Category Archives: Protective sweep

CA6: Asking def before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda

Asking defendant before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda. United States v. Lester, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 9162 (6th Cir. Apr. 16, 2024). The evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion defendant consented to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Privileges, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA6: Asking def before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda

NY Queens: PC shown for SW blood drawn at hospital after car wreck

Probable cause was shown for the search warrant for defendant’s blood drawn at a hospital after a car wreck. To the extent there is also a Franks challenge, it fails. People v. Moreno, 2024 NY Slip Op 24116, 2024 NYLJ … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Nexus, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on NY Queens: PC shown for SW blood drawn at hospital after car wreck

D.P.R.: Indictment for possession of switches to convert handguns to machine guns justified vehicle search when defendant was stopped

Defendant was indicted for possession of conversion devices to make handguns machine guns. That justified search of his car when he was stopped. United States v. Berríos-Aquino, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66657 (D.P.R. Apr. 4, 2024). The DEA subpoena for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Protective sweep, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Indictment for possession of switches to convert handguns to machine guns justified vehicle search when defendant was stopped

CA9: No IAC for not filing a motion to suppress email attachments captured by email provider under ToS

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress because it was reasonable to conclude defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in email attachments with the email provider where the terms of service also said there was … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA9: No IAC for not filing a motion to suppress email attachments captured by email provider under ToS

CA5: PC showing for house in affidavit for SW also supported automobile exception search of car elsewhere

The affidavit for the warrant for defendant’s house also provided nexus to defendant’s car. When it was driven away from the house just before the search, the police decided to stop and search it. That search was valid under the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA5: PC showing for house in affidavit for SW also supported automobile exception search of car elsewhere

E.D.Pa.: Nexus can be shown by inference

There was probable cause as to defendant’s house, with nexus a strong inference: “Here, the officers, applying their training and experience to the facts before them, reasonably inferred that Mitchell was a drug dealer and was carrying drugs and other … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Nexus can be shown by inference

E.D.N.Y.: Def gets Franks but govt also gets to show justification for protective sweep

There were mistakes in the affidavit that at least gets defendant a Franks hearing. The government, however, will get to provide more information about the justification for a protective sweep which is not confined to the four corners. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def gets Franks but govt also gets to show justification for protective sweep

E.D.Cal.: Motion for return of property can’t be granted while criminal proceedings still pending

A motion for return of property involved in a criminal case can’t be entertained until all proceedings have concluded. Here, the 2255 has neither been filed nor resolved. United States v. Kindley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31431 (E.D. Cal. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Motion for return of property can’t be granted while criminal proceedings still pending

OH2: Allegation that search occurred before SW issued is not a Franks issue

“A second problem is that the foregoing scenario does not raise a Franks issue. If Detective Saunders did prematurely enter the house without a warrant, he may have violated the Fourth Amendment. But that act would not establish any falseness … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH2: Allegation that search occurred before SW issued is not a Franks issue

CA2: Where PC and GFE found by District Court, both have to be argued on appeal or waiver occurs

The district court found probable cause and the good faith exception applied. On appeal, he argued only probable cause. The alternative ground of good faith was thus waived and the court can affirm. United States v. McGregor, 2024 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: Where PC and GFE found by District Court, both have to be argued on appeal or waiver occurs

CA4: Another search, surveillance cameras, likely presence of weapons and other persons justified protective sweep

Another search the day before, surveillance cameras, and the likely presence of weapons and others justified this protective sweep. “The officers knew, for example, they were about to arrest a substantial drug supplier, and he had a known connection to … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Another search, surveillance cameras, likely presence of weapons and other persons justified protective sweep

NY Nassau: Mere theory someone else is inside when it’s not even practical doesn’t support a protective sweep

Police were sent to defendant’s house/dentist office on a report of his menacing with a firearm. Defendant came out and submitted. The entry into the house for exigency or protective sweep was not shown by the state to be justified. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NY Nassau: Mere theory someone else is inside when it’s not even practical doesn’t support a protective sweep

D.P.R.: No REP of corporate officers in medical records in health care fraud case

Records were taken by a corporate whistleblower on a flash drive from a Puerto Rican health care provider. That led to a 122-count indictment for health care fraud. A motion to suppress was filed over the records. Defendants were corporate … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: No REP of corporate officers in medical records in health care fraud case

S.D.N.Y.: Controlled buy at def’s door + sound from inside = protective sweep

Officers did a controlled buy [used to be called “buy-bust”] of drugs and then used the alleged noise from inside to justify a protective sweep. The protective sweep was valid. Defendant was in the doorway and Santana (1976) justified the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Controlled buy at def’s door + sound from inside = protective sweep

NC: Where def drove on grass approaching 4A violating checkpoint, there was RS

Because defendant’s stop at a checkpoint was already with reasonable suspicion, the court does not have to decide on the constitutionality of the roadblock [that appears to have caused it]. State v. Alvarez, 2023 N.C. LEXIS 940 (Dec. 15, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Protective sweep, Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: Where def drove on grass approaching 4A violating checkpoint, there was RS

LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

“In our view, the trial court did not err in finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless procurement of Defendant’s cell-site information. Defendant was attempting to flee from the investigation of this violent crime, [and there was a serious risk … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

Defendant’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein was not a critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited. State v. Heng, 2023 Wash. LEXIS 603 (Dec. 7, 2023). “The government contends that [the search] was justified both … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

The officers’ protective sweep of a property with a working meth lab was objectively reasonable. United States v. Moreno, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201424 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 9, 2023). Defendant’s cell phone was used during the period the rape victim … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Protective sweep of meth lab property was objectively reasonable

WV: State did not justify “officer safety” as reason for entry

The state failed to justify the entry here on officer safety grounds because their neighbor disturbance call included no reference to potential violence or threats and no good reason could be articulated other than “officer safety” which essentially is always … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, State constitution | Comments Off on WV: State did not justify “officer safety” as reason for entry

S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

It was permissible for officers to seize firearms seen in plain view during this protective sweep. United States v. Riley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198798 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2023). “Given the totality of the circumstances and the numerous distinctions … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep