NY4: First search missed cache of drugs, so police came back for a second search; first search admissible at trial

Officers got a search warrant for defendant’s premises and searched. Two days later, they discovered through a source that they missed a cache of drugs in the house. They came back with another. The results of the first search were admissible at trial to help show possession. People v. Phillips, 2025 NY Slip Op 03893, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3942 (4th Dept. June 27, 2025).*

“[W]e discern no error in the district court’s determination that the officer who stopped Bethea had a reasonable basis for conducting such an investigative stop. Considering the totality of the circumstances-including Bethea’s obvious impairment, his paranoid behavior in the minutes leading up to the stop, the position of the firearm in his hands, and the arresting officer’s knowledge of the area and previous experience responding to calls there-the officer had reasonable, articulable suspicion that Bethea was involved in illegal activity justifying the stop.” United States v. Bethea, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15818 (4th Cir. June 26, 2025).*

Idaho’s standing cases for the driver of a rental vehicle not on the contract were essentially overruled by Byrd. Remanded. State v. Gonzales, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 70 (June 27, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.