E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

The order to a motorist to lower his window is not a search, despite the fact the windows were heavily tinted and it made the interior more visible. Two pounds of cannabis on the car seat was probable cause for an automobile exception search. United States v. Stuckey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101278 (E.D. Cal. June 9, 2023).

“The warrant satisfies the three criteria of the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement. It (1) identifies the ‘specific offense’ for which probable cause is established, unlawful possession of a firearm, (2) describes the property to be searched as the location for Whitehead’s alleged church and (3) specifies the types of evidence targeted by the search based on the alleged crime, including ‘[e]vidence concerning occupancy or ownership’ of the Brooklyn church and ‘[f]irearms, ammunition, and firearms accessories.’ See Purcell, 967 F.3d at 178. The warrant is not overbroad, as none of the descriptions are ‘broader than can be justified by the probable cause upon which the warrant is based.’ See id. at 179.” United States v. Whitehead, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100696 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2023).*

Defendant failed to make his substantially preliminary showing for Franks. United States v. Wade, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101206 (M.D. Ga. June 9, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.