobster boats reasonable under closely regulated business exception

Under the closely regulated business exception, the State of Maine can require lobsterman to have GPS tracking on their boats. (It’s an important question and the plaintiffs are urged to appeal to the First Circuit.) Thompson v. Keliher, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211714 (D. Me. Nov. 21, 2024).

Defense counsel at trial likely was ineffective in not discovering there was a search warrant for defendant’s phone, but, on this record, it wouldn’t change the result. There’s plenty of evidence to support the conviction besides that. Buford v. State, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 519 (Nov. 21, 2024).*

“It is undisputed that the initial seizure of the Vehicle was lawful, so a Fourth Amendment seizure claim based on the Vehicle’s unlawful retention cannot stand. See Shaul, 363 F.3d at 187. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted to Defendants on Santander’s Fourth Amendment claim. But Santander is not without recourse, for the Fourteenth Amendment affords it a ‘right with respect to a government agency’s retention of lawfully seized property.’ Shaul, 363 F.3d at 187; see also Bennett, 832 F. App’x at 60.” Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. City of Yonkers, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211330 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2024).*

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Me.: State mandated GPS tracking of lobster boats reasonable under closely regulated business exception

IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

Officers checked a law enforcement database and found an arrest warrant on defendant. They rechecked. Afterward, it turned out the warrant had been recalled but was still in the system due to a clerical error. The court will not suppress because the exclusionary rule is to remedy police misconduct, and there isn’t any here. People v. Nash, 2024 IL App (4th) 221078, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS 2602 (Nov. 21, 2024).

“The Court determines that from the DEA investigation, probable cause existed for Jimerson’s arrest. The DEA corroborated its tips from confidential sources by conducting surveillance of Jimerson’s residence, obtained conversations between Jimerson and those sources regarding the transactions, and observed several people arriving at the residence empty-handed or with large suitcases and leaving with bags. Based on these facts, the Court concludes that a reasonable officer would conclude that there was ‘a substantial chance of criminal activity’ occurring at Jimerson’s Cahokia residence.” Defendant’s stop was valid under Tenth Circuit caselaw, no matter how compelling he thinks other circuits cases are. United States v. Jimerson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211523 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2024).*

The affidavit for search warrant provides sufficient detail for probable cause to show reliance on it was in good faith. State v. Cheley, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1984 (La. App. 3 Cir Nov. 20, 2024).*

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

OH1: Smoking MJ in public and jaywalking was RS for a patdown

“Mr. King challenges the foundation for the Terry stop, emphasizing that smoking marijuana in public and jaywalking are not arrestable offenses. True enough, but officers can issue tickets for both offenses. Cincinnati Mun.Code § 506-46 and 512-1; R.C. 3780.99(B). And while an individual may carry a firearm in Ohio under a variety of circumstances, carrying a gun while smoking marijuana gives rise to a reasonable concern that the individual might be using weapons while intoxicated in violation of R.C. 2923.15(A).” State v. King, 2024-Ohio-5459 (1st Dist. Nov. 20, 2024).*

Defendant’s claim the officer unreasonably detained him by holding on to his parolee identification was rejected. His claim in his reply brief that the officer lacked probable cause for a search incident was waived by not raising it below and sooner. State v. Chism, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 512 (Nov. 19, 2024).*

Inventory can be an independent basis for a search. “The police department’s standard procedure dictates that an inventory search must be performed when police determine a vehicle must be towed, regardless of the reason for the initial call to the scene.” Commonwealth v. Wilson, 2024 PA Super 278, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 511 (Nov. 20, 2024).*

Posted in Inventory, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH1: Smoking MJ in public and jaywalking was RS for a patdown

LA5: Defense attorney’s email about evidence on phone not protected by attorney-client privilege

A defense attorney’s email about evidence on a cell phone was used to get authority to search and seize the phone. Defendant claimed privilege; the state claimed that defense counsel was obligated to turn over material evidence. It was not privileged information. State v. Landon, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1953, 2024 WL 4835521 (La. App. 5 Cir Nov. 19, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on LA5: Defense attorney’s email about evidence on phone not protected by attorney-client privilege

Reason: Justice Department Orders DEA to Halt Airport Searches Because of ‘Significant Issues’ With Cash Seizures

Reason: Justice Department Orders DEA to Halt Airport Searches Because of ‘Significant Issues’ With Cash Seizures by C.J. Ciaramella (“The DEA paid one airline employee tens of thousands of dollars to snoop on travel itineraries and flag passengers for searches.” “The Justice Department has ordered the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to suspend most searches of passengers at airports and other mass transit hubs after an independent investigation found DEA task forces weren’t documenting searches and weren’t properly trained, creating a significant risk of constitutional violations and lawsuits.”)

Posted in Airport searches, Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Justice Department Orders DEA to Halt Airport Searches Because of ‘Significant Issues’ With Cash Seizures

MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

Defendant didn’t object pretrial or at trial to the search, and he can’t argue plain error now. State v. Lane, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 837 (Nov. 19, 2024).

The finding defendant was stopped because of a seatbelt violation is not clearly erroneous. His pretext argument fails. A bag of crack was in plain view. United States v. Noel, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29425 (6th Cir. Nov. 19, 2024).*

A state trooper made an objectively reasonable mistake under Heien in stopping a vehicle during Covid with an expired inspection more than a year earlier. “Based on the unique facts presented in this case, and limited to these facts, following our de novo review we cannot conclude that the circuit court’s decision to deny petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence from the stop that occurred in this case was in error; it was supported by substantial evidence and was based on the court’s interpretation and application of our law and that of the Supreme Court in Heien. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s order denying petitioner’s motion to suppress based on the court’s conclusion that the trooper had a reasonable suspicion to stop petitioner’s vehicle, and the reasonable suspicion rested on an objectively reasonable mistaken understanding of whether West Virginia Code section 17C-16-1 was suspended by Executive Order No. 7-20 at the time of the stop.” State v. Taylor, 2024 W. Va. LEXIS 508 (Nov. 20, 2024) (unpublished).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Mistake of law, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Plain error doesn’t revive a waived search claim

PA: Merely reaching in car to secure gun in plain view was reasonable under state’s more stringent automobile exception

It was reasonable for the officer to reach in an open door and secure a gun seen in plain view under Pennsylvania’s more stringent automobile exception. Commonwealth v. Saunders, 2024 Pa. LEXIS 1734 (Nov. 20, 2024) (and there’s three opinions; from the majority):

Continue reading
Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, State constitution | Comments Off on PA: Merely reaching in car to secure gun in plain view was reasonable under state’s more stringent automobile exception

N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

Shareholders cannot bring a Fourth Amendment claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party. Elfand v. Adams, 2024 NY Slip Op 24289, 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 19021 (N.Y. Co. Nov. 18, 2024).

The CI’s information led to a controlled buy, but this doesn’t allow discovery of identity. United States v. Warner, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209725 (D. Neb. Nov. 19, 2024).*

Defendant’s girlfriend had enough common authority over the premises to consent to its search. State v. Brashear, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 2215 (Nov. 19, 2024).*

Defendant was constitutionally seized when he was seen. He was known to the police and he was wearing a wig to hide his identity, and he was known to have an arrest warrant outstanding. State v. Stanley, 2024 MT 271 (Nov. 19, 2024).*

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.Y.Co.: Shareholders cannot bring a 4A claim on behalf of a corporation that isn’t a party

W.D.Pa.: Protective sweep of house was reasonable despite def’s arrest outside

The officers had knowledge defendant had confederates in his drug operation. While he was arrested outside his house, a protective sweep inside was still shown to be reasonable. United States v. Pope, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209740 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 19, 2024).

Running an LPN is not an illegal search. Also, lack of insurance doesn’t have to be confirmed to be probable cause. White v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 572 (Nov. 20, 2024).*

The defense actually filed a motion to suppress: “In this case, Ptlm. Kassing observed a vehicle that did not have an operable license plate light while on routine patrol. He followed the vehicle to initiate a traffic stop. In response, the driver failed to stop after the emergency lights were activated, traveled in excess of the speed limit, threw evidence out of the window, failed to stop at three stop signs, and fled from the vehicle while it was still moving. Kassing had not only a reasonable and articulable suspicion that a traffic violation had been committed by an unknown person in the vehicle but also probable cause that multiple traffic violations had been committed by the driver. After Nabors’ flight from the Fusion, Ptlm. Kassing secured the black sock that was tossed out the window during the chase and other officers secured the abandoned vehicle.” Denied. United States v. Nabors, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210244 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 23, 2024).*

Posted in Abandonment, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Protective sweep of house was reasonable despite def’s arrest outside

NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

A trial judge in New Mexico noticed that there were an unusual number of suspect warrantless searches going unchallenged by the defense. She set suppression hearings and several cases were nolle prossed. A few survived to be heard. On certification from the court of appeals, the Supreme Court held that, without violating separation of powers, a trial court can sua sponte set a suppression hearing and make the parties litigate and the state defend the warrantless search, which is the state’s burden. Freedom from an unreasonable search is a fundamental right in this state, and the courts are to protect those rights. State v. Vasquez, 2024 N.M. LEXIS 245 (Nov. 18, 2024) (3-2) (A fascinating case worth one’s time to read.)

2255 petitioner seeks to litigate his search again but that’s barred by Stone. There’s no allegation that he was denied any opportunity to litigate or that evidence was hidden from him. Hahn v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209354 (D.N.M. Nov. 18, 2024).*

The anonymous complaint of a man in a specific car harassing a woman at a restaurant justified his stop when he was found. “If the defendant had simply requested the female’s phone number, it is unlikely that she would have made the complaint.” State v. Brumfield, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1893 ( La. App. 5 Cir Nov. 18, 2024).*

Posted in Informant hearsay, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Waiver | Comments Off on NM: Trial courts can raise search issues on their own

D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff’s jail telephone calls to the DA’s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).*

When an officer invokes the implied consent statute in a DUI case, the procedures must be followed or suppression occurs. State v. Flynn, 2024 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 91 (Nov. 15, 2024).*

“This Court finds, after looking at the totality of the circumstances, that Logwood’s consent to search the vehicle was voluntary. Therefore, Nugent had probable cause to search the vehicle based on Logwood’s consent as well as based on the detection of the odor of marijuana and Logwood’s admission that marijuana was inside.” United States v. Logwood, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207844 (W.D. La. Oct. 29, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206534 (W.D. La. Nov. 13, 2024).* [Court could have gone with probable cause and not even decided consent.]

An NYPD officer sued the homeowner for defective stairs he fell down during execution of a search warrant. He lost. Fahim v. De Leon, 2024 NY Slip Op 51558(U) (Richmond Co. Nov. 8, 2024).*

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

VA: Furtive movements during stop justified protective sweep of car

Furtive movements during a traffic stop added to reasonable suspicion of a potential weapon. Bazemore v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. App. LEXIS 659 (Nov. 12, 2024).*

“Under our highly deferential standard of review, it also created a sufficient—if weak—nexus between Deeble’s apartment and his alleged criminal activity.” [Followed by five paragraphs on nexus.] State v. Deeble, 2024-Ohio-5418 (6th Dist. Nov. 15, 2024).*

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is essentially a challenge to the proof at trial and rejected. The issues were thoroughly developed at trial and cross-examined on. State v. Gregory, 2024-Ohio-5420 (6th Dist. Nov. 15, 2024).*

Officers had probable cause to arrest for at least one offense, although not all they thought, and that defeats plaintiff’s false arrest claim. Bey v. Ayers, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29333 (7th Cir. Nov. 19, 2024).*

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on VA: Furtive movements during stop justified protective sweep of car

CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

The officer’s body slam of a resisting minor suspect about half his weight was entitled to qualified immunity. “But even if the facts of our case did fit Richmond, the statement that ‘less force is appropriate’ would not put every objectively reasonable officer on notice that a wrestling move to subdue a potentially armed, actively resisting plaintiff violated the Fourth Amendment.” H.M. v. Castoro, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 28991 (11th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024).*

The search warrants here were issued with sufficient particularity [without telling the rest of us why which is typical of the New York Appellate Divisions], considering they are “cloaked with the presumption of validity.” People v. Irwin, 2024 NY Slip Op 05684 (4th Dept. Nov. 15, 2024).*

Two searches: One allegedly invalid because without a warrant followed by another with a warrant. The first was based on entry on an emergency that led to a plain view, and that led to the warrant for the second search. People v. Howard, 2024 NY Slip Op 05733 (4th Dept. Nov. 15, 2024).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on CA11: Body slam of slighter built resisting arrestee was reasonable force

D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).*

Defendant’s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for warrant still shows probable cause. The complained about mistake wasn’t material to the probable cause and it wasn’t intentional. “Even if we found merit in Lenhart’s principal arguments, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule would apply.” United States v. Lenhart, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208550 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2024).*

There was reasonable suspicion on the totality to detain and handcuff defendant for stalking. United States v. Hoffpowier, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207974 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 23, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207043 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2024).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion and probable cause for defendant’s stop. He was looking for him and confirmed it was him from a booking photo he had. United States v. Virrueta, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29017 (8th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

Force Science: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing

Force Science via Police 1: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing by Lewis “Von” Kliem (“The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear Barnes v. Felix, a case that could redefine how officers’ split-second decisions are judged” [¶] “The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear Barnes v. Felix offers a long-awaited opportunity to clarify how officers’ pre-seizure actions are assessed in use-of-force cases. The case is pivotal, as it directly confronts the ‘officer-created jeopardy’ theory, which invites hindsight bias and outcome-driven judgments that challenge the Fourth Amendment’s objective reasonableness standard. [¶] Barnes v. Felix: A moment to reflect”).

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on Force Science: Officer-created jeopardy: A legal theory that threatens effective policing

D.Mont.: Off-roading during fire restriction was RS

Reasonable suspicion and a park violation: “Accordingly, Sergeant Call’s 11 years of experience in Park County coupled with his knowledge of state and county law gave him reason to suspect that Mitchell was potentially engaged in criminal conduct—namely, trespassing and operating a vehicle off road during stage two fire restrictions.” United States v. Mitchell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208132 (D. Mont. Nov. 15, 2024).*

The district court’s finding the officer did not lean in the car before seeing the gun is supported by the record and affirmed. United States v. McDonald, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29222 (3d Cir. Nov. 18, 2024).*

Police entered plaintiff’s home in response to a burglary call. A gun was seized for “safekeeping.” He sued over the entry and lost. His appellate argument about a jury instruction not properly defining the scope of permissible search is rejected as undeveloped. Burks v. Tate, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29161 (7th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024).*

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Off-roading during fire restriction was RS

W.D.Tenn.: Def succeeds in a Franks challenge

Something we don’t see hardly ever: The omitted information was material to probable cause and the affiant omitted it thinking it didn’t matter. But it did. And the good faith exception doesn’t apply here. United States v. Pettigrew, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207943 (W.D. Tenn. Nov. 15, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Def succeeds in a Franks challenge