Category Archives: Admissibility of evidence

OH6: Exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones

The exclusionary rule only applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones.State of Ohio/City of Or. v. Hendricks, 2026-Ohio-1796 (6th Dist. May 15, 2026).* Under Stone, “The only relevant question for this federal habeas Court is whether Butler was given a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH6: Exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not statutory ones

FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

Defendant was raided by the federal government for alleged cockfighting, and he claimed that “80-100” officers showed up “with bullet proof cars and ‘one of those war tanks.’” The product of the raid was given over to the state and … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

S.D.Cal.: Refusal to submit to warrant to show face to open cell phone was admissible at trial

Defendant’s refusal to comply with a search warrant for biometric opening of his cell phone (here, a face scan) was admissible at trial to show consciousness of guilt. “Given that ‘[i]t is today universally conceded that the fact of an … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Refusal to submit to warrant to show face to open cell phone was admissible at trial

D.Idaho: Trial references to SW not barred, but govt limited in what it can say

Defendant’s motion to preclude the government from referring to being in his house on a search warrant is granted in part and denied in part under F.R.E. 403. The government cannot suggest that issuance of a warrant means any judicial … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Trial references to SW not barred, but govt limited in what it can say

E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

Here, the application for the search warrant was considered on the detention question. No motion to suppress yet filed (or would one be?). United States v. Evans, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31755 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 17, 2026). Defendant’s valid stop … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Application for SW was considered in detention ruling

D.P.R.: Def can lack standing in the place yet still be in possession to be convicted

“Furthermore, there is nothing impermissible with the Government arguing that a defendant does not have an expectation of privacy in a place to assert a Fourth Amendment violation, while arguing that the defendant possessed the evidence seized in that same … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def can lack standing in the place yet still be in possession to be convicted

CA8: Password note near domestic partner’s computer was RS def on probation used that computer, too

Passwords near a computer seen in a probation search around defendant’s domestic partner’s computer was reasonable suspicion defendant could have too. United States v. Berry, 24-2337 (8th Cir. April 3, 2026).* Mandamus doesn’t lie to remedy petitioner’s constitutional claims. He … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA8: Password note near domestic partner’s computer was RS def on probation used that computer, too

RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel not moving to suppress DNA off a blanket found on a road when he’d stipulated to it being his DNA. [There’s also an obvious abandonment issue not even mentioned.] Tassone v. State, 2026 R.I. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Nexus | Comments Off on RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

Affidavit for search warrant was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial. It was full of hearsay and the burden for probable cause is too low for reasonable doubt. Also, admitting a video violated the confrontation clause. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

Defendant’s simple [nonaggressive] refusal to comply with a search warrant for his DNA for 12 days was admissible at trial. [There’s also a prior discussion that suggests harmless error.] Lee v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 32 (Jan. 13, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Privileges, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Refusal to comply with DNA warrant for 12 days was relevant evidence under 403

D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026). Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

Defense counsel didn’t object to the search warrant and application coming into evidence in the state’s case because it fit within the defense theory, despite being full of hearsay, assuming defendant would testify, as he said he would. Then he … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

TX2: Basis for SW wasn’t inadmissible “hearsay”

What shows the basis for seeking a search warrant is not inadmissible “hearsay.” Williams v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 8224 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Oct. 23, 2025). “But the government has grounds to search a known drug dealer’s … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on TX2: Basis for SW wasn’t inadmissible “hearsay”

CA2: One has to preserve the 4A claim for a conditional plea

Defendant didn’t properly preserve his Fourth Amendment claim for appeal from a conditional plea. United States v. Smurphat, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26002 (2d Cir. Oct. 7, 2025). “A search warrant limited to a single dwelling apartment is sufficiently particular … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA2: One has to preserve the 4A claim for a conditional plea

CA2: Warrantless search of ptf’s Uber app history was a 4A violation

Warrantless search of a cell phone to access plaintiff’s Uber history stated a Fourth Amendment claim. Etere v. Nassau Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 25753 (2d Cir. Oct. 3, 2025). Even if defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA2: Warrantless search of ptf’s Uber app history was a 4A violation

OH1: Controlled buy that led to SW admissible as 404(b)

The state succeeded in admitting as 404(b) evidence the controlled buy that led to the search warrant to “tell[ ] the story of these crimes.” It was presented on appeal as plain error, but it was held not to be … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on OH1: Controlled buy that led to SW admissible as 404(b)

GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

Not strictly a Fourth Amendment case, but interesting: Defendant’s place in a child molestation case was searched and adult porn was seized. The porn was admitted over objection as 404(b) evidence, and it was prejudicial and completely inadmissible because it … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

The video of execution of the search warrant was sufficiently authenticated to be admissible at trial despite coming in through a witness other than the one who took it. United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316 (1st Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Private search, Probable cause, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

Officers got a search warrant for defendant’s premises and searched. Two days later, they discovered through a source that they missed a cache of drugs in the house. They came back with another. The results of the first search were … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial