NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

“The district attorney can rely on circumstantial evidence to demonstrate an adequate basis of knowledge for the information conveyed …. But not in this case. The mere fact that the Warrants Squad arrested Lewis at the target location does not support a reasonable inference that Lewis resided there. Perhaps that inference could have been drawn if the affidavit had stated why the Warrants Squad went to the target location on the day of the arrest or who, if anyone, was interviewed by the Warrants Squad that day or at that location, and what was learned from any such interview. But no information like that was supplied in the supporting affidavit.” People v. Dennis, 2023 NY Slip Op 50561(U) (Kings Co. June 12, 2023).*

Hill was transporting meth from Los Angeles to Cleveland when he was stopped at the Greyhound station in Omaha. He consented to a search of the bag. He said that defendant packed the bag. He agreed to follow through on the trip, and defendant met him in Cleveland. They were joint users of the bag, and Hill could consent to the search. United States v. Hayward, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14470 (6th Cir. June 8, 2023).*

In this second appeal of an excessive force case, plaintiffs’ decedent was killed because he had his gun to his head and allegedly moved it toward the officers. Based on the forensic expert, it could not have happened that way, and it was reversed again. This is a jury question. Partridge v. City of Benton, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 14531 (8th Cir. June 12, 2023) (2-1).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Excessive force, Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.