Category Archives: Neutral and detached magistrate

DC: Affidavit’s complete failure to show nexus is a lack of PC and good faith

Without something to go on, the court declines to ascribe a supposed error in an address as a mere typo. Moreover, the affidavit fails to provide any nexus to defendant and the place to be searched, and the good faith … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on DC: Affidavit’s complete failure to show nexus is a lack of PC and good faith

D.N.D.: The fact the state judge issuing the SW represented a potential witness named in the affidavit didn’t make him not “neutral and detached”

The search warrant issuing state judge was not a neutral and detached magistrate just because he previously represented a potential witness in the case whose name was in the affidavit. There certainly was probable cause. Besides, the good faith exception … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Pretext | Comments Off on D.N.D.: The fact the state judge issuing the SW represented a potential witness named in the affidavit didn’t make him not “neutral and detached”

N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

There were factual mistakes in the affidavit for search warrant, but it doesn’t undermine the probable cause showing. In any event, the mistakes are in good faith and the good faith exception applies. United States v. Naum, 2019 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Factual mistakes in the affidavit for SW didn’t undermine the factual showing; the GFE also applies

D.Minn.: USMJ who issues SW doesn’t have to recuse from deciding motion to suppress

The USMJ who issued the search warrant doesn’t need to recuse from deciding on a motion to suppress that warrant. “The Court also concludes that Strieff controls the analysis of Defendant’s challenge to his stop in Rock Island, Illinois. In … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Minn.: USMJ who issues SW doesn’t have to recuse from deciding motion to suppress

GA: Probate judge could issue SW under state law

It wasn’t a violation of state law that a probate judge signed the search warrant in this case. Joyner v. State, 2018 Ga. App. LEXIS 474 (Aug. 3, 2018). Defendant’s DNA was found on bullet casings, and that was added … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on GA: Probate judge could issue SW under state law

CA9: Def shows issuing magistrate on arrest warrant wasn’t neutral and detached, but he still loses to GFE

The Ninth Circuit recognizes judicial abandonment under the neutral and detached magistrate requirement, but defendant here still loses. The officers arresting him on the warrant weren’t there when the judicial officer failed to read the papers, and they had no … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA9: Def shows issuing magistrate on arrest warrant wasn’t neutral and detached, but he still loses to GFE

NY3: Neutral and detached magistrate claim has to be preserved for appeal

Defendant’s claim that the issuing magistrate was not neutral and detached was not preserved for appellate review. And, in any event, it lacks merit because there was plenty of probable cause. People v. Schaefer, 2018 NY Slip Op 05235, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on NY3: Neutral and detached magistrate claim has to be preserved for appeal

NM: State’s DNA collection act const’l under King; def has no interest in whether his DNA might end up tested against a cold case was lawfully collected

The state has an interest in collecting DNA from arrestees, and King is followed. Defendant doesn’t make any credible argument why the state constitution should be applied except that he shouldn’t have his DNA compared to that on file from … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Neutral and detached magistrate, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: State’s DNA collection act const’l under King; def has no interest in whether his DNA might end up tested against a cold case was lawfully collected

D.Mass.: USMJ’s spouse’s employment as a doctor at a related institution that was a victim doesn’t make her not neutral and detached when she signs SW

The USMJ here was still neutral and detached. The victim of the crime was a non-profit associated with Harvard. Her husband worked as a doctor for hospital associated with Harvard. That wasn’t a close enough relationship to require recusal. United … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Mass.: USMJ’s spouse’s employment as a doctor at a related institution that was a victim doesn’t make her not neutral and detached when she signs SW

MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

The fact the issuing judge issued another for a relative a decade earlier didn’t show the judge was not a neutral and detached magistrate. There was probable cause for this search warrant. Donaldson v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 303 … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on MS: Issuing a SW for a person with a similar name a decade earlier didn’t make magistrate not neutral and detached

UT: The fact an electronic warrant application is acted on quickly doesn’t mean reviewing court should be “skeptical” of PC finding

This case started with a cell phone stolen from a customer in a grocery store. The police pinged the phone and it came back as being located at defendant’s house. Police went there to talk to defendant, and he had … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on UT: The fact an electronic warrant application is acted on quickly doesn’t mean reviewing court should be “skeptical” of PC finding

N.D.Ohio: Merely alleging the affiant never appeared before the issuing magistrate to sign it is nothing without proof to support it

Merely alleging the affiant never appeared before the issuing magistrate to sign it is nothing without proof to support it. The warrant says the affiant did. United States v. Oliver, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85865 (N.D. Ohio May 22, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Merely alleging the affiant never appeared before the issuing magistrate to sign it is nothing without proof to support it