Monthly Archives: June 2023

NY: Requirement of electronic logging devices of hours trucks are driven is reasonable under NY Const.

Electronic logging devices required under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration adopted in New York survive a facial challenge. “We hold that the warrantless inspections authorized by the regulations fall within the administrative search exception to the warrant requirement and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, State constitution | Comments Off on NY: Requirement of electronic logging devices of hours trucks are driven is reasonable under NY Const.

CA8: Citizen informant’s reports of def having gun in a wheelchair were reliable and provided PC

Citizen informants’ reports of defendant having a firearm in his wheelchair justified the stop and search on probable cause and exigency. United States v. Cunningham, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14638 (8th Cir. June 13, 2023).* Defendant had standing in another … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Citizen informant’s reports of def having gun in a wheelchair were reliable and provided PC

CA10: Despite SW’s overbreadth, executing officers understood the crime under investigation; GFE applies

The warrant was previously held overbroad and the case was remanded to the district court for findings on the good faith exception. In this second appeal, the good faith exception applies. The officers understood the limits in the warrant to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Despite SW’s overbreadth, executing officers understood the crime under investigation; GFE applies

Wired: An Anti-Porn App Put Him in Jail and His Family Under Surveillance

Wired: An Anti-Porn App Put Him in Jail and His Family Under Surveillance by Dhruv Mehrotra (“A court used an app called Covenant Eyes to surveil the family of a man released on bond. Now he’s back in jail, and … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: An Anti-Porn App Put Him in Jail and His Family Under Surveillance

CA10: 2255 petitioner learned after guilty plea A-C communications were recorded in jail; no relief from plea because no effect shown

2255 petitioner was in pretrial incarceration in the private jail in Leavenworth which notoriously recorded conversations between attorneys and clients. He pled guilty with the standard 2255 waiver. This violation of his rights does not survive the waiver, and he … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA10: 2255 petitioner learned after guilty plea A-C communications were recorded in jail; no relief from plea because no effect shown

S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

Searching officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by not leaving a copy of the search warrant, let alone the original. Carter v. Luciano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101723 (S.D. W. Va. June 12, 2023).* The search warrant was based … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

“The district attorney can rely on circumstantial evidence to demonstrate an adequate basis of knowledge for the information conveyed …. But not in this case. The mere fact that the Warrants Squad arrested Lewis at the target location does not … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

The order to a motorist to lower his window is not a search, despite the fact the windows were heavily tinted and it made the interior more visible. Two pounds of cannabis on the car seat was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

NYT: One of the Last Bastions of Digital Privacy Is Under Threat

NYT: One of the Last Bastions of Digital Privacy Is Under Threat by Julia Angwin:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: One of the Last Bastions of Digital Privacy Is Under Threat

Forbes: U.S. Government Buying ‘Intimate’ Data About Americans, Report Finds

Forbes: U.S. Government Buying ‘Intimate’ Data About Americans, Report Finds by Katherine Hamilton of the Forbes Staff (“Data brokers that collect information from Americans’ phones, web browsers and cars have contracts with numerous government agencies to sell them that data, … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Forbes: U.S. Government Buying ‘Intimate’ Data About Americans, Report Finds

ID: Statutory admission of evidence in administrative proceeding is not a separation of powers issue

Admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding over a driver’s license is not governed by the rules of evidence, but it does recognize constitutional limitations. That is not a separation of powers issue because it is within the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Statutory admission of evidence in administrative proceeding is not a separation of powers issue

WaPo: The dos and don’ts of using home security cameras that see everything

WaPo: The dos and don’ts of using home security cameras that see everything by Heather Kelly (“Those same cameras can also put the people who own them at risk. They’re vulnerable to hacks, can collect personal data, and their sensitive … Continue reading

Posted in Video surveillance | Comments Off on WaPo: The dos and don’ts of using home security cameras that see everything

E.D.Mich.: No REP in attorney-client communication in jail 8′ from jailer

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment complaint that attorney-client communications in jail were overheard does not survive summary judgment. He was a mere eight feet from the jailer who could clearly overhear everything. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No REP in attorney-client communication in jail 8′ from jailer

E.D.Wis.: 40 day delay in getting cell phone SW was not unreasonable where def was still in custody and could not possess it

Delays in the case were to work out a plea agreement, not file motions. For that reason, the motion to suppress is denied. On the merits, the 40 day delay in seeking a warrant for his cell phone was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: 40 day delay in getting cell phone SW was not unreasonable where def was still in custody and could not possess it

KY: Officer’s mistake of law on effective date of new traffic law was reasonable and stop not suppressed under Heien

Officer’s mistake of law on the effective date of a new traffic law was reasonable, and the stop would not be suppressed under Heien. Vincent v. Commonwealth, 2023 Ky. App. LEXIS 41 (June 9, 2023):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on KY: Officer’s mistake of law on effective date of new traffic law was reasonable and stop not suppressed under Heien

CA9: Joint Cambodian-U.S. search unlawful under Cambodian law not unlawful here; exclusionary rule not applied

Defendant was the subject of a joint raid in Cambodia by local and U.S. officers. The search of defendant’s room was held unlawful under Cambodian law because there was no written consent of the owner, something with no counterpart in … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Exclusionary rule, Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: Joint Cambodian-U.S. search unlawful under Cambodian law not unlawful here; exclusionary rule not applied

CA10: Govt has to be shown to have property to be ordered to return it under Rule 41(g)

The district court lacked jurisdiction to order return of property under Rule 41(g) because it could not be shown that the government was in possession of the hard drive defendant sought return of. United States v. Toombs, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA10: Govt has to be shown to have property to be ordered to return it under Rule 41(g)

S.D.N.Y.: Surveillance does not have to be constant for PC to exist

Defendant was stopped because officers had reason to believe that he was transporting parts for ghost guns from New England to a gun show in Pennsylvania, and he was stopped in New York City. There is no constitutional requirement that … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Surveillance does not have to be constant for PC to exist

E.D.Mich.: Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure

Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure. United States v. Holmes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99976 (E.D. Mich. June 8, 2023). The trial court erred in suppressing … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Telling a detainee in a traffic stop to come to the rear of the car is not an unreasonable seizure

CA1: Affidavit for CP failed to show any more than child nudity and lacked PC; no GFE either

The search warrant for defendant’s phone was defective and lacked probable cause. Child nudity alone is not child pornography, and the affidavit tracks the statute and doesn’t show that it was pornography. “We hold that the affidavit failed to cross … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA1: Affidavit for CP failed to show any more than child nudity and lacked PC; no GFE either