Category Archives: Issue preclusion

D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

Hawai’i’s Covid quarantines were not Fourth Amendment seizures to aid government intrusions. For Our Rights v. Ige, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66956 (D. Haw. Apr. 17, 2023). Exigent circumstances for warrantless police action is based on an objective standard. United … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge was conclusory and based on mere typographical errors. United States v. Howard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9069 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023). Habeas petitioner’s admission of procedural default of his Fourth Amendment claim was an admission there … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

S.D.Ill.: Strategy under Strickland for defense to admit SW affidavit into evidence

It was not unreasonable strategy for the defense to admit at trial the affidavit for his search warrant to challenge the quality of the investigation that the search produced nothing and the informant wasn’t reliable. He was acquitted of one … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Strategy under Strickland for defense to admit SW affidavit into evidence

OH5: Admission of MJ but no MMJ card was PC

Admission there was marijuana in the car and nobody had a MMJ card was probable cause. State v. Hale, 2023-Ohio-1057, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 1025 (5th Dist. Mar. 30, 2023). A conclusory allegation that false information in an affidavit for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Overseizure, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Admission of MJ but no MMJ card was PC

SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

Murder case: A highway checkpoint with four officers to check DLs, registration, and insurance was valid under Prouse, Sitz, and Edmund. No suggestion it was for general crime control. State v. Jones, 2023 S.C. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 29, 2023). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Roadblocks, Standing | Comments Off on SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases. Villafane v. City of N.Y., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52149 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2023). There was probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s DNA. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

D.N.M.: Search warrants are directed at places, not persons; offender need not be mentioned

Search warrants are directed at places, not persons. “Because, at the time of the oral affidavit, there was a fair probability the crime of kidnapping occurred and a fair probability evidence of that crime would be found in Defendant’s home … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Search warrants are directed at places, not persons; offender need not be mentioned

OH3: Look behind refrigerator during exigent entry was inadvertent plain view

The warrantless entry into defendant’s house was justified by the exigency of a child allegedly in peril, which was not in dispute. While waiting for paperwork to be completed, one officer could see slightly behind the refrigerator and saw packaged … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH3: Look behind refrigerator during exigent entry was inadvertent plain view

OR: Cell phone SW in part for “evidence related to the crimes under investigation” was overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone was specific as to particular images but general as to others, and it is suppressed as to the others. “The fact that the media command limited the media search to ‘evidence related to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Overbreadth | Comments Off on OR: Cell phone SW in part for “evidence related to the crimes under investigation” was overbroad

D.Md.: Being handcuffed means one could believe he or she is not free to leave

Handcuffing a person is a sure sign they are not free to leave. Here, however, it was justified by defendant’s own actions. United States v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22159 (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2023).* A successor habeas doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Md.: Being handcuffed means one could believe he or she is not free to leave

ND: Trial court’s finding of investigatory purpose for inventory search supported by record

The district court found that the purported inventory search was really for investigatory purposes, and the evidence supports that conclusion. The inevitable discovery exception also does not apply here. State v. Krall, 2023 ND 8, 2023 N.D. LEXIS 9 (Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Inventory, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Trial court’s finding of investigatory purpose for inventory search supported by record

CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

Officer’s failure to turn on his bodycam before frisk here doesn’t require an adverse inference of destruction of evidence. Bad faith isn’t shown. United States v. Aguirre-Cuenca, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105 (4th Cir. Jan. 18, 2023). Defendant’s appeal is … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

W.D.N.Y.: Moving car without PC for later dog sniff hours later tainted SW based on dog alert

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped and ultimately removed to another location for a dog sniff to get probable cause for a search warrant for the car. The removal was unreasonable and justified under the Fourth Amendment. The dog sniff was several … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Moving car without PC for later dog sniff hours later tainted SW based on dog alert

D.Minn.: Involuntary civil detainees in a sex offender program have no REP in their rooms

Involuntary civil detainees in a sex offender program have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their rooms. White v. Dayton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71 (D. Minn. Jan. 3, 2023). Habeas petitioner’s claim that a bad photo ID led to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Involuntary civil detainees in a sex offender program have no REP in their rooms

E.D.Mich.: No sanction for automatic purge of bodycam video of this raid

The raid in this case was recorded on bodycams but the official retention policy at the time was to hold video for only 60 days unless it was flagged to be kept despite the fact that cases take longer than … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Community caretaking function, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No sanction for automatic purge of bodycam video of this raid

M.D.Fla.: The fact a USMJ issued SW doesn’t preclude that judge from hearing a motion to suppress

The fact a USMJ issued a search warrant doesn’t preclude that judge from hearing a motion to suppress. United States v. Silva, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 233243 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 2022). State court’s finding of procedural default on Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The fact a USMJ issued SW doesn’t preclude that judge from hearing a motion to suppress

OR: Computer hard drive with contraband could be destroyed with guilty plea

By defendant’s plea to a sex and child porn offense, the state could destroy the computer hard drives where the contraband was found. The seizure was in 2003, and the trial was 2017. State v. Forker, 323 Or. App. 323 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OR: Computer hard drive with contraband could be destroyed with guilty plea

CA9: 4A requires no less intrusive measures for inventory

The officers impounding defendant’s vehicle weren’t constitutionally required to allow him to contact others to take possession of the vehicle for him. United States v. Anderson, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 35865 (9th Cir. Dec. 29, 2022). See Metropolitan News-Enterprise Three … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA9: 4A requires no less intrusive measures for inventory

CA3: SOL for arrest and search under § 1983 runs from then

The SOL begins with plaintiff’s arrest and search, not the prosecution. Here it was time-barred. (Plaintiff also doesn’t establish any grounds for equitable tolling other than the library was inaccessible during Covid, and he did nothing for over two years.) … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA3: SOL for arrest and search under § 1983 runs from then

S.D.Ill.: Overheard comment CI would be harmed was RS for stop

Overheard information that defendant was traveling to Cape Girardeau, Missouri to harm a CI was reasonable suspicion for his stop. When a dog alerted, too, that permitted a search anywhere in the car where drugs could be hidden. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Overheard comment CI would be harmed was RS for stop