Category Archives: Collective knowledge

VA: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in revos

The exclusionary rule, along with a host of other things, doesn’t apply in revocation proceedings. Commonwealth v. Jackson, 2025 Va. LEXIS 57 (Nov. 20, 2025) (citing treatise § 9.16). The collective knowledge doctrine applies to traffic stops. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VA: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in revos

S.D.Ga.: Just being naked in bed in a hotel room doesn’t give standing

Just being naked in bed in a hotel room doesn’t give standing. Defendant had to show he either was the renter or there by permission of the renter. Here, nothing was offered on standing other than being there. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Just being naked in bed in a hotel room doesn’t give standing

CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

The officer resting his hand on defendant’s truck while talking to him during a stop was not a separate seizure of him. United States v. Larremore, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20757 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2025). The closest case plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Standards of review, Trespass | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s resting hand on truck while talking to def wasn’t a seizure

VA: Collective knowledge between state and federal officers for arrest

There was probable cause by collective knowledge for defendant’s arrest at Dulles airport where Virginia police asked Homeland Security to make the arrest. Lewis v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 412 (July 22, 2025) (unpublished).* Appellant’s Fourth Amendment claim was … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Collective knowledge between state and federal officers for arrest

D.Wyo.: SW’s catch-all phrase was still limited to drugs

“The warrant in this case has a catch-all phrase as to the types of evidence to be searched but is affirmatively limited to evidence of drug trafficking, manufacture, delivery, and possession. The warrant therefore satisfies the requirement described in cases … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Collective knowledge, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Wyo.: SW’s catch-all phrase was still limited to drugs

S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks claim fails. The omitted allegedly exculpatory evidence either wasn’t material to the probable cause finding or wasn’t known by law enforcement at the time the warrant issued. In this circuit, the collective knowledge doctrine applies to warrantless searches, … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Collective knowledge doctrine in CA2 only applies to warrantless searches, not a Franks challenge

D.Alaska: Motions in limine aren’t motions to suppress

Defendant filed a motion in limine in lieu of a motion to suppress which was otherwise out of time. A motion in limine isn’t a substitute for a motion to suppress. Nevertheless, the court goes to the merits of the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Motions in limine aren’t motions to suppress

CA3: Apartment visitor to conduct drug deal has no standing

An apartment visitor to conduct a drug deal has no standing to contest a search that happened while he was there. United States v. Loyal, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5853 (3d Cir. Mar. 13, 2025). By collective knowledge, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Pretext, Standards of review, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: Apartment visitor to conduct drug deal has no standing

N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

The USMJ’s credibility determinations on a search issue aren’t subject to de novo review before the USDJ. United States v. Messer, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11783 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 23, 2025).* Collective knowledge supported reasonable suspicion here to extend the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

D.Alaska: Unsigned SW affidavit still in GF where officer was sworn

The affidavit for warrant was unsigned by the officer but he had been sworn before the warrant issued. The good faith exception saves this search. United States v. Hampton, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200326 (D. Alaska Nov. 4, 2024) Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Unsigned SW affidavit still in GF where officer was sworn

CA3: Collective knowledge applies to reasons to extend a stop

With collective knowledge there was reason to extend the stop. United States v. McAliley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25982 (3d Cir. Oct. 15, 2024).* (After all, collective knowledge applies to reasonable suspicion too.) The USMJ’s decision denying the motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Collective knowledge applies to reasons to extend a stop

CA2: Failure to leave SW attachment at scene of search doesn’t void the search

That searching officers didn’t leave behind Attachment B to the warrant after the search didn’t void the search. United States v. Whaley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16819 (2d Cir. July 10, 2024). Collective knowledge here fails: “Based on the evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to leave SW attachment at scene of search doesn’t void the search

CA6: No QI for shooting a man obviously surrendering

Officers responded to an armed potentially suicidal man they found in his house. When commanded to show his hands he started to get down to the floor when he was shot. “A jury could find these actions would indicate to … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: No QI for shooting a man obviously surrendering

MO: Collective knowledge for RS doesn’t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing

Collective knowledge for reasonable suspicion doesn’t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing. “While Appellant seemingly takes issue with the fact that the officer who took Victim’s report did not also testify, the Hensley test only requires … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Collective knowledge, Foreign searches, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Collective knowledge for RS doesn’t require that every witness be called at the suppression hearing

CA6: No REP in “Walmart pay app” purchases; it’s a third-party record

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his “Walmart pay app” purchases from a third party subpoena of things he used in a bank robbery shortly thereafter. “Therefore, the third-party doctrine still applies to business records that might reveal … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Independent source, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in “Walmart pay app” purchases; it’s a third-party record

D.Nev.: No standing where alleged Turo car rental couldn’t be shown by driver

The court finds defendant lacked standing in a car he claims to have rented through Turo from the owner. The innocent driver of car stolen by someone else could have standing, but he doesn’t even get there. The rental couldn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Nev.: No standing where alleged Turo car rental couldn’t be shown by driver

M.D.Fla.: “[T]here is no constitutional right to be free from arrest on the basis of illegally obtained evidence.”

“[T]here is no constitutional right to be free from arrest on the basis of illegally obtained evidence.” Santiago v. Swain, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194607 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2023).* Plaintiff’s civil Franks claim fails because there was probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: “[T]here is no constitutional right to be free from arrest on the basis of illegally obtained evidence.”

ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

An inventory search that is a pretext for an investigatory search is unreasonable. Remanded for reconsideration of this issue. State v. Ramos, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 123 (Sep. 29, 2023). techdirt: The Casual Cruelty Of Cops: Inventory Search Edition by Tim … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

TN: Collective knowledge also applies to RS

Collective knowledge also applies to reasonable suspicion. State v. Hodge, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 317 (Aug. 24, 2023). Defendant’s “certified question” for appeal was overbroad. State v. Beech, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 313 (Aug. 24, 2023).* Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Collective knowledge, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TN: Collective knowledge also applies to RS

IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

“There was no emergency here. Officer Eber and the trial court expressed concern that a firearm might have been lying in Hinton’s backyard and could be accessed by a child or other person. But, even if so, there was no … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency