Category Archives: Private search

N.D.Tex.: Drone flyover approved by SW led to SW for residence

In a dog fighting investigation, Dallas PD [showing great respect for the rights of a homeowner] got a drone fly over warrant for residential property. Seeing dogs chained up in a dog fighting training configuration, officers obtained a search warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Drones, Good faith exception, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Drone flyover approved by SW led to SW for residence

PA: 18 U.S.C. § 2558A doesn’t mandate social media searches, only reporting what they discover; still a private search

The searches of social media by Facebook and Google then reported to NCMEC were private searches. The fact there’s a duty to report that which they find doesn’t mean any searches were mandated by government. Commonwealth v. Thomas, 2026 PA … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search | Comments Off on PA: 18 U.S.C. § 2558A doesn’t mandate social media searches, only reporting what they discover; still a private search

E.D.Mich.: ER nurse’s finding shell casing in def’s pants was private search

Defendant was in the ER and the hospital had his clothes. A spent shell casing was discovered in his pants by a nurse and it was turned over to the police. That was a private search. United States v. Young, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Private search, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: ER nurse’s finding shell casing in def’s pants was private search

ID: Hospital collecting umbilical cord blood conducted a private search

A hospital collecting umbilical cord blood after a birth was not a state actor nor acting at law enforcement’s request or suggestion. This was a private search, and the blood tested positive for drugs. State v. Kawano, 2026 Ida. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Pretext, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Hospital collecting umbilical cord blood conducted a private search

CA11: Google computer’s CSAM hash value search and match was private search, noting circuit split

A Google computer’s hash value match of a file passing through Google to a CSAM image then forwarded on to NCMEC was a private search. The court agrees with the Fifth and Sixth Circuits holding that the private search doctrine … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search | Comments Off on CA11: Google computer’s CSAM hash value search and match was private search, noting circuit split

SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

Defendant submitted to GPS monitoring by his bondsman as a condition of bail, and the police could call the bondsman for the GPS information to connect defendant to a new crime without a warrant. State v. Eberhart, 2026 S.C. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on SC: Police didn’t need a SW to access def’s bondsman’s GPS monitoring of him because he agreed to GPS monitoring for release

E.D.Mo.: Ubiquity of cell phones here satisfied nexus without stating it

This is about a search warrant issued in an arson investigation and defendant’s claim of lack of nexus. The ubiquity of cell phones means that the officers did not even have to state that they knew defendant had one. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Ubiquity of cell phones here satisfied nexus without stating it

TN: Drug history essentially shows nexus to cell phone

Defendant’s drug history was essentially enough to show nexus to a cell phone. State v. White, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 131 (Mar. 13, 2026). A civil standby with a police officer for an apartment inspection didn’t violate the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Private search, Search | Comments Off on TN: Drug history essentially shows nexus to cell phone

WI: Google’s scans of user content for CSAM is a private search

It’s a private search when Google scans user consent for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and then it reports to law enforcement what it finds. It is not required to search, only to report what it finds. [Note that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on WI: Google’s scans of user content for CSAM is a private search

GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

Private search: Defendant let someone use his computer and that person found two incriminating letters which were turned over to the police. Bunn v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Feb. 25, 2026).* The parties agreed that references to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

W.D.Tenn.: No standing in GPS locator of car rented by another; also private search

Defendant had no standing to challenge the state’s use of a rental car’s GPS where another person rented the car. It was also private action. United States v. Busby, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27276 (W.D. Tenn. Feb. 10, 2026). This … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Private search, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: No standing in GPS locator of car rented by another; also private search

WI: SnapChat’s view of 16 sec. CSAM video coming through it was private search

SnapChat viewing a 16-second video that came through its system was a private search. It was not unreasonable for officers to view it too without a warrant when SnapChat sent it to the police. Then that led to a warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WI: SnapChat’s view of 16 sec. CSAM video coming through it was private search

TX13: Student’s surreptitious recording of school resource officer planning to plant evidence violated no REP

Defendant was a school resource officer who wanted to search a classroom for a vape. The students were all ordered out of the class. One left her phone on record and captured the officer finding the vape and then discussing … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX13: Student’s surreptitious recording of school resource officer planning to plant evidence violated no REP

N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

Being a federal contractor wasn’t enough to make defendant food service company a state actor. Ellis v. Ben E. Keith Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217957 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2025). Officers had a warrant for the place searched and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Private search, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

Relying on Johnson v. Manitowoc County, 635 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2011), plaintiff’s claim for property damage from executing a search warrant is foreclosed. Hadley v. City of South Bend, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26040 (7th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025). … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Private search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

D.Neb.: Southwest employee wasn’t acting as govt agent in inventorying a suitcase and finding drugs

Defendant tried to retrieve a suitcase from Southwest Airlines in Omaha while not having been on a flight or having a claim check. The suspected bag arrived on the next flight from Phoenix, and it was taken by a SWA … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Independent source, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Southwest employee wasn’t acting as govt agent in inventorying a suitcase and finding drugs

CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

The video of execution of the search warrant was sufficiently authenticated to be admissible at trial despite coming in through a witness other than the one who took it. United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316 (1st Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Private search, Probable cause, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

CA2: Def’s GF using passcode to open his phone in presence of police wasn’t a governmental search

In a child pornography case, defendant’s girlfriend was not acting as an agent of the police when she used his passcode to open his phone in the presence of an officer. United States v. Hines, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 14336 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Private search | Comments Off on CA2: Def’s GF using passcode to open his phone in presence of police wasn’t a governmental search

E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. “Put plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

D.Alaska: Objection to only part of USMJ’s R&R is waiver of rest

Objection to the USMJ’s probable cause finding but not application of the good faith exception is waiver on the latter. United States v. Baldwin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106406 (D. Alaska June 4, 2025). The legality of the protective sweep … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Objection to only part of USMJ’s R&R is waiver of rest