Daily Archives: June 13, 2023

Wired: An Anti-Porn App Put Him in Jail and His Family Under Surveillance

Wired: An Anti-Porn App Put Him in Jail and His Family Under Surveillance by Dhruv Mehrotra (“A court used an app called Covenant Eyes to surveil the family of a man released on bond. Now he’s back in jail, and … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: An Anti-Porn App Put Him in Jail and His Family Under Surveillance

CA10: 2255 petitioner learned after guilty plea A-C communications were recorded in jail; no relief from plea because no effect shown

2255 petitioner was in pretrial incarceration in the private jail in Leavenworth which notoriously recorded conversations between attorneys and clients. He pled guilty with the standard 2255 waiver. This violation of his rights does not survive the waiver, and he … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA10: 2255 petitioner learned after guilty plea A-C communications were recorded in jail; no relief from plea because no effect shown

S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

Searching officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by not leaving a copy of the search warrant, let alone the original. Carter v. Luciano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101723 (S.D. W. Va. June 12, 2023).* The search warrant was based … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

“The district attorney can rely on circumstantial evidence to demonstrate an adequate basis of knowledge for the information conveyed …. But not in this case. The mere fact that the Warrants Squad arrested Lewis at the target location does not … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: State can rely on circumstantial evidence to support CIs

E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

The order to a motorist to lower his window is not a search, despite the fact the windows were heavily tinted and it made the interior more visible. Two pounds of cannabis on the car seat was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

NYT: One of the Last Bastions of Digital Privacy Is Under Threat

NYT: One of the Last Bastions of Digital Privacy Is Under Threat by Julia Angwin:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: One of the Last Bastions of Digital Privacy Is Under Threat