Category Archives: Overbreadth

LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone included “or within cloud based storage accessible by the device.” The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026). Defense counsel’s failure … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

A “clumsy” inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not an unreasonable inventory. No level of specificity is required. United States v. Samuels, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96304 (S.D. Fla. May 1, 2026). The CSAM search warrant here for ten … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

GA: Virtually all-inclusive list of items to be seized wasn’t overbroad

The warrant was all inclusive of drug information including use of the proceeds, and it didn’t violate particularity. Ball v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 222 (Apr. 30, 2026):*

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Virtually all-inclusive list of items to be seized wasn’t overbroad

E.D.Va.: Search incident could be done on FTA arrest

Defendant was arrested on a state Capias for FTA issued in open court. The search incident to the arrest was valid. United States v. Barnhart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91284 (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 2026). Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. There … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Overbreadth, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Search incident could be done on FTA arrest

CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

This CSAM cell phone warrant was broad, but that’s a recognition that files could have false names to hide them. It was not unreasonable. United States v. Daniels, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11323 (3d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026):

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Cell phone warrant for CSAM could be broad because of possible hiding and misidentifying files

C.D.Cal.: Overbroad and indefinite subpoenas can have 4A implications

The Supreme Court has recognized that overbroad or indefinite subpoenas can have Fourth Amendment implications. United States v. Baass, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73143, at *16 n.9 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2026) (§ 49.04 n.6):

Posted in Overbreadth, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Overbroad and indefinite subpoenas can have 4A implications

S.D.Cal.: Notebook of passwords was within the scope of a CSAM warrant

During a child pornography warranted search, officers found a notebook of passwords, and it was within the scope of the warrant. United States v. Lira-Prado, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 982 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). One child pornography warrant led … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Overbreadth, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Notebook of passwords was within the scope of a CSAM warrant

E.D.Mich.: Defense can’t use SCA to get emails, even if they’re exculpatory

Only a governmental entity gets to use the Stored Communications Act to get emails. The defense can’t do it seeking even alleged exculpatory emails. Perry v. Silverthon, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 828 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 5, 2026). “Single-incident liability ‘is … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth, Particularity, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Defense can’t use SCA to get emails, even if they’re exculpatory

D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

When the government retained electronic evidence obtained from a lawyer under a warrant, concluded the investigation, and then, years later, searched the information again in a different investigation, the remedy here was order of immediate return to the lawyer and … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Electronic evidence seized in one investigation of Comey cannot be searched years later for evidence in another; return ordered under Rule 41(g)

M.D.Fla.: Unauthorized practice of medicine search warrant justified 6 years of records

A claim of unauthorized practice of medicine authorized a warrant for six years worth of medical files. The good faith exception also applies. United States v. Luzod, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256878 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 30, 2025). As to a … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Unauthorized practice of medicine search warrant justified 6 years of records

D.Mass.: “All records” relating to wire fraud was particular enough

“The warrant here, and, specifically, the attachment describing the items to be seized, satisfied the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement. Kerrissey argues, first, that the attachment was overbroad because it authorized the seizure of ‘“all records, in whatever form” for multiple … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mass.: “All records” relating to wire fraud was particular enough

E.D.Mich.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

There is no standing in a contraband cell phone in prison. United States v. Pouncy, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202490 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 14, 2025). The trial court properly limited the time frame of this warrant when an overbreadth challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Overbreadth, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

E.D.Ky.: If cell phone warrant is overbroad, remedy is to suppress the overbroad part, not all

“Assuming, without deciding, that the Cellphone Warrant was overbroad due to lack of a timeframe limitation, this finding would not mean that all evidence seized under the cellphone warrant is subject to suppression. The proper remedy is to suppress only … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: If cell phone warrant is overbroad, remedy is to suppress the overbroad part, not all

CT: “All data” warrant was unreasonable, but harmless on all the facts

The warrant for “all data” on defendant’s cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement, even though it was limited to two weeks before the murder. Yet, the state’s case was so strong, the cell phone data was harmless beyond … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Probable cause | Comments Off on CT: “All data” warrant was unreasonable, but harmless on all the facts

OR: CP warrant was overbroad

The warrant for defendant’s computer was overbroad in seeking alleged child pornography of others than the known alleged victims, essentially based on assumptions about child pornographers. State v. Schult, 343 Or. App. 376 (Sep. 10, 2025). This is a rarity:

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: CP warrant was overbroad

OR: Cell phone SW was fatally overbroad for scope of search

This cell phone warrant was based on probable cause, and it was particular as to drug related information with a specific time period. However, it was overbroad because it, as the state argued, essentially let the state seize anything else … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Overseizure | Comments Off on OR: Cell phone SW was fatally overbroad for scope of search

S.D.N.Y.: SW can issue to find evidence of a conspiracy

Defendant challenges this search warrant which refers to seeking potential evidence of a conspiracy where the officer only has evidence of overt acts. On the totality, the court finds probable cause and nexus and that the warrant is not overbroad. … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW can issue to find evidence of a conspiracy

W.D.Pa.: Overbreadth of SW determined by what officers did, not what they thought

In this child pornography case, the warrant was narrowed by the attached affidavit. In addition, the generality of the warrant is determined by what the officers did, not what they thought. United States v. Anderson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89056 … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Overbreadth of SW determined by what officers did, not what they thought

D.Kan.: Marion County Record retaliatory newspaper search case

In the Marion County Record case, the now infamous case of a search warrant for a newspaper’s servers and all electronic devices based on a First Amendment retaliation claim, the main Fourth Amendment claim survives the motions to dismiss. The … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Marion County Record retaliatory newspaper search case

CA9: “[E]vidence of dominion and control provision” sought in this CP SW made it overbroad–withdrawn

The “evidence of dominion and control provision” sought in this child pornography search warrant made it overbroad. United States v. Holcomb, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7135 (9th Cir. Mar. 27, 2025) (opinion withdrawn, new opinion to follow, United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: “[E]vidence of dominion and control provision” sought in this CP SW made it overbroad–withdrawn