Category Archives: Private search

N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

Being a federal contractor wasn’t enough to make defendant food service company a state actor. Ellis v. Ben E. Keith Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217957 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2025). Officers had a warrant for the place searched and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Private search, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

Relying on Johnson v. Manitowoc County, 635 F.3d 331 (7th Cir. 2011), plaintiff’s claim for property damage from executing a search warrant is foreclosed. Hadley v. City of South Bend, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 26040 (7th Cir. Oct. 7, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Pretext, Private search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: No property damage claim from executing SW

D.Neb.: Southwest employee wasn’t acting as govt agent in inventorying a suitcase and finding drugs

Defendant tried to retrieve a suitcase from Southwest Airlines in Omaha while not having been on a flight or having a claim check. The suspected bag arrived on the next flight from Phoenix, and it was taken by a SWA … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Independent source, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Southwest employee wasn’t acting as govt agent in inventorying a suitcase and finding drugs

CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

The video of execution of the search warrant was sufficiently authenticated to be admissible at trial despite coming in through a witness other than the one who took it. United States v. Reyes-Rosario, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16316 (1st Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Private search, Probable cause, Search incident, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA1: Video of SW execution sufficiently authenticated for trial

CA2: Def’s GF using passcode to open his phone in presence of police wasn’t a governmental search

In a child pornography case, defendant’s girlfriend was not acting as an agent of the police when she used his passcode to open his phone in the presence of an officer. United States v. Hines, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 14336 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Private search | Comments Off on CA2: Def’s GF using passcode to open his phone in presence of police wasn’t a governmental search

E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. “Put plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

D.Alaska: Objection to only part of USMJ’s R&R is waiver of rest

Objection to the USMJ’s probable cause finding but not application of the good faith exception is waiver on the latter. United States v. Baldwin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106406 (D. Alaska June 4, 2025). The legality of the protective sweep … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Objection to only part of USMJ’s R&R is waiver of rest

S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

2254 petitioner’s due process claim that the state court denied due process by not following precedent was barred by Stone. Allen v. Warden, SE. Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104131 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

Defendant got high and fell asleep on the couch, and he was there when the raid occurred. He didn’t have standing. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103820 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). The government’s motion to reconsider … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

Media Matters stated a claim in D.C. for First Amendment retaliation by the Texas Attorney General’s civil investigative demand for records based on not liking their reporting. Injunction affirmed. Media Matters for America v. Paxton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13155 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

CA9: Electronic monitoring condition of pretrial release was essentially a contract between def and court, thus consent

The Superior Court of San Francisco imposes electronic monitoring as a condition of pretrial release. Because it’s essentially a contract between the defendant and court, it’s consent to EM for release. It also does not violate state separation of powers. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Inventory, Private search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Electronic monitoring condition of pretrial release was essentially a contract between def and court, thus consent

CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

Defendant doesn’t challenge the stop or the frisk, just the seizure of the baggie of drugs that the officer felt in his “watch pocket.” The officer could tell what it was by its feel. Affirmed. United States v. Williams, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

MS: Police cell phone search as extensive as prior private search was reasonable

The warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone was the same as a private search that already occurred, and it did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Knight v. State, 2025 Miss. LEXIS 51 (Feb. 20, 2025). An NOLA officer seeing an … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Police cell phone search as extensive as prior private search was reasonable

N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

Defendant was taken to the ER for gunshot wounds. The hospital staff took his clothes and looked in his pockets and then turned them over to the police. This was a private search. United States v. Coleman, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

DE: After the first SW was overbroad, officers got a second narrower warrant which had an independent source from the first

When the search warrant was found overbroad, a second warrant was issued based on the same information that was far narrower. It was valid because of its independent source. The alleged false statement in the DNA warrant wasn’t. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on DE: After the first SW was overbroad, officers got a second narrower warrant which had an independent source from the first

NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

In a citizen’s arrest, if the citizen, not a law enforcement officer, violates the constitution or statute, the arrest will not be suppressed for that reason alone. His statement to an officer captured on video will not be suppressed because … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Private search, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY Monroe Co.: The constitution doesn’t apply to citizen’s arrest

KY: Landlord’s maintenance entry with electrician and a LEO because of a feared weapon was reasoanable

Defendant was schizophrenic and he was destroying the wiring in his apartment. The landlord got an electrician and then they brought a police officer because they feared he had a weapon (which he did). The entry by the police was … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Private search | Comments Off on KY: Landlord’s maintenance entry with electrician and a LEO because of a feared weapon was reasoanable

OH12: No reason why a federal search warrant can’t result in a state prosecution

A federal search warrant produced the drugs in question, and they were not inadmissible for that reason in a state prosecution. State v. Hana, 2024-Ohio-5548, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4234 (12th Dist. Nov. 25, 2024). The trial court found that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH12: No reason why a federal search warrant can’t result in a state prosecution

D.P.R.: Officer’s construction of traffic law was “ardous” and unreasonable under Heien

The officer’s conclusion defendant violated a U-turn statute was unreasonable, and the motion to suppress is granted. “While mistakes of law based on arduous questions of statutory interpretation may justify an officer’s judgment, a poor study of the law cannot … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Private search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Officer’s construction of traffic law was “ardous” and unreasonable under Heien

UT: NCMEC didn’t look at the CP this time, but it had this case, and that’s enough

The fact the hash value of defendant’s material was known to be child pornography, it didn’t matter that NCMEC didn’t view the material before passing it on to the police who did. There was a prior private search. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on UT: NCMEC didn’t look at the CP this time, but it had this case, and that’s enough