HI: TSA check of powdery substance in luggage seen on x-ray was reasonable

TSA’s x-raying baggage at the Honolulu airport produced an unknown substance in a Ziploc bag that TSA could check to be sure it wasn’t explosives for an IED or other harmful thing. Here, it produced drugs, and the search was valid. State v. Kaulukukui, 2024 Haw. App. LEXIS 534 (Nov. 27, 2024) (unpublished):

Continue reading
Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on HI: TSA check of powdery substance in luggage seen on x-ray was reasonable

MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Defendant was well-known to be a meth abuser, and when he was stopped for a traffic offense and had a Leatherman tool on him, that could be considered usable as a weapon. People v. Babcock, 2024 Mich. App. LEXIS 9506 (Nov. 27, 2024) (unpublished).*

This 2254 search claim would fail on the merits of the search. Renya v. Dir., Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Just.-Corr. Insts. Div., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215322 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2024).*

Defendant wasn’t seized when she mentioned there likely was a warrant for her arrest. State v. Rymal, 2024 MT 277 (Nov. 26, 2024).*

Defendant was asleep at the wheel of a running car in a casino parking lot. He was finally awakened by knocking on the window, and he was asked to produce that it was his car, and that led to reasonable suspicion of drugs. State v. McClellan, 2024 MT 276 (Nov. 26, 2024).*

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Leatherman tool on belt could be considered weapon for frisk

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).*

Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. He was in an area known for car break-ins but he didn’t do anything. State v. Dyson, 2024-Ohio-5591 (2d Dist. Nov. 26, 2024).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone. Green v. State, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 9207 (Fla. 1st DCA Nov. 27, 2024).*

A broken taillight lens justified defendant’s stop because white light was coming out. State v. Mendez, 2024 Kan. LEXIS 107 (Nov. 27, 2024).*

2255 petitioner claimed late developed information would have supported a Franks challenge before trial. Notwithstanding all that, there still was probable cause. United States v. Robinson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216040 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 27, 2024).*

Plaintiff was strip searched under a warrant, and his claim of mental anguish fails. Vizcarrondo v. City of Yonkers, 2024 NY Slip Op 51619(U) (Westchester Co. Nov. 27, 2024).*

“Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested pursuant to a facially invalid warrant, … and that he was unlawfully detained for twenty-two days. … He contends that this arrest violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and his Fourteenth Amendment rights. … Plaintiff seeks ‘an award of punitive damages against Defendants for their violations of [his] rights pursuant to the United States Constitution.’” This is a new Bivens context and rejected. Taylor v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216218 (D.S.C. Oct. 4, 2024).

Defendant was an Amazon driver suspected of mail robberies. In his vehicle was a postal key, mail with others’ names, and a cell phone plugged in that had his picture on the screen. USPIS showed probable cause for the warrant for the phone. The fact there was a CI who was reluctant to ID himself was of less significance because it was nearly all corroborated. United States v. Smith-Ellis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216228 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 27, 2024).* [At least the police revealed the CI was reluctant.]

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

2254 petitioner can’t show prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress cocaine when he was acquitted of that charge. Zayas-Acosta v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30236 (11th Cir. Nov. 27, 2024).

Challenge to the search of defendant’s cell phone that produced text messages used at trial was foreclosed by Stone. He had the chance to litigate it in state court. Carter v. Morgan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215218 (S.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213888 (S.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2024).*

Despite F.R.C.P. 8 and notice pleading, not so with the Fourth Amendment: “The action as a whole is subject to dismissal because Plaintiff fails to allege facts sufficient to state a claim for relief that is plausible. Although Plaintiff cites certain constitutional amendments and appears to be trying to assert claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, and/or malicious prosecution. However, to the extent Plaintiff intends to asserts those claims, they are each without merit because Plaintiff has not alleged sufficient facts to support such claims.” Arthur v. South Carolina, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215234 (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 2024).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

Defendant moved to suppress something he threw away in flight from the police, and the trial court granted it. On appeal, he confesses error that it was abandoned. Reversed. State v. Howard, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 9246 (Fla. 6th DCA Nov. 27, 2024).* [I would love to see the discussion on remand, maybe something like:”So you filed this motion to suppress; convinced me to grant it; and then backed up on it on appeal? Why should I believe you the next time you file a motion to suppress?”]

Defendant’s gun was found in his flight path attempting to avoid being stopped. There was thus no reasonable expectation of privacy. On “four corners review” of the search warrant, there was plenty of probable cause. United States v. Berry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215238 (D. Minn. Oct. 17, 2024).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress the cell phone data search, and it didn’t matter anyway. Other evidence put defendant at the scene of the crime. Bradley v. Taskila, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215271 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 26, 2024).*

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy? by Tatum Hunter (“Clear saves you time at the airport. Just make sure to read the fine print.” “Airport security is, by nature, at odds with individual privacy. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been criticized for unfairly picking out Middle Eastern travelers and trans people, and now it’s in the spotlight again for expanding its controversial facial-scanning program. Clear, which says it has more than 20 million members, works like the TSA’s PreCheck program by letting subscribers move through security quicker. But the service comes with some concerns for consumers. [¶] Clear collects biometrics and health details such as your vaccine status to perform its services. It also forces customers to sign an agreement that prohibits them from suing the company in court or joining a class-action lawsuit.”)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/11/27/clear-tsa-precheck-cost-privacy-airport-security/

Posted in Airport searches, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: What’s better for price and privacy?

Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue

Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue (ABAJ Nov. 26, 2024) (“The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to decide whether police must compensate a Texas homeowner for damages to property incurred while officers tried to oust a kidnapping suspect from a home that he entered while on the run. [¶] The cert petition ‘raises a serious question,’ said Justice Sonia Sotomayor in a statement respecting the cert denial. The issue is ‘whether the takings clause permits the government to destroy private property without paying just compensation, as long as the government had no choice but to do so.’ [¶] Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Sotomayor’s statement.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Debra Cassens Weiss, Are police responsible for damaging home to oust suspect? Sotomayor and Gorsuch see important issue

D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

In a § 242 prosecution for violating civil rights, the defense proposed expert is barred from opinion on whether probable cause existed for the arrest. “Whether a given set of facts constitutes probable cause to arrest or charge for a crime is within a jury’s ordinary knowledge and experience, as reflected in the constitutional requirement of indictment by grand jury. … Regardless of whether it goes to an element or an ultimate issue, the existence of probable cause is a legal conclusion that must be left to the jury. … I therefore grant the Government’s motion to prohibit Rodriguez from testifying as to whether Boruchowitz had probable cause to arrest Evans.” United States v. Boruchowitz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215666 (D. Nev. Nov. 27, 2024).

The prior pending action doctrine justified dismissal of the seizure claim in this case. The parties were a little different but the causes of action were the same. State ex rel. Dunn v. Burton, 45710, 2024 Conn. App. LEXIS 315 (Nov. 26, 2024).*

Defendant’s stop was admittedly pretextual, but there at least was an objective basis for it. The ultimate dog alert gave probable cause. United States v. High, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215214 (N.D. Ga. Oct. 29, 2024).*

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

Gant search incident permits a search for a driver’s real driver’s license in a car when he fails to properly identify himself. United States v. Pinder, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29995 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).

Complaining generally about a “search” and “curtilage” and expounding with nothing except a couple of cases not remotely on point wasn’t an adequate argument. Nielsen v. Island Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 2278 (Nov. 25, 2024) (unpublished).*

The drug dog allegedly instinctively put his nose into defendant’s car. Whether that was a search didn’t matter because it was with probable cause based on informant hearsay. United States v. Newberry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215043 (N.D. Iowa Nov. 26, 2024).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging the search here because it couldn’t win. Pitts v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215125 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 26, 2024).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: Gant permits search for DL in car when def fails to identify himself

D.Or.: Taking iPhone 6 apart and putting new firmware to make it work wasn’t a “search” for information

Taking an iPhone 6 apart, putting it back together, and installing new firmware to make it work was not a “search” because that process was not to obtain information. [Well, that was the ultimate goal, wasn’t it?] United States v. Rohani, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215029 (D. Or. Nov. 26, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on D.Or.: Taking iPhone 6 apart and putting new firmware to make it work wasn’t a “search” for information

CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

Defendant chose to go pro se at the suppression hearing, grudgingly accepting standby counsel. After the motion to suppress was denied, he claimed ineffective assistance by standby counsel for not doing more. But that’s not standby counsel’s role. United States v. Lemicy, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30000, 2024 WL 4888913 (8th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).

Defendant’s argument that the warrantless search of his girlfriend’s apartment finding him fails because he was on supervised release, and they were looking for him. The same with the search of his cell phone: it was valid because he was on supervised release. United States v. Robinson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30002 (2d Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).*

Because of factual disputes whether plaintiff was armed when the defendant officer shot him, qualified immunity isn’t appealable. Fact questions remain. Clerkley v. Holcomb, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29997 (10th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).*

Not search cases but: After a fire, defendant’s cell phone records were obtained with a warrant and they put the lie to defendant’s version of how she awoke to a fire in her house. State v. Neal, 2024 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 525 (Nov. 26, 2024).* After a fight in the front yard, police learn of a Ring camera and get a warrant for it convicting defendant. Marshall v. Commonwealth, 2024 Va. App. LEXIS 685 (Nov. 26, 2024).*

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

WY: Courthouse entry search valid under “special needs”

Defendant entered a courthouse, and the metal detector went off on a small can on him which he opened on request revealing meth. These searches are valid as “special needs.” Russell v. State, 2024 WY 126, 2024 Wyo. LEXIS 128 (Nov. 26, 2024).

“Fairweather alleges that he was stopped by Spathelf in April of 2023 for traffic violations, and that Spathelf subsequently searched his vehicle without consent or a warrant and without probable cause. Fairweather claims that the search yielded nothing illegal. Accordingly, construing the complaint liberally as we must, we conclude that Fairweather has sufficiently stated a Fourth Amendment claim against Spathelf arising out of the April 2023 search.” Fairweather v. Spathelf, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214184 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 25, 2024).*

Defendant passenger was lawfully ordered from the car during a stop and he wasn’t in custody when he admitted to crossing the border illegally and didn’t need yet to be Mirandized. United States v. Martinez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214431 (D.N.M. Nov. 25, 2024).*

Posted in Custody, Special needs | Comments Off on WY: Courthouse entry search valid under “special needs”

OH12: Stop for riding bicycle in center of road led to RS for frisk

Defendant’s stop was for riding a bicycle in the center of the road, but when finally stopped, he had a large sheathed knife on him, and that justified a frisk. State v. Hayes, 2024-Ohio-5545 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024).*

“Defendant complains about whether one of his lawyers liked him and whether another was too young to handle the case. He also provides a self-serving history about the circumstances of his arrest and the investigation. None of these arguments entitle him to relief.” Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress that was obviously going nowhere. United States v. Milke, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214069 (E.D. Ark. Nov. 25, 2024).*

The search warrant materials were late being disclosed but long enough before trial that the defense can’t show prejudice. People v. Irving, 2024 NY Slip Op 51602(U), 2024 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 22419 (Kings Co. Nov. 12, 2024).*

Defendant prevails in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel failed to move to suppress a protective sweep done without justification. Remanded for a full suppression hearing. State v. Jones, 2024-Ohio-5501 (1st Dist. Nov. 22, 2024).*

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH12: Stop for riding bicycle in center of road led to RS for frisk

TX1: GPS installed by dealer in a used car was owned by dealer and was not comparable to CSLI

Defendant bought a used car that the dealer had GPS installed in if necessary to recover it. The police accessed that information without a warrant to connect him to a murder. The contract for the vehicle told defendant about the GPS and that it was the property of the dealership until the car was paid off. It thus was third party information. Moreover, it was not as detailed and intrusive as CSLI in Carpenter. People leave their cars, but cell phones go everywhere. Wharton v. State, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 8188 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Nov. 26, 2024):

Continue reading
Posted in Cell site location information, GPS / Tracking Data, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on TX1: GPS installed by dealer in a used car was owned by dealer and was not comparable to CSLI

D.Mass.: Gun suppressed in FIPF case still not excludable in violation of supervised release

Defendant was an alleged felon in possession and was charged with a new federal crime and a violation of his supervised release. He was sentenced to 22 months on the violation. The gun was suppressed in the new gun case which is still pending. That suppression doesn’t benefit him in a 2255 on the supervised release violation. United States v. Vick, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214461 (D. Mass. Nov. 25, 2024).

“Bogan claims that he did not have an adequate opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim in the state trial court because (1) the state circuit judge’s factual findings were somehow inadequate, (2) the prosecutor did not marshal sufficient proof to justify stopping the vehicle, and (3) ‘fraud on the court.’ … [¶] The Sixth Circuit has observed that the ‘opportunity for full and fair consideration means an available avenue for the prisoner to present his claim to the state courts, not an inquiry into the adequacy of the procedure actually used to resolve that particular claim.’ Good v. Berghuis, 729 F.3d 636, 639 (6th Cir. 2013) (quotation marks omitted). [¶] There are several reasons for this rule. …” His claim is barred by Stone v. Powell. Bogan v. Christiansen, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 214235 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 22, 2024).*

The conditional language of the request for consent shows it was not coercive. United States v. Marr, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212729 (D. Neb. Nov. 22, 2024).*

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Gun suppressed in FIPF case still not excludable in violation of supervised release

OH12: No reason why a federal search warrant can’t result in a state prosecution

A federal search warrant produced the drugs in question, and they were not inadmissible for that reason in a state prosecution. State v. Hana, 2024-Ohio-5548, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4234 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024).

The trial court found that the search of defendant’s car was justified as a protective sweep. It also was valid under the automobile exception because there was probable cause. State v. Brown, 2024-Ohio-5546 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024).*

In an animal rescue case, removing the challenged statements from the probable cause showing still left probable cause. Barraclough v. Animal friends, Inc., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29768 (3d Cir. Nov. 22, 2024).*

Whether NCMEC is a private actor or not (per CA10), this child pornography search was still valid. United States v. Jeffery, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29787 (4th Cir. Nov. 22, 2024).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH12: No reason why a federal search warrant can’t result in a state prosecution

CA6: Defense counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Carpenter three years early

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not forecasting Carpenter years before it was decided. Cooper v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29853 (6th Cir. Nov. 22, 2024).*

Defendant was on parole for a child exploitation offense, and he was polygraphed and that led to a warrantless search of his phone that produced child pornography. Then a search warrant was obtained, too. The searches were valid. State v. Goforth, 2024 Kan. App. LEXIS 33 (Nov. 22, 2024).*

The court finds the search warrant was signed before it was executed. United States v. Dew, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213391 (W.D. La. Oct. 29, 2024).*

There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop based on not having headlights on in rainy conditions. United States v. High, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213651 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 25, 2024).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: Defense counsel not ineffective for not forecasting Carpenter three years early

CA2: No less intrusive measures requirement before seeking CSLI

“The CSLI and cell-site simulator warrants provided evidence of the general and specific location of one of Brown’s cell phones and, therefore, of Brown’s likely movements between his indictment and arrest. Brown contends that investigators procured these warrants by falsely representing that they required the CSLI and cell-site simulator information to locate and arrest him. The Government vigorously denies falsity. We need not resolve this dispute or ask the District Court to do so. First, to procure a search warrant, the Government need show only probable cause to believe that the search will yield incriminating evidence-or, in this case, facilitate an authorized arrest. It need not show that it has exhausted other investigative means without success.” United States v. Brown, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29898 (2d Cir. Nov. 25, 2024).

The CI provided detailed information about defendant’s possession of PCP down to keeping it in a thermos because it needed to be stored in a glass container. “Given the CI’s lengthy and proven track record of providing truthful and corroborated information, under the totality of the circumstances, law enforcement had probable cause to search the Defendant’s vehicle. Indeed, ‘there [was] a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime [would] be found in’ the vehicle. Gates, 462 U.S. at 214.” United States v. Streater, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211910 (D. Conn. Nov. 21, 2024).*

The false statements in the affidavit for warrant were neither reckless nor intentional nor even material. United States v. Clanton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 212304 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2024).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: No less intrusive measures requirement before seeking CSLI

Salon: “It is a weapon”: Ronan Farrow discusses the spyware in our pockets in “Surveilled”

Salon: “It is a weapon”: Ronan Farrow discusses the spyware in our pockets in “Surveilled” by Gary M. Kramer (“You never know [spyware] was there. It copies everything on your phone and it leaves” … “The cogent documentary, ‘Surveilled,’ now available on HBO, tracks journalist Ronan Farrow as he investigates the proliferation and implementation of spyware, specifically, Pegasus, which was created by the Israeli company NSO Group. The company sells its product to clients who use it to fight crime and terrorism. It is claimed that Pegasus was instrumental in helping capture Mexican drug lord, Joaquín ‘El Chapo’ Guzman. However, there are also reports that NSO’s products are being used to target journalists, human rights activists and political dissidents.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Salon: “It is a weapon”: Ronan Farrow discusses the spyware in our pockets in “Surveilled”

techdirt: Two Missouri Cops Are Facing Criminal Charges For Helping Themselves To Nude Photos Found On Drivers’ Phones

techdirt: Two Missouri Cops Are Facing Criminal Charges For Helping Themselves To Nude Photos Found On Drivers’ Phones by Tim Cushing, updating this post from 11/15

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on techdirt: Two Missouri Cops Are Facing Criminal Charges For Helping Themselves To Nude Photos Found On Drivers’ Phones