Category Archives: Nighttime search

E.D.N.Y.: The search of def’s house started about 6:10 am; the camera time hadn’t been adjusted for DST

Defendant submitted that the search of his house started at 5:00 am. The officers and virtually all the evidence showed it started at 6:10 am. The metadata on some photographs showed 5:16 am. The court finds the camera’s time hadn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The search of def’s house started about 6:10 am; the camera time hadn’t been adjusted for DST

CA2: District court erred in suppressing a SW executed at 6 am where SW and Rule 41 say 6 am to 10 pm

This search warrant was executed at 6 am, and the district court erred in granting the motion to suppress. “While 6:00 a.m. is the earliest time provided, it cannot be said that executing a warrant in accordance with its text–which … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: District court erred in suppressing a SW executed at 6 am where SW and Rule 41 say 6 am to 10 pm

W.D.Mo.: SW found to have been served after 6 am, but even if not, no prejudice

The court’s credibility determination is that the warrant here was executed after 6:00 a.m., not before. Even if they arrived early, they didn’t enter until 6:00 a.m. “Assuming, arguendo, the officers searched Defendant’s home before 6:00 a.m., the facts demonstrate … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: SW found to have been served after 6 am, but even if not, no prejudice

D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

Even if the search warrant was executed here before 6 a.m., defendant doesn’t show any prejudice by that. A cell phone is not exigency in itself, but here there was at least some risk of destruction of evidence because defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Nighttime search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

DE: People inside isn’t exigency for nighttime SW

The justification for a nighttime search warrant was insufficient as a matter of law. The mere presence of people in the house is not exigency. State v. Harrison, 2022 Del. Super. LEXIS 302 (July 14, 2022). The USMJ found defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Cell site simulators, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Nighttime search | Comments Off on DE: People inside isn’t exigency for nighttime SW

ID: The necessity of a nighttime search authorization can be inferred from the showing of PC as a whole

The request for a nighttime search can be inferred from the affidavit for the search warrant as a whole. “Reading the affidavit as a whole, it is reasonable to infer that the interests of justice were best served by the … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search | Comments Off on ID: The necessity of a nighttime search authorization can be inferred from the showing of PC as a whole

MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

A court can take judicial notice that execution of a search warrant at 11 pm is not during daylight hours in Mississippi. Doe v. Doe, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 473 (Nov. 9, 2021) (only recognizing rule; this is not a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nighttime search, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

D.Minn.: This nighttime search was reasonable and not overly intrusive

Nighttime searches can be overly intrusive, but, on balance, this one was not unreasonable. United States v. Jerome, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148848 (D.Minn. Aug. 9, 2021):

Posted in Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Minn.: This nighttime search was reasonable and not overly intrusive

N.D.Ohio: Alleged ambiguity in whether nighttime search authorized resolved by all the circumstances in favor of it

It wasn’t obvious that the search warrant did not permit a nighttime search, and it was presented to the state judge at night involving a shooting that night. The circumstances were apparent that the search was to happen then. Moreover, … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Alleged ambiguity in whether nighttime search authorized resolved by all the circumstances in favor of it

N.D.Cal.: Potential for risk of violence justified nighttime search

Defendant’s motion to suppress on several grounds is denied. The affidavit showed probable cause, and the good faith exception would apply anyway. The affidavit for a firearm wasn’t stale; the information about weapons was still “fresh” even though a shooting … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Potential for risk of violence justified nighttime search

OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

The court sustains a nighttime search warrant based solely on the fact that there were some sales of drugs from the house without specifying the time, and that it was “urgent” that the raid happen now for drugs, potential weapons, … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

OH6: SW with nighttime search authorization can be executed in daytime, too

A search warrant with a nighttime search authorization can be executed in the daytime, too. State v. Flores, 2018-Ohio-3980, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 4307 (6th Dist. Oct. 1, 2018) [Daytime warrant execution is just safer. That’s why there’s a high … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH6: SW with nighttime search authorization can be executed in daytime, too

CA5: 2 am knock-and-talk that led to alleged consent and excessive force claim gets no QI

2 a.m. knock and talk may have been unreasonable, and summary judgment for officers is reversed. Plaintiff closed her door and they insisted upon entry. The officers were investigating whether plaintiff’s son committed trespass that night. Plaintiff also stated a … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Nighttime search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: 2 am knock-and-talk that led to alleged consent and excessive force claim gets no QI

D.Nev.: Good cause shown for execution of SW at night because of neighborhood children

The government showed good cause for execution of a search warrant at night because of defendant’s house’s proximity to a school on break that would likely have kids around in the day in case the raid became violent. In any … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Good cause shown for execution of SW at night because of neighborhood children

D.Nev.: Nighttime search clause in SW moot where search was during day

Police showed probable cause for a DNA search warrant in an effort to connect defendant to an armed robbery. The warrant had a nighttime search clause. Since this all happened during daylight hours, any issues with the nighttime clause are … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Nighttime search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Nighttime search clause in SW moot where search was during day

E.D.N.C.: Post-release supervision home search before dawn wasn’t reasonable

Defendant was subject to home post-release supervision visits conducted at reasonable times. This one was 6:00-6:15 am when sunrise was nearly 7 am. This was effectively a nighttime search of his house and was thus unreasonable. Suppressed. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Post-release supervision home search before dawn wasn’t reasonable

CA9: 4 am knock-and-talk violated implied license of Jardines

Officers came to defendant’s house at 4 am for a knock-and-talk to arrest him. They heard a crashing noise in the backyard and found defendant there. The subsequent search of defendant’s house was presumptively unreasonable and without any lawful justification. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Nighttime search | Comments Off on CA9: 4 am knock-and-talk violated implied license of Jardines

NY3: Nighttime search was justified, and defendant wasn’t even home

Police justified a nighttime search warrant at defendant’s house. He was a suspect in a robbery with a knife to the victim’s throat where the victim was forced into an apartment. In the ensuing struggle, the victim said the suspect … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Nighttime search | Comments Off on NY3: Nighttime search was justified, and defendant wasn’t even home

MI sustains a 4 am knock-and-talk; a depressing must read for practitioners there

This 4 a.m. knock-and-talk was reasonable. Seven police officers with vests and guns showed up to get a consent and got it. Defendant was dealing marijuana butter in a MMJ state. People v. Frederick, 2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 2289 (Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Nighttime search | Comments Off on MI sustains a 4 am knock-and-talk; a depressing must read for practitioners there

OH5: Being on porch waiting for keys before 8 pm was not a nighttime search

The daytime search provision is 7 am to 8 pm. Officers were on defendant’s porch before 8 pm and were waiting for keys rather than force entry. They complied with the rule. State v. Harris, 2015-Ohio-2480, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Being on porch waiting for keys before 8 pm was not a nighttime search