Category Archives: Automobile exception

TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

Defense counsel’s motion to suppress coming during trial at the end of the officer’s testimony wasn’t timely. Brown v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 1014 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) Feb. 3, 2026)* (unpublished). An automobile exception search can … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, DNA, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on TX1: Motion to suppress after officer testified at trial not timely

Cal.: Loose MJ on a car floorboard is not a violation of the MJ “open container” provision

“Enacted as part of California’s legalization of marijuana, Health and Safety Code section 11362.3, subdivision (a)(4) makes it an infraction to have an ‘open container’ of marijuana in a vehicle. The question before us is whether a small amount of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.: Loose MJ on a car floorboard is not a violation of the MJ “open container” provision

D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

There was probable cause for the stop and search of defendant’s car before the pretextual stop. Therefore, it was all valid. United States v. Nieves, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 272309 (D. Minn. Dec. 1, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

Responding to a call, defendant fairly matched the description. When he would not identify himself, it was reasonable to handcuff him for a few minutes while it was sorted out. United States v. Troupe, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9010 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Refusal to promptly ID oneself justified handcuffing during brief investigative detention

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

Pennsylvania’s automobile exception is more stringent than the Fourth Amendment requiring exigency. The state can’t end run a refusal to consent by impounding a car to get into it. Commonwealth v. Rosario, 2025 PA Super 286 (Dec. 23, 2025). “First, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Officer can’t impound a car just to avoid state automobile exception

D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

The issuing judge taking ten minutes to review an affidavit for warrant does not show that he or she abandoned the role of a neutral and detached magistrate. [I can usually see probable cause in an affidavit in 30-45 seconds. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

The state’s failure to litigate standing at the suppression hearing is its waiver. On the merits, the information failed to show probable cause via collective knowledge. Seizure of bloody clothing in a bag in the hallway outside the ER was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

A murder for hire scheme was exigency for a warrantless search. Here, the officers thought the firearm would be moved imminently on December 31, 2024, but the warrant wasn’t signed until after midnight January 1, 2025. It wasn’t automatically stale, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

W.D.N.C.: PC for car moots Gant argument

Defendant argues that the search of his car was void under Gant because he was handcuffed outside it. There was, however, probable cause for a vehicle search. United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209424 (W.D.N.C. Sep. 3, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Nexus, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: PC for car moots Gant argument

OH1: With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself

With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself. “While the smell of marijuana remains a relevant factor under the totality of the circumstances to a probable-cause analysis, it is no longer sufficient, standing … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH1: With legalization of marijuana, the smell of marijuana is no longer probable cause in itself

E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

This geofence warrant was slightly different than Chatrie’s. Still, the good faith exception applies. “In this case, law enforcement acted pursuant to a warrant that was not so facially deficient that the executing officers could not reasonably presume it to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, geofence, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

Plain view of bullet holes in defendant’s truck justified its seizure and transport to police impound lot where it was searched with a warrant. Lee v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7569 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 30, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

“At the time the officers swore out and executed the warrant, the officers believed 4279 Violet Circle was a single-family home that Schmitz occupied.” The officers’ investigation for months never indicated that the premises included three efficiency apartments. “In sum, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Officers reasonably concluded that this was one residence without apartments

E.D.N.C.: Person with lock on a storage unit has apparent authority to consent to its search

The person with a lock on a storage unit, even though not the renter, has apparent authority to consent to its search. United States v. Gibson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178083 (E.D.N.C. Sep. 11, 2025). Rule 41 doesn’t mandate a … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Automobile exception, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Person with lock on a storage unit has apparent authority to consent to its search

TX2: No REP in public area of business

The state violated no reasonable expectation of privacy by entering the public area of a business. Tucker v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 6617 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Aug. 26, 2025). Exigency not required for automobile exception search on … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX2: No REP in public area of business

VA: Drugs on the person during a stop led to PC for vehicle

The patdown of defendant’s person produced drugs. That gave probable cause to search the car too. McCoy v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 445 (Aug. 5, 2025). The state gets a hearing on whether there was additional information they had … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on VA: Drugs on the person during a stop led to PC for vehicle

NJ: State const. requires SW for car parked at state police barracks after DUI arrest

Under the New Jersey Constitution, a car impounded after a DUI arrest and parked at the State Police barracks is not subject to the automobile exception. A warrant is required. State v. Fenimore, 2025 N.J. LEXIS 747 (July 30, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ: State const. requires SW for car parked at state police barracks after DUI arrest

CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

Defendant’s driveway was not curtilage, so his stop and ultimate search of the car was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Moses, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16484 (3d Cir. July 3, 2025). De minimis force, even … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

NE: Cell phone search in Belize was valid there, admissible here; no joint venture shown

Defendant was charged with murder and ultimately arrested in Belize and deported. His Belize cell phone was valid under their law, and he doesn’t show a joint venture in the phone search. State v. Scott, 319 Neb. 153 (June 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Foreign searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Cell phone search in Belize was valid there, admissible here; no joint venture shown