S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases. Villafane v. City of N.Y., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52149 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2023).

There was probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s DNA. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51296 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 27, 2023).*

“Because the [state] trial court considered Thomas’ Fourth Amendment claim on the merits, this Court cannot review its conclusion when considering a habeas petition” under Stone v. Powell. Thomas v. Kris, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51641 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2023).*

Because there was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest, there was no Fourth Amendment violation. Mincey v. Vardman, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51934 (M.D. Ga. Mar. 27, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.