DE: The PC for cell phone was limited to search history; SW otherwise overbroad

Defendant was accused of sexual contact with a four-year-old girl he was caring for. Her mother kicked him out of the house and sought a forensic exam of the child. A couple of days later, she found his cell phone he left behind and looked at the internet search history which was incriminating. The phone was turned over to the police who got a warrant for it. The warrant was overbroad because the only information they had was the search history and a complete search of the phone was sought with no time limitation. Terreros v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 20 (Jan. 18, 2024).

U.S. Representative Scott Perry was the target of a search warrant. The press seeks access to the material supporting it. The court orders redaction of parts of the ongoing investigation to not compromise it. In re Penn Live, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10663 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 19, 2024).*

Defendant’s 2255 raised admission of jailhouse writings admitted at trial without objection via 404(b). They were mentioned on appeal, but the argument wasn’t raised then. It’s defaulted. Heuser-Whitaker v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10278 (E.D. Va. Jan. 19, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.