Cal.1: Entry by robot, drone, tear gas, and flash bang was with PC after def refused to come on an SW and AW

To arrest the defendant on a warrant and with a search warrant, the SWAT team surrounded his house. They used a robot, drone, tear gas, and a flash bang sent into the apartment. He finally came out and surrendered. Despite alleged false statements in the paperwork, the arrest was reasonable. “We will affirm the judgment because we agree with the Attorney General that the trial court incorrectly traversed the arrest warrant because the warrant affidavit still set forth sufficient facts to establish probable cause even after the false statements were excised. Therefore the police lawfully could arrest defendant in his home or by forcing him from it, as they did.” People v. Hayes, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 368 (1st Dist. June 12, 2026).

Defendant’s vehicle was lawfully stopped, and it was extended by reasonable suspicion. When the dog alerted, the car was towed for a later search. The dog alert was probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Christian, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131095 (W.D. Pa. June 12, 2026).*

Defendant was approached by police and they talked. He wasn’t seized until he was tripped trying to get away. United States v. Wilson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131275 (D.N.J. June 12, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Seizure, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.