NV: A-C privilege reason for return of documents

Attorney-client privilege is reason for return of documents under F.R.Crim.P. 41(g), and Nevada recognizes that, too, regardless of whether there is an open investigation. In re Search Warrants Regarding Seizure of Documents, 2023 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 131 (Apr. 7, 2023).*

The search of defendant’s car was justified under the automobile exception for the smell of marijuana and as a parole search. United States v. Ford, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62655 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 10, 2023).*

A visible firearm as the officer walked up to the car was reasonable suspicion in Illinois. United States v. Morris, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62659 (S.D. Ill. Apr. 10, 2023).*

Hot pursuit into defendant’s house to arrest him failed when there was no justification for the arrest or entry. State v. Moses, 2023 La. App. LEXIS 566 (La. App. 4 Cir Apr. 10, 2023).

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Hot pursuit, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.