TX5: State has to prove SW application properly sworn to; no GFE where it wasn’t pled

Where it couldn’t be established that the officer swore to a notary or clerk when applying for a search warrant for blood, the motion to suppress was properly granted. The state doesn’t get the benefit of the good faith exception because didn’t argue it below. State v. Shelton, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4502 (Tex. App. – Dallas June 26, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Burden of pleading, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on TX5: State has to prove SW application properly sworn to; no GFE where it wasn’t pled

ID: Flicking a cigarette butt to the ground in a bar parking lot was not RS

Flicking a cigarette butt to the ground in a bar parking lot was not reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. Popp, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 69 (June 27, 2025).

Idaho declines to impose higher standards for dog sniffs under state constitution. State v. Fletcher, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 68 (June 27, 2025).*

On the whole, defendant consented to a search of the car, and being made to wait away from it wasn’t inconsistent. There’s also this: “Here, the Court concludes that Hill walking toward the door, complying when told to sit down, and sitting silently for several minutes while the search continued was not clearly inconsistent with his consent to search and did not constitute an unequivocal withdrawal of consent. This appears to be consistent with Hill’s interpretations of his actions as well: After officers discovered the scale in his trunk, he remarked, ‘If I thought I had anything, I wouldn’t have even gave consent, I would have made you go and get a search warrant.’ … Hill validly consented to the search and did not withdraw his consent, so the search of his Impala was lawful.” United States v. Hill, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122244 (W.D. Ark. June 27, 2025).*

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on ID: Flicking a cigarette butt to the ground in a bar parking lot was not RS

NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

Officers got a search warrant for defendant’s premises and searched. Two days later, they discovered through a source that they missed a cache of drugs in the house. They came back with another. The results of the first search were admissible at trial to help show possession. People v. Phillips, 2025 NY Slip Op 03893, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3942 (4th Dept. June 27, 2025).*

“[W]e discern no error in the district court’s determination that the officer who stopped Bethea had a reasonable basis for conducting such an investigative stop. Considering the totality of the circumstances-including Bethea’s obvious impairment, his paranoid behavior in the minutes leading up to the stop, the position of the firearm in his hands, and the arresting officer’s knowledge of the area and previous experience responding to calls there-the officer had reasonable, articulable suspicion that Bethea was involved in illegal activity justifying the stop.” United States v. Bethea, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15818 (4th Cir. June 26, 2025).*

Idaho’s standing cases for the driver of a rental vehicle not on the contract were essentially overruled by Byrd. Remanded. State v. Gonzales, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 70 (June 27, 2025).*

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

D.D.C.: Search of international letter in D.C. was valid as border search

Search of an international letter on arrival in D.C. was valid as a border search. United States v. Martin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123023 (D.D.C. June 27, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion for the officer’s encounter with defendant who was suspected of being an armed security guard without a license to carry. Defendant wasn’t restrained or disarmed, just asked a few questions. State v. Weaver, 2025-Ohio-2256 (2d Dist. June 27, 2025).*

In a traffic stop, the smell of marijuana was obvious as the officer walked up to the car without the windows even having been rolled down. That justified the vehicle search. Enriquez v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4474 (Tex. App. – Eastland June 26, 2025).*

Defendant’s drug sale journal was squarely within the scope of the warrant that included documents and journals. United States v. Keller, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15958 (9th Cir. June 27, 2025).*

Posted in Border search, Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Search of international letter in D.C. was valid as border search

CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

Opening a refrigerator wasn’t justified by any exigent circumstances in an entry to interview children about alleged abuse. McMurry v. Weaver, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15956 (5th Cir. June 27, 2025).

The dueling experts’ reports show a triable issue of excessive force. Grant of summary judgment reversed. A.B. v. Cty. of San Diego, 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 399 (4th Dist. June 26, 2025).*

Plaintiff’s complaint the government used falsified information to get a search warrant was untimely filed. Faller v. DOJ, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15796 (6th Cir. June 25, 2025).*

2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not filing a motion to suppress that would never be granted fails. United States v. Goodin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122962 (W.D. La. June 27, 2025).*

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Opening refrigerator here wasn’t justified by exigency during “sweep”

Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep by C.J. Ciaramella (“The Trump administration deployed National Guard soldiers to assist the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and other federal law enforcement agencies during a large-scale marijuana raid last week in a stunning example of drug war mission creep. The Los Angeles Times reported that about 315 National Guard troops assisted the DEA during a June 18 raid on suspected illegal marijuana farms in Thermal, an unincorporated desert community on the southeast edge of Riverside County. The Defense Visual Information Distribution Service posted photographs showing soldiers carrying riot shields next to Humvees. The raid, completely divorced by geography and purpose from the Trump administration’s original justifications for deploying troops to Los Angeles, is a compelling argument for why the president’s sweeping emergency powers should be restricted.”).

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Using the National Guard in DEA Raids Is the Worst Kind of Drug War Mission Creep

CA5: Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. v. Paxton revd

Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. v. Paxton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219598 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2024), posted here, rev’d 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15838 (5th Cir. June 26, 2025).

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA5: Spirit Aerosystems, Inc. v. Paxton revd

WA: Admin. search entry through employee entrance tailgating employee into building violated statute and was suppressed

“This appeal asks us to decide whether Department of Labor and Industries (DLI) inspectors possessed authority to tailgate a fitness club member through an otherwise locked door into the fitness club to ask for permission to inspect the business premises for employees working during the COVID-19 pandemic when the business should have been closed. In answering this question, we interpret RCW 49.17.070, which authorizes inspectors to enter commercial premises at ‘a reasonably recognizable entry point.’ We also apply Fourth Amendment principles. We conclude that tailgating behind an entrant who opened an outside door with her keycard constituted an unreasonable point of entry and violated the fitness club owner’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Thus, we affirm the superior court’s dismissal of a citation against Bradshaw Development, Inc. for violating Proclamation by Governor Jay Inslee, No. 20-25.4 (Wash. May 31, 2020), … and WAC 296-800-14035.” Bradshaw Dev., Inc. v. Wash. State DOL, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 1261 (June 26, 2025).

After defendant pled guilty and was sentenced, he filed a 2255 claiming ineffective assistance of counsel for not moving to suppress. Defense counsel told him one would fail, without explanation. The plea waived the search claim. “Third, the government responds that, while defendant now faults counsel for failing to seek to suppress evidence seized from the searches, he fails to identify any ‘unlawful’ search or seizure or that a motion to suppress would have been successful. The United States is correct on all counts.” Blackburn v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121657 (E.D. Tenn. June 26, 2025).*

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WA: Admin. search entry through employee entrance tailgating employee into building violated statute and was suppressed

D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

Defendant was stopped on a bicycle with backpack and bedroll with another in New Hampshire by a CBP officer who suspected they’d illegally crossed the border. They admitted they had. Suspecting they were involved with human smugglers, the officers searched defendant’s computer looking on WhatsApp for information about smuggling, instead finding child pornography. This led to a further warrant. The search was valid as an extended border search. Every circuit and every other district in the First Circuit recognizes it. United States v. Garcia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121221 (D.N.H. June 26, 2025).

“In sum, the Court holds that the brief interaction between when Detective Brandefine seized Mr. Rhodes and when Detective Brandefine discovered Mr. Rhodes’s gun was a Terry stop, not an arrest. While perhaps more intrusive than the average Terry stop, Detective Brandefine’s actions were a reasonable response to encountering an individual suspected of being armed, particularly given that the individual—Mr. Rhodes—was in a relatively small space with several innocent bystanders nearby.” “In this case, Detective Vargas suspected that Mr. Rhodes was armed based on numerous factors, including his observation of Mr. Rhodes’s movements, his knowledge of Mr. Rhodes’s prior arrests, and his understanding that the intersection where he observed Mr. Rhodes was a high-crime area where the NYPD had investigated multiple shootings and recovered multiple guns. This suspicion was reasonable based on the detective’s training and experience as a police officer.” United States v. Rhodes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121818 (S.D.N.Y. June 26, 2025).*

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Extended border search of men on bicycles was valid

PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

The protective sweep was valid, but it did not permit going into dresser drawers. Commonwealth v. Hightower, 2025 PA Super 129, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (June 25, 2025); Commonwealth v. Layer, 2025 PA Super 128, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 276 (June 25, 2025)* (codefendant).

Even if this state search warrant violated Rule 41, that alone is not enough to suppress. There’s no constitutional violation. United States v. Cook, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119021 (D. Kan. June 23, 2025).*

During a vehicle inventory, the officer found a gun and stopped to get a search warrant. If anything, the officer did more than the law required. (The inventory policy did not even contemplate this.) United States v. Holmes, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15451 (11th Cir. June 23, 2025).*

Involving a warrant for storage units, there was plenty of probable cause shown to the magistrate. There was mistake of fact in it that was only negligent at best and not even material in light of all the other evidence. United States v. Lampkin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118259 (E.D. Mo. May 30, 2025),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117559 (E.D. Mo. June 18, 2025).*

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

The parole search of defendant’s place was still valid even though he was arrested outside. State v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-2216 (9th Dist. June 25, 2025).

2255 petitioner doesn’t show counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress because a suppression motion wouldn’t be granted. Wilson v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119486 (W.D. Ky. June 20, 2025).*

The underlying factual dispute on the use of force means qualified immunity isn’t appealable. Calliste v. Lor, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15546 (4th Cir. June 24, 2025).*

The delay in getting to search defendant’s cell phone for child pornography was not unreasonable just because it was delayed. United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15624 (8th Cir. June 25, 2025).*

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

“[T]he trial court was entitled to find that the questioning and free-air dog sniff were done concurrently with other tasks related to the mission of the traffic stop and therefore did not impermissibly prolong the stop.” Avant v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 278 (June 25, 2025).

Defendant parolee was already violating terms of parole for drugs when the PO got information from a lady friend. “Although the caller did not provide her name, this tip had indicia of reliability given that the tipster identified herself as Dennis’s girlfriend and knew his birthday and the name of his parole officer.” That was reasonable suspicion for a parole search. United States v. Dennis, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658 (2d Cir. June 25, 2025).*

2254 petitioner fails in his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging admissibility of a search warrant seeking defendant’s DNA. It was found below to be a strategic decision to not call further attention to it. Messenger v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119539 (S.D. Ohio June 24, 2025).*

If the drug dog’s nose touching the vehicle was a trespass, the dog had effectively alerted by then and there was probable cause. State v. Fitzpatrick, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 29 (June 25, 2025).*

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

Plaintiff was at the wrong place at the wrong time of a threatened robbery. He was taken from his car at gunpoint and an officer held him down with a knee to the neck nearly asphyxiating him. While no case is exactly in point, the court finds it clearly established anyway. He had no weapon, he posed no threat justifying that kind of force. Shepard v. Sheriff of Wakulla Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15689 (11th Cir. June 25, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

“Maybe thirteen officers were not needed. Maybe the officers did not need to carry and display rifles. Maybe fewer vehicles could have been used to block Defendant’s vehicle. Maybe officers did not have to place Defendant in handcuffs because their weapons were pointed at him and were not holstered until his vehicle was cleared. The Court declines to indulge in unrealistic second-guessing here.” United States v. Chavez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120656 (W.D. Tex. June 24, 2025).*

Officers putting in an affidavit that other charges were pending against the target was accurate as far as they knew, although it turned out that those charges had been dismissed. No Franks violation. United States v. Gamon, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120092 (M.D. Pa. June 25, 2025).*

“Given the Court is under no obligation to review objections that are merely reiterations of arguments already presented to and reviewed by the Magistrate Judge, defendant’s objection here is OVERRULED.” United States v. Partin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120701 (E.D. Tenn. June 25, 2025).*

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

The state requiring the taking of some blood from newborn infants for testing and keeping it did not constitute a seizure because plaintiffs proved no property interest. Parental consent is required for any later use. Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep’t of Health & Hum. Servs., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15685 (6th Cir. June 25, 2025), prior appeal 927 F.3d 396 (6th Cir. 2019), reversing 684 F. Supp. 3d 637 (E.D. Mich. 2023).

All things considered, defendant’s post prison release GPS requirement was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Streed, 2025 Mass. App. LEXIS 54 (June 26, 2025).*

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. Nothing is shown to be misleading nor material. United States v. McGuire, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120946 (D. Haw. June 25, 2025).*

The motion to suppress is untimely and on the eve of trial. Denied. United States v. Glenn, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120690 (E.D. Tenn. June 25, 2025).*

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

The apartment building’s parking lot was not part of the curtilage. United States v. Isaac, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120584 (D. Kan. June 24, 2025).

Defendant was wanted on a PV warrant. A warrant task force located a place he might be and staked it out. They saw him go in, and they came to the door and found him. The protective sweep thereafter was reasonable. That led to a valid warrant. State v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-2216 (9th Dist. June 25, 2025).*

The stop was reasonable because of a traffic offense, but officers also previously developed reasonable suspicion to believe the vehicle was involved in drug trafficking. United States v. Reiman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119700 (D. Neb. May 5, 2025).*

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress that would never have succeeded. Wilson v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119486 (W.D. Ky. June 24, 2025).*

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws

National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws by John R. Puri (but it just sounds like what Google collects for GPS traffic):

Continue reading
Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means by Shira Ovide:

Continue reading
Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Digital privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only going to issue a citation, until he found a firearm, that is. United States v. Clarke, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117813 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2025).

The officers did not use excessive force here, and the district court just didn’t believe plaintiff’s expert. “Cunningham’s expert may believe he did not resist or pose a threat to the Defendant Officers, but the body-camera footage shows otherwise. As discussed above, the videos show that Cunningham ran from the officers, would not surrender his hands after clear and continuous requests to do so, and kept his left arm underneath his body where a weapon could have been stored.” Cunningham v. Cobb Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15434 (11th Cir. June 23, 2025).*

Defendant was suspected of having a gun. After finding a diaper on his person, the police concluded that’s where the gun was, and they were right. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the diaper, and, even if there was, there was exigency. People v. Polanco, 2025 NY Slip Op 50996(U), 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5630 (Bronx Co. Apr. 28, 2025).*

Summarized here in one paragraph (all that’s needed) the affidavit for warrant showed a substantial basis for finding probable cause. United States v. Taslakian, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118417 (D. Mass. June 23, 2025).*

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

Using BitTorrent to access defendant’s open child pornography files peer-to-peer on his computer was not a digital trespass and did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ewing, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15437 (11th Cir. June 23, 2025). (DoJ press release here)

How defendant’s cell phone records and CSLI were obtained in 2012 complied with the law at the time, so the good faith exception applies. Wilson v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 144 (June 24, 2025).*

While investigating the traffic stop the officer called for backup with a drug dog. The stop was not unreasonably extended to perform the dog sniff, and there was [barely] reasonable suspicion that some crime was going to occur. McGhee v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4331 (Tex. App. – Dallas June 23, 2025).*

The inventory of defendant’s car was reasonable because he was a drunk driver and the car had to be towed, not just because he was on a gang watch list. United States v. Jim, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118818 (E.D. Cal. June 22, 2025).*

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Inventory, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search