Daily Archives: June 3, 2023

OH5, D.Minn.: Not calling additional witnesses at suppression hearing didn’t change outcome

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop here, and defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not calling another witness that wouldn’t have changed the outcome. State v. Ware, 2023-Ohio-1807 (5th Dist. May 30, 2023).* In a tax warrant case, defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH5, D.Minn.: Not calling additional witnesses at suppression hearing didn’t change outcome

NY Co.: SW not timely executed is suppressed

Search warrants in NY have to be executed within ten days. This cell phone warrant wasn’t, so suppression is granted. The order is stayed so the state can decide whether to appeal. People v. Nurse, 2023 NY Slip Op 23167, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY Co.: SW not timely executed is suppressed

VA: Later adopted statutory exclusionary rule not retroactive

A statutory exclusionary rule for a particular action that was adopted after the search and seizure was not retroactive. Moore v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 343 (CMay 30, 2023) (unpublished).* The totality shows reasonable suspicion to extend the stop … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Later adopted statutory exclusionary rule not retroactive

GA: Cell phone call SW was limited and not overbroad

The warrant for the cell phone’s call data was limited in time and reasonable. “Because, using a practical margin of flexibility, the date ranges in the search warrants were as specific as the circumstances and nature of the activity under … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Overbreadth, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone call SW was limited and not overbroad

NJ: Computer return of car owner’s suspended DL justified stop, but it had to end when it was obvious driver was not owner

A police car computer that tells the officer the owner of a vehicle has a suspended license is reasonable suspicion for a stop, unless there is objective evidence the driver cannot be the owner. Here, it was obvious the driver … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NJ: Computer return of car owner’s suspended DL justified stop, but it had to end when it was obvious driver was not owner