Author Archives: Hall

Treatise 30% off through 5/27

here use code MEMDAY26

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 30% off through 5/27

KS: Petr’s disclaimer of seized cash was a lack of standing in a forfeiture

Claimant’s disclaimer in the money should have been decided first, not the merits of the search. It’s essentially a lack of standing. State ex rel. Kansas Highway Patrol v. $381,620 in U.S. Currency, 2026 Kan. LEXIS 125 (May 15, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Petr’s disclaimer of seized cash was a lack of standing in a forfeiture

N.D.Fla.: Monitored bowel movement in prison didn’t violate 4A

In prison, “the visual strip search and the monitored bowel movement did not violate the Fourth Amendment.” McDonald v. Spears, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107383 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2026). Defendant’s consent to search his cell phone was limited and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Immigration arrests, Prison and jail searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Monitored bowel movement in prison didn’t violate 4A

WaPo: AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

WaPo: AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency by Annie Gowen (“In Troy, New York, residents and city officials are at odds over police use of Flock cameras, which some call a … Continue reading →

Posted in AI, Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on WaPo: AI license plate cameras tore this town apart and led to a state of emergency

D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

“To the extent that Plaintiffs’ claim is based on Defendant Pelham’s failure to conduct a more thorough investigation before seeking a warrant, it likewise fails. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants ‘failed to undertake minimally adequate investigative steps before seeking a warrant[.]’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

Today is the 72d anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education

Today is the 72d anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education, May 17, 1954. Not a 4A case, but so important to our constitutional history.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Today is the 72d anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education

GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

Defendant was a friend of the family, and he came over to install an additional security camera inside the house. Later, that camera caught him sexually assaulting one of the girls. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy despite spending … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Knock and talk, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: No REP in what a security camera saw that def installed in friends’ house when he was there sexually assaulting their daughter

DC: Def seized when blocked on sidewalk not just when taken down

Defendant was seized when he was blocked by officers when he was walking, not just when he was taken down to the sidewalk. Greer v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 168 (May 14, 2026). Defendant was stopped because his … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Def seized when blocked on sidewalk not just when taken down

TX: What does state need to raise when it appeals a suppression order?

An interesting opinion on appellate practice: The issue here: Whether the state waived one of its two arguments for sustaining a search by not appealing it. The court concludes it did not. Remanded. State v. Young, 2026 Tex. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on TX: What does state need to raise when it appeals a suppression order?

SC: DNA sample by SW two weeks before trial was independent of one three years earlier during investigation

Defendant wasn’t in custody in a murder investigation when officers obtained a DNA sample from him in 2019, they believed voluntarily. As the case came closer to trial, the defense moved to suppress it because he’d lawyered up, so they … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on SC: DNA sample by SW two weeks before trial was independent of one three years earlier during investigation

W.D.Wash.: Immigration arrest warrants can be signed by ALJs without violating 4A

“‘[C]onsistent with the Fourth Amendment, immigration authorities may arrest individuals for civil immigration removal purposes pursuant to an administrative arrest warrant issued by an executive official, rather than by a judge.’ Gonzalez v. U.S. Immigr. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Immigration arrest warrants can be signed by ALJs without violating 4A

D.R.I.: DOJ administrative subpoena for children’s medical records quashed; DOJ’s “presumption of regularity” is gone

This administrative subpoena for Rhode Island children’s medical records is quashed. DOJ’s presumption of regularity of its actions is now gone. In re Administrative Subpoena 25-1431-032 to R.I. Hosp., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105676 (D.R.I. May 13, 2026) (Update: ATL: … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.R.I.: DOJ administrative subpoena for children’s medical records quashed; DOJ’s “presumption of regularity” is gone

FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

Defendant was raided by the federal government for alleged cockfighting, and he claimed that “80-100” officers showed up “with bullet proof cars and ‘one of those war tanks.’” The product of the raid was given over to the state and … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

NM: Prosecutor’s question about PC for arrest warrant being found improper, but not reversible error here

It was improper for the prosecutor to question the arresting officer about the judge finding probable cause and issuing the arrest warrant. But, it was not so flagrant here to require reversal. State v. Aragon, 2026 N.M. LEXIS 81 (May … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on NM: Prosecutor’s question about PC for arrest warrant being found improper, but not reversible error here

CA4: Criminal seizure of evidence here not a 4A or due process violation

Motorcycles under lien were seized as evidence in a biker shootout. The finance company sued under the Fourth Amendment and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Deprivation of property as criminal evidence is not a violation of due … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Criminal seizure of evidence here not a 4A or due process violation

E.D.La.: ICE SDT to Orleans Parish Sheriff for immigration status of detainees was valid

ICE issued a subpoena to the Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff for information about detainees’ immigration status. After oral argument, the subpoena was narrowed, and it now complies with Morton Salt which “incorporates the Fourth Amendment reasonableness standard that applies to … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Dog sniff, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: ICE SDT to Orleans Parish Sheriff for immigration status of detainees was valid

E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

Defendant’s claim of “reverse stalking horse” parole search because the PO wasn’t present fails. There was reasonable suspicion for the search. United States v. Rose, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103581 (E.D. Tenn. May 11, 2026). The government gets the credibility … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

CA10: Officer’s peering through 1″ gap in curtains from outside was plain view

Denial of rehearing en banc: United States v. Watkins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13495 (10th Cir. May 11, 2026),* denial of rehearing en banc from United States v. Watkins, 156 F.4th 1049 (10th Cir. 2025):

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Officer’s peering through 1″ gap in curtains from outside was plain view

VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

There was a lack of nexus to cell phone to this alleged crime which voids the search warrant for it, and the good faith exception does not apply. Just having a cell phone on one’s person doesn’t link it to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on VI: Cell phone SW didn’t show nexus to crime; possession alone not enough

D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress

The protective sweep of defendant’s room is suppressed because the government articulates no reasonable suspicion to believe anyone else was in there. Delay in opening the door isn’t it. Searching between the mattress and box springs was also unreasonable. Waiting … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Md.: Mere delay in opening hotel door for arrest warrant didn’t justify protective sweep under the mattress