Category Archives: Exclusionary rule

D.Mass.: Gun suppressed in FIPF case still not excludable in violation of supervised release

Defendant was an alleged felon in possession and was charged with a new federal crime and a violation of his supervised release. He was sentenced to 22 months on the violation. The gun was suppressed in the new gun case … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Gun suppressed in FIPF case still not excludable in violation of supervised release

IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

Officers checked a law enforcement database and found an arrest warrant on defendant. They rechecked. Afterward, it turned out the warrant had been recalled but was still in the system due to a clerical error. The court will not suppress … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: Arrest on recalled AW not suppressed where officers checked and rechecked it

W.D.Wash.: Not applying exclusionary rule here would put all at risk of police excessive searches

“Here, the Court finds that the officers did not unreasonably extend the scope or duration of the stop. The officers were permitted to ask basic questions of Mr. Russell, including whether he had identification or whether he had any weapons … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Not applying exclusionary rule here would put all at risk of police excessive searches

TX12: Texas livestock officer lacked general law enforcement powers

A special ranger employed by the Texas & Southwest Cattle Raisers Association (TSCRA) recognized as part of the Texas DPS held himself out to be a law enforcement officer. Special rangers are limited to livestock and limited offenses. Instead, he … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TX12: Texas livestock officer lacked general law enforcement powers

Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp

She’s an accidental pioneer. The Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp by Richard Perrins (“The Elyria YWCA held an event Wednesday to teach about Dollree Mapp, a Cleveland woman whose Supreme Court case set … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp

WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

The Washington State constitutional exclusionary rule is categorical and a privacy violation almost always results in exclusion. They had already rejected the good faith exception under state law. Here, it was attenuation, and a new crime alone isn’t enough. State … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

OH3: Even where the SW return was overlooked for a year, no exclusion

The state violated its rule 41 because the return was a year late. The exclusionary rule applies to constitutional violations, not rule violations, and the trial court erred in fashioning its own exclusionary rule here. State v. Nevels, 2024-Ohio-4964, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH3: Even where the SW return was overlooked for a year, no exclusion

D.Idaho: The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations

The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations. Indeed, previously suppressed evidence can be considered on the factors for release. United States v. Cuevas, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185724 (D. Idaho Oct. 9, 2024). “Assuming without deciding that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Idaho: The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations

CA10: State officers investigating murder on an Indian reservation without jurisdiction does not lead to suppression of evidence

State law enforcement officers investigated a murder on the Muscogee Creek Reservation which at the time was not necessarily legal but two years later was not. The murder was prosecuted in federal court. There is no dispute the officers lacked … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: State officers investigating murder on an Indian reservation without jurisdiction does not lead to suppression of evidence

CT: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases, here one over animal neglect

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to civil cases, here an action over who gets possession of neglected animals. State ex rel. Dunn v. Connelly, 2024 Conn. App. LEXIS 268 (Oct. 8, 2024). This is a DUI on federal property. Even … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CT: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases, here one over animal neglect

CO: Unlawfully obtained cell phone PIN used to search phone required suppression

The police unlawfully obtained defendant’s cell phone’s 6-digit PIN number to access his phone after a failed “brute force attack” attempting to get into the phone. That required suppression of the cell phone. People v. d’Estree, 2024 COA 106, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CO: Unlawfully obtained cell phone PIN used to search phone required suppression

CA6: New evidence of possible Franks violation for successor habeas not adequate to possibly alter outcome

2255 petitioner’s successor petition claims newly discovered evidence from an FOIA response that casts doubt on the affidavit for the search warrant obtained in 2011. “So Duval has not shown that the search warrant affidavit contained a false statement. Nor … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: New evidence of possible Franks violation for successor habeas not adequate to possibly alter outcome

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases in Alaska. Alaska R.E. 412. O’Brien v. Delaplain, 2024 Alas. LEXIS 99 n.35(Sep. 27, 2024). The officer’s observations on a table near the door from outside the dwelling during a knock-and-talk provided … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in civil cases

OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

Neither the state nor federal exclusionary rule does not apply in criminal dangerous person civil commitments. State v. T.L.B. (In re T.L.B.), 335 Or. App. 225 (Sep. 25, 2024). The officer here saw defendant walking at night in a neighborhood … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to criminally dangerous person civil commitments

PA: The Rule of Law here counsels against suppression for a jurisdictional violation

A stop outside the officer’s jurisdiction in violation of statute should not lead to suppression of evidence. The rule of law counsels against suppression. The jurisdictional statutes are for accountabiliy. Commonwealth v. Eakin, 2024 PA Super 222, 2024 Pa. Super. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on PA: The Rule of Law here counsels against suppression for a jurisdictional violation

D.Conn.: LEO accessing public social media accounts doesn’t implicate 4A

A prison security official’s accessing a potential visitor’s social media accounts to determine whether the visitor is some kind of security threat doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Lawrence v. Zack, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161377 (D. Conn. Sep. 9, 2024). … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants | Comments Off on D.Conn.: LEO accessing public social media accounts doesn’t implicate 4A

D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI

Based on circuit authority, a stop and arrest for fictitious tags justifies a search incident on the driver. United States v. Jones, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161352 (E.D. Wis. Sep. 9, 2024), quoting United States v. Travis, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Fictitious tags stop justifies SI

MA: Investigative equal protection claim can be enforced by DA’s discovery failure

Defendant raised an equal protection claim about discovery of ShapChat search warrants. Defense counsel stated that an informal survey of defense lawyers handling about 1/4th of the cases in Suffolk County showed that 85% of the warrants were against black … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Investigative equal protection claim can be enforced by DA’s discovery failure

M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

The officer reasonably relied on a report from dispatch that defendant had a DV order of protection against him by his wife. After the stop and the inventory for towing his car, his estranged wife showed up with a copy … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Under Evans, DV OP justified stop that led to inventory even though it had unknowingly been set aside

NM: Def’s new crime after arrest not to be excluded

“We agree with the Court of Appeals that the new crime exception to the exclusionary rule applies and we agree with its analysis of the issue. The exclusionary rule applies only where its deterrence benefits outweigh its societal costs. Strieff, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Def’s new crime after arrest not to be excluded