D.Vt.: Coast Guard’s reboarding boat was with PC

It was revealed there was a firearm on board, and a later warrants check revealed a conviction that was wrong. Yet, it turned out later there was yet another not mentioned. The Coast Guard reboarded and took the gun and arrested the felon in possession. The reboarding was with probable cause, even if it was required. United States v. Robistow, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94150 (D. Vt. May 14, 2025):

Given that a stop premised upon a mistake of law is permissible in the Fourth Amendment context when, despite the mistake, there is a valid basis for the stop, it seems that a mistake of fact would be comparably treated in light of the underlying purpose of the exclusionary rule. Although the second boarding of Defendant’s vessel was premised upon two felony convictions that did not exist, Defendant did indeed have a felony conviction. The reality of Defendant’s felony conviction along with the presence of firearms on the vessel satisfy the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. While the court does not find the second stop, by itself, constituted a de facto arrest, even if it did, it was supported by probable cause. The court finds that the Coast Guard lawfully boarded Defendant’s vessel. Defendant conceded that, if the second boarding was lawful, there would be no basis to suppress evidence of the firearms and ammunition found on the Sonata. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized is DENIED.

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Automobile exception. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.