Category Archives: Warrant papers

OR: Accidentally omitted warrant from email results in suppressing search despite finding of PC and particularity

The officer emailed to the magistrate the affidavit for warrant and he thought the warrant, too. The magistrate emailed back saying she found probable cause and authorized the search. A day or two later, the officer realized the warrant was … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OR: Accidentally omitted warrant from email results in suppressing search despite finding of PC and particularity

CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

Defendant’s pants were transported from the hospital to the jail, and inevitable discovery covers their search. United States v. Gibbins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2026). The warrant for five cell phones was executed within the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

Petitioner obtained his search warrant application years after he was convicted. His habeas is denied. He claims it shows he was actually innocent, but this is only potential legal innocence, not actual innocence, and there’s a difference. Davis v. Warden, … Continue reading

Posted in Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

E.D.Cal.: A cell phone number in SW papers isn’t reason to seal them

The government doesn’t provide justification for sealing this search warrant application merely because there are cell phone number in it. It is presumptively a public record. In re Matter of Application by United States for Search Warrant to Search, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Discovery, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: A cell phone number in SW papers isn’t reason to seal them

NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

Search under a general administrative tax warrant under state law violates the Fourth Amendment. This involved a search of a house where the taxes were not paid on illegal drugs. Also, it was issued by the Secretary of Revenue and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

E.D.Cal.: No sealing SW materials without a showing of justification from government

The government’s motion to seal search warrant materials from a year ago because the investigation is ongoing is denied for lack of a showing of justification. In re Matter of Application by United States for Search Warrant to Search, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: No sealing SW materials without a showing of justification from government

N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can’t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it’s ratifying the officer’s conclusions, mentioning being a “rubber stamp.” In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

C.D.Cal.: Handcuffing an inmate is not a 4A violation

“Plaintiff’s only purported basis for a Fourth Amendment claim is a vague assertion that ‘handcuff/restraints = false report.’ (Compl. at 6). Liberally construed, this appears to suggest that Plaintiff allegedly was seized without sufficient cause. In the prison context, however, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Handcuffing an inmate is not a 4A violation

D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

In overcoming a warrant particularity challenge cured by the affidavit, the government satisfied its burden that the affidavits in support of the warrant were emailed to the issuing judge as two pdf files in the same email. They weren’t, of … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Affidavit emailed with SW to judge was considered “attached”

DE: No IAC claim where challenged evidence never used at trial

There is no ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim where the product of the search was not used at trial. State v. Finney, 2025 Del. Super. LEXIS 404 (Aug. 18, 2025). Crime victims are … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Mootness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: No IAC claim where challenged evidence never used at trial

W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

Filing a search warrant and application before it is served isn’t a constitutional requirement. [And even if it was, where’s the prejudice?] United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130063 (W.D. Wis. July 8, 2025):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

A person accused has a statutory right of access to search warrant affidavits in his own case. “The applicable provisions state only that the documents ‘shall be made available’ to defendants ‘when requested,’ without specifying to whom the request should … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

TX4: State can’t rely on community caretaking function where it didn’t make a record below

The state couldn’t rely on the community caretaking function exception on appeal where it didn’t develop the record for it below. State v. Young, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4196 (Tex. App. – San Antonio June 18, 2025). Defendant can’t make … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Community caretaking function, Probable cause, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX4: State can’t rely on community caretaking function where it didn’t make a record below

TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to this warrant. He signed it but didn’t acknowledge swearing to it. “the Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically explained that ‘to convey the solemnity and critical … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

CA8: In a consent search of a car, picking up cell phone and seeing lit screen wasn’t an unreasonable search

“Did Trooper Rorie’s 20 seconds of questioning and request for consent prolong the stop beyond the time needed to complete the remaining tasks of the traffic stop? We hold that it did not. The brief duration of the inquiry within … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonableness, Search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA8: In a consent search of a car, picking up cell phone and seeing lit screen wasn’t an unreasonable search

OH5: Obvious typo in SW paperwork can be overlooked

Obvious typographical error in search warrant papers can be overlooked. State v. Crisp, 2025-Ohio-1718, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1690 (5th Dist. May 13, 2025). Walking away from a police encounter is permitted, but here the officers had reasonable suspicion based … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH5: Obvious typo in SW paperwork can be overlooked

FL5: Traffic stops can be based on RS, not PC

Traffic stops can be based on reasonable suspicion, not just probable cause. State v. Howard, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 3618 (Fla. 5th DCA May 9, 2025). A light bar on a three wheel off road vehicle was reasonable suspicion for … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL5: Traffic stops can be based on RS, not PC

AF: Military search authorization orally supplemented was subject to GFE

There were multiple military search authorizations, and the request here was orally supplemented before issuance expanding the particularity. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Johnson, 2025 CCA LEXIS 193 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. May 2, 2025). A … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Seizure, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AF: Military search authorization orally supplemented was subject to GFE

CA4: SW affidavit not required to name an offender

A search warrant is about whether evidence would be found in the place to be searched, not whether there’s an offender. United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10138 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2025). 2255 petitioner’s Franks ineffective assistance … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Curtilage, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: SW affidavit not required to name an offender