D.Alaska: No REP in cell of 48 hr detainee

A 48 hour pretrial detainee in a dry cell has no reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Burk, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209407 (D. Alaska Nov. 18, 2024).*

Defendant’s Franks officer of proof with a proffered corrected affidavit for warrant still shows probable cause. The complained about mistake wasn’t material to the probable cause and it wasn’t intentional. “Even if we found merit in Lenhart’s principal arguments, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule would apply.” United States v. Lenhart, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208550 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2024).*

There was reasonable suspicion on the totality to detain and handcuff defendant for stalking. United States v. Hoffpowier, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207974 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 23, 2024),* adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207043 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 14, 2024).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion and probable cause for defendant’s stop. He was looking for him and confirmed it was him from a booking photo he had. United States v. Virrueta, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29017 (8th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.