Category Archives: Neutral and detached magistrate

D.Haw.: Ex parte communications about SW issuance don’t require later recusal

The fact there were ex parte communications with a judge about a wiretap warrant doesn’t require recusal of the judge. United States v. Kobayashi, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220121 (D. Haw. Sep. 28, 2026). Plaintiff can’t show causation for his … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Excessive force, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Ex parte communications about SW issuance don’t require later recusal

NM: Trial court’s finding of consent is reversed because the court engaged in its own internet investigation beyond what the parties provided

The suppression order for defendant on coerced consent is reversed. The trial court engaged in its own research into facts to make the decision on acquiring the affidavit for a later warrant, the distance between things, and the temperature at … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Probation / Parole search, Standards of review | Comments Off on NM: Trial court’s finding of consent is reversed because the court engaged in its own internet investigation beyond what the parties provided

W.D.Wash.: No 2255 discovery of SW materials based on mere speculation

In this 2255, petitioner doesn’t get discovery of his search warrant materials. “The Government responds that Wilson ‘has failed to provide good cause as to why he is entitled to the materials that he requests’ and instead, he ‘only speculates … Continue reading →

Posted in Discovery, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 2255 discovery of SW materials based on mere speculation

ID: Hospital collecting umbilical cord blood conducted a private search

A hospital collecting umbilical cord blood after a birth was not a state actor nor acting at law enforcement’s request or suggestion. This was a private search, and the blood tested positive for drugs. State v. Kawano, 2026 Ida. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Pretext, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Hospital collecting umbilical cord blood conducted a private search

W.D.Tex.: What is the duty of the neutral and detached magistrate?

What is the duty of the neutral and detached magistrate? It’s explained in In re A Search of A Certain Apple iCloud Acct., 2026 WL 2534328, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193213 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2026):

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: What is the duty of the neutral and detached magistrate?

OH7: Magistrate signing SW for something outside of territorial jurisdiction not a 4A violation

A municipal court judge issuing a search warrant for something outside his or her territorial jurisdiction is a nonfundamental error that does not require suppression of the evidence. State v. Mele, 2026-Ohio-2604, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 2537 (7th Dist. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on OH7: Magistrate signing SW for something outside of territorial jurisdiction not a 4A violation

N.D.Ala.: SW not invalid because issuing judge previously represented the target

A search warrant isn’t invalid just because the issuing magistrate previously represented the defendant in a drug case as a defense lawyer. The judge didn’t violate the state’s Code of Judicial Conduct either. Besides, the good faith exception applies because … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: SW not invalid because issuing judge previously represented the target

MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, defendant gets to reopen the suppression issue. Here, the officer’s false statement he was present for a third controlled buy satisfied Franks and was excised. Defense counsel showed that it couldn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on MA: When a likely Franks violation comes out at trial, def gets to reopen the suppression issue

OH5: Judge who issued SW could preside at trial

Defendant doesn’t show judicial bias at trial because the trial judge issued the search warrant two years earlier and didn’t remember it until during trial. No affidavit of bias filed. State v. Baker, 2026-Ohio-1628 (5th Dist. May 5, 2026). The … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Independent source, Neutral and detached magistrate, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: Judge who issued SW could preside at trial

CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

Being tried and acquitted of murder, plaintiff sued the police who arrested her. She had an affirmative defense which led to the acquittal. Failure to present conclusive evidence of an affirmative defense to the issuing magistrate would be a probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

A search warrant application that was notarized with an expired notary stamp was not a Fourth Amendment violation. McAlister v. Kansas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55139 (D. Kan. Mar. 17, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

D.S.D.: Volatile home situation justified sweep for gun

A volatile situation in the house justified an exigency search (or sweep) of other rooms for a weapon. United States v. Boyd, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38079 (D.S.D. Feb. 23, 2026).* 2254 petitioner’s CSLI claim and trial were all before … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Volatile home situation justified sweep for gun

D.Colo.: Prospective relief against judge-authorized administrative warrants denied

Plaintiff was the subject of an administrative warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate. The request for prospective relief is denied, and the complaint is dismissed. Waldrop v. Colo. Dep’t of Agric., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27532 (D. Colo. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Prospective relief against judge-authorized administrative warrants denied

CA10: Inconsistency in travel plans isn’t RS per se; officer has to see that they’re lying

Inconsistency in travel plans alone isn’t reasonable suspicion to extend a vehicle stop. The officer has to conclude that one of the occupants was lying about plans. “A trooper can reasonably suspect criminal activity when a driver and passenger lie … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Inconsistency in travel plans isn’t RS per se; officer has to see that they’re lying

Cal.: Loose MJ on a car floorboard is not a violation of the MJ “open container” provision

“Enacted as part of California’s legalization of marijuana, Health and Safety Code section 11362.3, subdivision (a)(4) makes it an infraction to have an ‘open container’ of marijuana in a vehicle. The question before us is whether a small amount of … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.: Loose MJ on a car floorboard is not a violation of the MJ “open container” provision

DE: Judge issuing track and trace order didn’t have to recuse from trial

The fact “the judge who presided over trial had signed a pen register or ‘track and trace’ warrant before [defendant’s] arrest” didn’t require recusal. The state court had already held issuing a search warrant didn’t require recusal either. Fayton v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Judge issuing track and trace order didn’t have to recuse from trial

D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

The issuing magistrate is not shown to be an adjunct law enforcement officer just because the judge shares an address with a police department. Martinez v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 268655 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2025). The search incident of … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

Even if the passcode was obtained unreasonably, this iPhone would have been gotten into anyway. The officer had done it before on these earlier models, and that’s inevitable discovery. United States v. Fassero, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 265273 (C.D. Ill. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Neutral and detached magistrate, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Easily entered iPhone moots how passcode was obtained

D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

The issuing judge taking ten minutes to review an affidavit for warrant does not show that he or she abandoned the role of a neutral and detached magistrate. [I can usually see probable cause in an affidavit in 30-45 seconds. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Taking 10 minutes to review a SW affidavit doesn’t show magistrate not neutral and detached

TX7: SW sworn to before wrong official still in good faith

While the search warrant affidavit was not sworn to before the correct official as required by statute, the good faith exception is enough to sustain this search. There was probable cause, and it was particular. All constitutional requirements were met. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on TX7: SW sworn to before wrong official still in good faith