Monthly Archives: April 2023

NV: A-C privilege reason for return of documents

Attorney-client privilege is reason for return of documents under F.R.Crim.P. 41(g), and Nevada recognizes that, too, regardless of whether there is an open investigation. In re Search Warrants Regarding Seizure of Documents, 2023 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 131 (Apr. 7, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Hot pursuit, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NV: A-C privilege reason for return of documents

D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

Even if the search warrant was executed here before 6 a.m., defendant doesn’t show any prejudice by that. A cell phone is not exigency in itself, but here there was at least some risk of destruction of evidence because defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Nighttime search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

E.D.Mo.: Despite initial deception from officers, cell phone search was by consent

“Even when Sgt. Sublette’s initial deception is considered, the totality of the circumstances amount to voluntary consent by Carron. At the time of the encounter, Carron was a 44-year-old man who appeared to be reasonably intelligent with prior experience in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Despite initial deception from officers, cell phone search was by consent

NYT: A.I. Is Coming for Lawyers, Again

NYT: A.I. Is Coming for Lawyers, Again by Steve Lohr (“Previous advances in A.I. inspired predictions that the law was the lucrative profession most likely to suffer job losses. It didn’t happen. Is this time different?”):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYT: A.I. Is Coming for Lawyers, Again

DE: Uncorroborated CI doesn’t provide PC

The CI was not sufficiently corroborated, and it thus fails to show probable cause. State v. Mason, 2023 Del. Super. LEXIS 172 (Apr. 6, 2023)*:

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on DE: Uncorroborated CI doesn’t provide PC

NY Nassau: Questions in ER about drug and alcohol use not “pedigree questions”

Questions at the hospital about drug or alcohol use are not “pedigree questions” because they go to the heart of the investigation. People v. Jeffcoat, 2023 NY Slip Op 50306(U), 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1549 (Nassau Co. Apr. 7, 2023).* … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on NY Nassau: Questions in ER about drug and alcohol use not “pedigree questions”

E.D.Va.: Seizing def as he was opening his door was an invasion of the curtilage without exigency

After an attempted traffic stop, following defendant to his front door and stopping him after the screen door was opened in between it and the front door was curtilage, even in an apartment building. There was no exigency justifying the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Seizing def as he was opening his door was an invasion of the curtilage without exigency

CA11: Mere fact of a firearm in the home wasn’t exigency here

“Although Officer Plesnik now arrived with the knowledge that there was a firearm on site, the mere presence of a firearm—without more—did not transform the non-exigent scene into an exigent circumstance and trigger the emergency aid exception. Indeed, by the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA11: Mere fact of a firearm in the home wasn’t exigency here

E.D.Tenn.: Mislabeling SW attachments not worthy of exclusion

Accidental reverse numbering of Attachments A and B didn’t make the search warrant void. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60866 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 6, 2023).* Plaintiff’s claim that the Director of National Intelligence violates the Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Mislabeling SW attachments not worthy of exclusion

MS: Thief has no standing in a stolen car

Defendant had no standing in a stolen vehicle. In addition, because it was stolen, impoundment and an inventory search would occur in any event, and that would have been legal anyway. Sills v. State, 2023 Miss. LEXIS 89 (Apr. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on MS: Thief has no standing in a stolen car

NPR: Feds barged into the wrong hotel room during a drill, then detained the guest inside

NPR: Feds barged into the wrong hotel room during a drill, then detained the guest inside (“Federal agents and military personnel conducting a training exercise at a Boston hotel interrogated an unsuspecting civilian after they entered the wrong room by … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NPR: Feds barged into the wrong hotel room during a drill, then detained the guest inside

VA: Smell of MJ from one person in car is PC to that person only

When the smell of marijuana is localized to one person, that’s the extent of the probable cause. If from the car, it’s the car. King v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 213 (Apr. 4, 2023) (unpublished). The video showed that … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on VA: Smell of MJ from one person in car is PC to that person only

CAAF: Cost of exclusion outweigh benefits, so no exclusion

In a sex assault case, assuming the search of defendant’s cell phone was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule should not be applied. M.R.E. 311. The error, if there was one, was the commanding … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CAAF: Cost of exclusion outweigh benefits, so no exclusion

SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

As to the blood draw in this DUI death case, “We conclude section 56-5-2946 is facially constitutional but unconstitutional as applied in Appellant’s case. However, we find the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress because … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

Following another county court, this one also holds that Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights are both fundamental and an order removing firearms must be based on finding of mental impairment and due process. R.M. v. C.M., 2023 NY Slip … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

TX6: Def’s multiple lies during traffic stop was RS

All of defendant’s lies during a traffic stop added up to reasonable suspicion. “During the investigation of the initial traffic stop and Dixon’s lack of a driver’s license, Dixon lied about coming from Angie B’s, a nightclub known for high … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX6: Def’s multiple lies during traffic stop was RS

WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

“Here, Giberson was a guest in Goedker’s motel room. As a result, Goedker as the person renting the room had authority to give consent for law enforcement to search the room. … And even though Giberson was present, because he … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

Mental health seizures under Florida’s Baker Act comply with the Fourth Amendment when it’s objectively reasonable to believe that the person is a danger to himself or others. Here the officers had that from defendant’s threats to shoot people. United … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

The warrant here was particular enough. It didn’t just seek stolen property; it sought particular property stolen from the victim and clothing worn during the burglary caught on video. Williamson v. State, 2023 Miss. App. LEXIS 125 (Apr. 4, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

Denial of petitioner’s Rule 41(g) motion for return of property was not appealable when the property is tied up in the criminal process. It is not an exclusionary rule, and it remains available even if the government doesn’t plan on … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process