D.Me.: State mandated GPS tracking of lobster boats reasonable under closely regulated business exception

Under the closely regulated business exception, the State of Maine can require lobsterman to have GPS tracking on their boats. (It’s an important question and the plaintiffs are urged to appeal to the First Circuit.) Thompson v. Keliher, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211714 (D. Me. Nov. 21, 2024).

Defense counsel at trial likely was ineffective in not discovering there was a search warrant for defendant’s phone, but, on this record, it wouldn’t change the result. There’s plenty of evidence to support the conviction besides that. Buford v. State, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 519 (Nov. 21, 2024).*

“It is undisputed that the initial seizure of the Vehicle was lawful, so a Fourth Amendment seizure claim based on the Vehicle’s unlawful retention cannot stand. See Shaul, 363 F.3d at 187. Accordingly, summary judgment is granted to Defendants on Santander’s Fourth Amendment claim. But Santander is not without recourse, for the Fourteenth Amendment affords it a ‘right with respect to a government agency’s retention of lawfully seized property.’ Shaul, 363 F.3d at 187; see also Bennett, 832 F. App’x at 60.” Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. City of Yonkers, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211330 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.