Author Archives: Hall

CA5 (en banc): Arrest of “citizen journalist” under a statute never declared unconstitutional was with QI

“Villarreal fails to satisfy her burden on either [qualified immunity] prong. This is not a case about a ‘citizen journalist just asking questions.’ That clever but misleading phrase cannot relieve this court of our obligation to evaluate Villarreal’s conduct against … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5 (en banc): Arrest of “citizen journalist” under a statute never declared unconstitutional was with QI

CA2: Reason to believe ptf was inside justified entry with arrest warrant under Payton

Officers had an arrest warrant for plaintiff, and that gave them the ability to enter his home to look for him under Payton when they had a reasonable belief he was inside. United States v. Johnson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Reason to believe ptf was inside justified entry with arrest warrant under Payton

CNN: Amazon’s Ring to shutter video-sharing program popular with police

CNN: Amazon’s Ring to shutter video-sharing program popular with police by Brian Fung [“shutter” isn’t quite correct, is it?:] (“ Amazon’s Ring will no longer let police and other government agencies request doorbell camera footage from within the company’s Neighbors … Continue reading

Posted in Video surveillance | Comments Off on CNN: Amazon’s Ring to shutter video-sharing program popular with police

CA5: This circuit’s “moment of threat” doctrine for excessive force should be re-examined as contrary to Garner

The “moment of threat” doctrine of excessive force cases in this circuit seems contrary to Tennessee v. Garner, and it should be revisited by the whole court. Barnes v. Felix, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1530 (5th Cir. Jan. 23, 2024):

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: This circuit’s “moment of threat” doctrine for excessive force should be re-examined as contrary to Garner

WI: Drug dog “instinct exception” not applicable here, even if it is ever adopted

The court declines to adopt, at least for now, a drug dog’s “instinct exception” for the dog entering defendant’s car. Other courts have adopted that exception, but factually it doesn’t even apply here because the court finds the dog was … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WI: Drug dog “instinct exception” not applicable here, even if it is ever adopted

E.D.N.C.: This iCloud SW not overbroad

The warrant for defendant’s iCloud account was not overbroad. Defendant essentially admitted that the information sought would be found there. United States v. Duncan, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11090 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2024).* Defendant was in a rental vehicle, but … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Computer and cloud searches, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: This iCloud SW not overbroad

N.D.Ga.: Use of cell phone cash app to facilitate PPP fraud justified SW for phone

Use of a cell phone cash app to facilitate spending PPP loan fraud justified warrant for phone. United States v. Foster, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11369 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 22, 2024). Codefendant’s case: United States v. Baptiste, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Use of cell phone cash app to facilitate PPP fraud justified SW for phone

WA: Merely holding on to DL doesn’t make stop a detention; “context matters”

“Officer Ayers’s language would have assured a reasonable person that the officer was not making a show of authority: the officer assured Mr. Taylor he was not a suspect, but wanted to ‘get [his] name just so we have that … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Standing, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Merely holding on to DL doesn’t make stop a detention; “context matters”

CA4: Another search, surveillance cameras, likely presence of weapons and other persons justified protective sweep

Another search the day before, surveillance cameras, and the likely presence of weapons and others justified this protective sweep. “The officers knew, for example, they were about to arrest a substantial drug supplier, and he had a known connection to … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Another search, surveillance cameras, likely presence of weapons and other persons justified protective sweep

CA9: Wholesale inventory searches of private safe deposit boxes in SW for business was unreasonable

US Private Vaults case reversed. The search of USPV’s 700 safe deposit boxes for inventory was unreasonable. The FBI obtained a warrant for USPV’s business because of its business practices, and this search of the safe deposit boxes of customers … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA9: Wholesale inventory searches of private safe deposit boxes in SW for business was unreasonable

VA: Automobile exception doesn’t require “ready mobility” and this car was totaled in a wreck

Defendant’s car was totaled in a wreck, and it couldn’t be driven. Nevertheless, the automobile exception applied to it. After Carney, “ready mobility” is no longer required because of the lesser expectation of privacy in a car compared to a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drones, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Automobile exception doesn’t require “ready mobility” and this car was totaled in a wreck

Cal.: Partial overbreadth can lead to suppression in egregious cases with flagrant constitutional violations, but this isn’t one

While partial overbreadth can lead to suppression of everything seized in an egregious case with flagrant misconduct, this isn’t one: “And as in Bradford and Kraft, we conclude that the facts here do not warrant this extreme remedy.” “According to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Overbreadth, Standing | Comments Off on Cal.: Partial overbreadth can lead to suppression in egregious cases with flagrant constitutional violations, but this isn’t one

W.D.Ark.: Manhandling a diabetic who passed out while driving gets no QI; law well established

Plaintiff, a diabetic, had a car wreck while in a low blood sugar episode. From the court’s opinion, it’s clear the officers had no idea what they were doing when they handcuffed and Tased her for no apparent reason, then … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Manhandling a diabetic who passed out while driving gets no QI; law well established

DE: The PC for cell phone was limited to search history; SW otherwise overbroad

Defendant was accused of sexual contact with a four-year-old girl he was caring for. Her mother kicked him out of the house and sought a forensic exam of the child. A couple of days later, she found his cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: The PC for cell phone was limited to search history; SW otherwise overbroad

Cal.5: Defective notice of Facebook warrant under CalECPA doesn’t require suppression

Defendant’s Facebook account was accessed by a search warrant issued under CalECPA. The notice provision was not complied with by the state, but the court declines to suppress here. The standard for suppression in CalECPA is the same as for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Social media warrants, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.5: Defective notice of Facebook warrant under CalECPA doesn’t require suppression

E.D.Ark.: State parole search waiver applies to hotel room used for drug dealing

The parole search waiver under state law provides for searching one’s domicile. Here there was probable cause to believe defendant was using a hotel room for drug dealing, and he was there for more than a de minimus time. Thus, … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: State parole search waiver applies to hotel room used for drug dealing

W.D.Ky.: Boilerplate in affidavit doesn’t matter if the critical facts show PC

Boilerplate information in the affidavit for warrant doesn’t matter as long as the critical facts show probable cause, and here they did. There were five facts supporting probable cause. United States v. Morton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7580 (W.D. Ky. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Boilerplate in affidavit doesn’t matter if the critical facts show PC

N.D.Tex.: Suppression in forfeiture is Supp.Rule G(8)(a) not Rule 41

The government sought forfeiture of the owner’s cash after it was seized at DFW after a dog sniff on his bag. The owner responded with a motion to suppress under Rule 41, but that doesn’t apply in forfeiture cases. Supplemental … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Suppression in forfeiture is Supp.Rule G(8)(a) not Rule 41

SD: Failure to put SW materials in record means trial court presumed correct

There were two search warrants for location data and defendant’s cell phone. Without the search warrant materials in the appellate record, there’s nothing to review and the trial court is assumed to be correct. State v. Horse, 2024 S.D. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Warrant papers | Comments Off on SD: Failure to put SW materials in record means trial court presumed correct

MS: No REP against CI recording you in your own house during drug deal

911 was called about a man passed out in his pickup truck in his driveway at the street.There was no reasonable expectation of privacy against letting in a wired CI under Hoffa. Douglas v. State, 2024 Miss. LEXIS 24 (Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MS: No REP against CI recording you in your own house during drug deal