S.D.Ill.: Overheard comment CI would be harmed was RS for stop

Overheard information that defendant was traveling to Cape Girardeau, Missouri to harm a CI was reasonable suspicion for his stop. When a dog alerted, too, that permitted a search anywhere in the car where drugs could be hidden. United States v. Smith, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230771 (S.D. Ill. Dec. 22, 2022).*

Defendant had no standing in his CSLI through Uber. The warrant for defendant’s Gmail account was particular since it described the crimes under investigation. United States v. Medina, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230727 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2022).*

Defendant had his “full and fair opportunity” to litigate the search claim even though he didn’t appeal on that ground. United States v. Fleming, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230839 (M.D. La. Dec. 21, 2022).*

Defendant consented to a search of his car despite asking whether he was being recorded and told they weren’t, but they were. United States v. Orlandella, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230848 (D. Mass. Dec. 22, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.