Category Archives: Motion to suppress

D.Ariz.: Raising a search issue 5 months after conviction is a little too late

Defendant’s suppression argument five months after conviction is too late. Besides, it doesn’t allege anything of substance anyway. United States v. Alahmedalabdaloklah, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189719 (D. Ariz. Nov. 6, 2018).* Defendant’s search claim is denied without even telling … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Raising a search issue 5 months after conviction is a little too late

D.Minn.: Res judicata doesn’t bar relitigating motion to suppress within same proceeding

A ruling on a motion to suppress during the proceedings is subject to change. It is not governed by res judicata because it isn’t final. United States v. Baez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184017 (D. Minn. Aug. 30, 2018), adopted, … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Res judicata doesn’t bar relitigating motion to suppress within same proceeding

DE: Motion deadlines are there for a reason; the defense doesn’t show “exceptional circumstances” to overcome the deadline

There are motion deadlines for a reason. Former defense counsel reviewed the file and didn’t see a basis for a motion to suppress. Another defense lawyer came in and did. The excuse for getting around the deadline is late disclosure … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Motion deadlines are there for a reason; the defense doesn’t show “exceptional circumstances” to overcome the deadline

WV: Def can’t show abuse of discretion for trial court to not consider oral motion to suppress instead of a written one

Defendant can’t show an abuse of discretion from the trial judge’s declining to consider an oral motion to suppress. The rule says it’s in the discretion of the trial court. State v. Gaiser, 2018 W. Va. LEXIS 370 (May 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on WV: Def can’t show abuse of discretion for trial court to not consider oral motion to suppress instead of a written one

NY4: Oral motion to suppress denied; has to be written

An oral motion to suppress fails. It was required to be in writing for the record. People v. Hinojoso-Soto, 2018 NY Slip Op 03264, 2018 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3195 (4th Dept. May 4, 2018). Driving a car at a … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY4: Oral motion to suppress denied; has to be written

NE: A motion in limine is not a substitute for a motion to suppress

“A suppression hearing is preparatory, because it relates to auxiliary issues not immediately relevant to the question of guilt and is held in anticipation of certain evidence being introduced at a forthcoming trial.” A motion in limine is not a … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NE: A motion in limine is not a substitute for a motion to suppress

CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

“Sweeney neither challenged the finding of untimeliness before the district court, nor does he now argue that his delay in filing the motion to suppress was excused by good cause. As such, because of his waiver, we need not address … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW judicially estopped govt to claim no standing

The affidavit for the search warrant alleged the house was defendant’s house. The government was judicially estopped from claiming otherwise in the proceeding without real evidence the affidavit was wrong. [I’ve been arguing this for years; see Treatise § 4.03.] … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW judicially estopped govt to claim no standing

W.D.Ky.: Motion to reconsider denial of motion to suppress only raised a trial issue, not a suppression issue, so denied

Defendant’s motion to reconsider the prior denial of a motion to suppress is denied because he raises essentially only an issue for trial as to where a gun was found, not to suppress evidence. United States v. Keeling, 2018 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Motion to reconsider denial of motion to suppress only raised a trial issue, not a suppression issue, so denied

NY4: Man with a gun report led police within one minute to couple on street, and def abandoned gun

Police received a call of a man with a shotgun walking with a woman. Officers got there within a minute and saw a couple matching the description. No lights or siren were on. Defendant walked into a grassy area and … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY4: Man with a gun report led police within one minute to couple on street, and def abandoned gun

W.D.N.C.: Def counsel’s busy schedule not “good cause” for motion to file motion to suppress out of time

“In his amended motion for leave, counsel admits that he received the discovery in this matter from the Government on or about October 19, 2017, but states that he was not ‘in a position to effectively review’ such materials until … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def counsel’s busy schedule not “good cause” for motion to file motion to suppress out of time

CA8: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply to suppression hearings; hearsay commonly used

Defendant was added to a conspiracy case after the codefendants had a suppression hearing. It was at first agreed that their suppression hearing testimony could be considered as to defendant as well, but then defendant equivocated on that. To some … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA8: Confrontation clause doesn’t apply to suppression hearings; hearsay commonly used